Blueprinting UL-1 Motor Wires

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brushless55
    Creator
    • Oct 2008
    • 9488

    #136
    Originally posted by Doug Smock
    What class, set up etc?
    Doug, this was in my PSpec Rigger with help from Snowman

    Originally posted by photohoward1
    When are we going to admit that those motors suck. I have gone to a nue 1515/1y in all my spec setups. More reliable and better built.

    My 20 SGX rigger clicked at 63mph on an H7 and 120 seaking. 85 degrees on the motor.

    I think we made a big mistake picking cheap motors. I have burned up too many. We all would have saved money by buying better quality from the start.
    That is not a PSpec motor that most of us race with..

    Originally posted by LuckyDuc
    I replaced a UL-1 motor I had in my LSH for the last 2 yrs with a new one at the beginning of summer. It only lasted 3 runs before frying on the same setup as the 2 yr old motor. I put the 2 yr old UL-1 motor back in and haven't had a problem since doing that.
    yep, mine went up in about 5 1/2 laps total... 3 on practice day without any issues and 2 1/2 laps in heat #1 before is smoked..
    I did put in a older UL-1 motor before heat #3 and ended up placing 2nd for our finals on Sat.

    Originally posted by properchopper
    While I really want to cautiously avoid "stirring the pot" on this topic, I'm sitting on a mountain of shared experience in the P-Ltd realm in which the AQ2030 motor is the bread-and-butter powerplant and there seems that some "discussion" may be warranted regarding the durability of later-model versions of this motor.
    I hope this is not what is happening
    .NAMBA20...Caterpillar UL-1, P-Spec OM29, P-Mono DF33, P-Spec JAE, Aussie 33" Hydro-LSH, Sprintcat CC2028 on 8s, PT SS45 Q Hydro, PS295 UL-1 power, OSE Brothers Outlaw QMono 4-sale, Rio 51z CC2028 on 8s

    Comment

    • Doby
      KANADA RULES!
      • Apr 2007
      • 7280

      #137
      Originally posted by LuckyDuc
      Where's the dead horse emoticon?
      In Peterson's computer somewhere!
      Grand River Marine Modellers
      https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...ne%20modellers

      Comment

      • TheShaughnessy
        Fast Electric Addict!
        • Mar 2011
        • 1431

        #138
        Weather

        This could get ugly best not to play with fire.
        Attached Files

        Comment

        • TheShaughnessy
          Fast Electric Addict!
          • Mar 2011
          • 1431

          #139
          Fuel

          Picture of a monitor so might be a lil fuzzy.
          Attached Files

          Comment

          • properchopper
            • Apr 2007
            • 6968

            #140
            Originally posted by TheShaughnessy
            This could get ugly best not to play with fire.
            While I'm not sayin' that these motors are less robust than earlier ones() I have taken some steps

            I'll match you One electric computer fan (reversed to extract heat from the motor)
            and
            raise you One independent pickup for the motor only

            DSC04792.JPG

            and also raise you

            The ProperChopper Labs prototype blue-ice filled in-line KoolStick (pictured during sink test)

            DSC04850.JPG





            DSC04853.JPG
            2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
            2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
            '11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /Mono

            Comment

            • TheShaughnessy
              Fast Electric Addict!
              • Mar 2011
              • 1431

              #141
              I'll match your independent pick up.

              I'll be prototyping a kopper kool keeper here pretty soon.
              Attached Files

              Comment

              • Doug Smock
                Moderator
                • Apr 2007
                • 5272

                #142
                MODEL BOAT RACER
                IMPBA President
                District 13 Director 2011- present
                IMPBA National Records Director 2009-2019
                IMPBA 19887L CD
                NAMBA 1169

                Comment

                • photohoward1
                  Fast Electric Addict!
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 1610

                  #143
                  If they had better wire to begin with...We would not need silly wire coolers or separation of wires so they don't touch. We are putting 5.5mm or 6mm connectors on 2 or 3mm wire. It's just stupid.
                  Maybe we need to statr stirring a little bit. The forum has been boring for a while. I like rays suggestion. But hand out props. All the same pitch!

                  Comment

                  • LuckyDuc
                    Team Ducati Racing
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 989

                    #144
                    Perhaps this is the path that leads back to the revival of the "P" classes.

                    Comment

                    • Chilli
                      Fast Electric Addict!
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 3070

                      #145
                      LuckyDuc, you posted this as I was composing this message. You hit the nail on the head.

