NAMBA P-LIMITED Motor List - Pro Boat Motors NO LONGER AVAILABLE

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steven Vaccaro
    Administrator
    • Apr 2007
    • 8720

    #226
    Originally posted by rayzerdesigns
    The proposal for 37x60 passed with the amendment of adding in any bearing protrusion included in length..off to BOD for approval then hopefully a vote soon to the membership
    Nice to see things moving forward.
    Steven Vaccaro

    Where Racing on a Budget is a Reality!

    Comment

    • rayzerdesigns
      Fast Electric Addict!
      • Dec 2013
      • 1228

      #227
      Well it def wasn’t going anywhere by just complaining about it.. lol

      Comment

      • Greg Schweers
        GREG SCHWEERS
        • Oct 2007
        • 92

        #228
        By adding the bearing you basically change the rule to 37 x 58

        Comment

        • rayzerdesigns
          Fast Electric Addict!
          • Dec 2013
          • 1228

          #229
          Originally posted by Greg Schweers
          By adding the bearing you basically change the rule to 37 x 58
          Come on Greg.. only a couple motors have it.. the provost motors did..not adding the bearing by the way.. its the can length.. if either end has the bearing protrusion as part of can or end bell it’s then why wouldn’t it be included in the length??

          Comment

          • rayzerdesigns
            Fast Electric Addict!
            • Dec 2013
            • 1228

            #230
            I’m pretty sure the neu.. sss.. tp..leopard..ose motors and many more don’t have the protrusion.

            Comment

            • Greg Schweers
              GREG SCHWEERS
              • Oct 2007
              • 92

              #231
              I just wanna know the reasoning behind adding the bearing housing to the overall length

              Comment

              • rayzerdesigns
                Fast Electric Addict!
                • Dec 2013
                • 1228

                #232
                To keep someone from having a custom can with a bearing protrusion that would allow a longer rotor/stator.. it might not seem like a lot Greg.. and you of all people should know this..I’ve been involved with many motor manufacturers and know the ins and outs of brushless motors..it seems you are not in board or agree with the measurement/proposal that was submitted.. and that is your choice..hopefully we will all get to vote on this soon as the current namba list is getting to the non existent point..this is a simple measurement that is easily teched..no weight.. no grey area.. is it going to be the correct thing to save limited classes?? Time will tell..I’m hoping we can keep the biggest fe classes in NAMBA going..hope everyone has a merry Christmas and a happy new year..as soon as I hear something from national I will post it..

                Comment

                • HTVboats
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 803

                  #233
                  I don't think it is a matter of saving or killing this class. Not having affordable and available motor and esc's will surely stunt its growth. One reason the spec class thrives is it is not totally dependent on RTR equipment and the suppliers need for sales over supporting racing organizations which don't have a large market share. I have seen many RTR classes die over the years for various reasons. Lack of equipment choices being one. Manufacturers changing products for whatever reason another. Dimension specs aren't perfect but solve a lot of issues.
                  Mic

                  Mic Halbrehder
                  IMPBA 8656
                  NAMBA 1414

                  Comment

                  • longballlumber
                    Fast Electric Addict!
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 3132

                    #234
                    Originally posted by rayzerdesigns
                    provost motors
                    Is this new? Care to share a link?

                    Thanks

                    Comment

                    • T.S.Davis
                      Fast Electric Addict!
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 6221

                      #235
                      haha Spell checked from a phone I predict. ProBoat.
                      Noisy person

                      Comment

                      • longballlumber
                        Fast Electric Addict!
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 3132

                        #236
                        Originally posted by T.S.Davis
                        haha Spell checked from a phone I predict. ProBoat.
                        Of course...

                        Other than the few that have already been discussed, I am interested to see the "windfall" of motors that a 60mm limit is going to produce.

                        Comment

                        • T.S.Davis
                          Fast Electric Addict!
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 6221

                          #237
                          I don't think it will. I think ("think") the intent was to allow something to be developed should the well dry up but still keep out the next power group that is 1415's. Flawed thinking? Maybe..... but some compromise has to be accepted somewhere.
                          Noisy person

                          Comment

                          • Greg Schweers
                            GREG SCHWEERS
                            • Oct 2007
                            • 92

                            #238
                            If rotor length made a difference Steve Neu would be using them in his motors .Can size controls the length of the stater and the wire. I have no problem with 37 x60

                            Comment

                            • photohoward1
                              Fast Electric Addict!
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 1610

                              #239
                              Hey I have an idea. Limit the Battery. Say 3000mah limit per 1 heat. Not hard to tech battery. If there is a question of how many mah
                              someone used just take the pack and charge it. if it goes past 3000mah. You are disqualified. Efficiency is the key. Big motor big amps. This scenario would limit the amps used in a race. A guy could run a Neu 1521 or a Lehner if they wanted. They are limited to 3000mah per race. That's about 120 average amps per race. If that's to High then drop it to 2500. That's 100 amps average. If you want an easy way to control power limit the fuel. Heck make it 2000mah. 80 amps average. Don't give me crap that guys need the weight. Just add it then. Not in batteries though. And don't give me crap about "c" ratings. A 2000mah pack with a 70c rating should be good for 140 amps.

                              Comment

                              • TheShaughnessy
                                Fast Electric Addict!
                                • Mar 2011
                                • 1431

                                #240
                                It would take forever to tech battery capacity, plus just because a charger shows 3000 mah doesn't mean all 3000 went into the battery. No no no, bad idea. What happens if you cut a bouy and have to do a penalty lap, two penalty laps? You now get dq'd instead of points? 37x60 and include the bearing shoulder/protrusion if it exists. I can get behind that.

                                Comment

                                Working...