                      Though I admire all the innovations for trying to get the most out of the UL1 motors, I think if they were run closer to the parameters they were designed for there would be no need for all these modifications. Most in my area run a 42x55 for tunnels and sport hydro's and the H7 for riggers. The result is competitive heats with very few failures which is what I strive for in my district. We may be a couple mph slower than many of you but we have a hell of a good time racing without burning stuff up. This has helped us bring newbies and IC converts into FE racing. I have come to realize the P-Limited classes serve a different purpose in other parts of the country and that's cool. Everyone has to do what ever makes your membership happy. Howard does bring up some good points. For the price of three burned out UL1 motors you can buy a Neu. I'm curious how many clubs and districts only run P-Limited classes?? I'm heard of P-Limted Tunnel, Hydro, Sport Hydro, Mono, Offshore classes and even a few talk about a Q-Limited class. What I want to know is why are we so stuck on the Limited classes?? Why not just P and Q? It's obviously not about money since many are going through a couple motors a year??
                      Mike Chirillo
                      www.capitolrcmodelboats.com

                      Comment

                      • photohoward1
                        Fast Electric Addict!
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 1610

                        #146
                        Originally posted by Chilli
                        LuckyDuc, you posted this as I was composing this message. You hit the nail on the head.

                        Though I admire all the innovations for trying to get the most out of the UL1 motors, I think if they were run closer to the parameters they were designed for there would be no need for all these modifications. Most in my area run a 42x55 for tunnels and sport hydro's and the H7 for riggers. The result is competitive heats with very few failures which is what I strive for in my district. We may be a couple mph slower than many of you but we have a hell of a good time racing without burning stuff up. This has helped us bring newbies and IC converts into FE racing. I have come to realize the P-Limited classes serve a different purpose in other parts of the country and that's cool. Everyone has to do what ever makes your membership happy. Howard does bring up some good points. For the price of three burned out UL1 motors you can buy a Neu. I'm curious how many clubs and districts only run P-Limited classes?? I'm heard of P-Limted Tunnel, Hydro, Sport Hydro, Mono, Offshore classes and even a few talk about a Q-Limited class. What I want to know is why are we so stuck on the Limited classes?? Why not just P and Q? It's obviously not about money since many are going through a couple motors a year??
                        Human nature on wanting to go faster. I run an H7 on my rigger and it always came back hot. Mine is probably not set-up as well as some others that come back cool. To be competitive I need that H7..on cooler days I ran an H10... "A wise man spends wisely. A fool spends foolishly" I can run my LSO on an M445 (2030/1800kv) all day. One prop tick higher and poof! BTW I put the 1515/1y in my rigger and 63mph..H7, 85 degrees 7 laps and 3000mah... and that motor is 6 years old and been beaten to death..(apparently not death it's still screams). In my club we run a small open class. 4s. New guys usually show up with castle or leopard motor in them. I was the only one with a AQ2030 (because I travel and race). I would smoke a motor and they would wonder what idiot spec'd those motors? (I was in the original discussion group that helped pick them.) Live and learn.

                        Comment

                        • Steven Vaccaro
                          Administrator
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 8720

                          #147
                          I think that with anything, there are some production runs that are better than others with mass produced items. You guys run them harder than they were intended on and find the limits much faster. I sell the 1415 1y for $165.00 that's twice the cost of a 2030 but one burnt up motor and it your even.
                          Steven Vaccaro

                          Where Racing on a Budget is a Reality!

                          Comment

                          • photohoward1
                            Fast Electric Addict!
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 1610

                            #148
                            Originally posted by Steven Vaccaro
                            I think that with anything, there are some production runs that are better than others with mass produced items. You guys run them harder than they were intended on and find the limits much faster. I sell the 1415 1y for $165.00 that's twice the cost of a 2030 but one burnt up motor and it your even.
                            My thoughts exactly....

                            Comment

                            • SirBudman32
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2011
                              • 625

                              #149
                              Howard, I have a 1515 2200 in my Jae as well. With the H-7 mine ran 63 mph but came back with everything under 110 degrees. I am running on 5s also. I do run with a 1450 same set up and it runs 75 mph consistently.
                              Modified Jae21, Stock Jae21, Cheetah, Ul-1, Shock Wave 26 V2 (Rescue Boat).

                              Comment

                              • DPeterson
                                Senior Member
                                • Apr 2007
                                • 842

                                #150
                                Brushless55 - A fellow racer of mine had the same thing happen. He returned it back to Tower and received back another one.

                                It appears the manufactuer of the motor decided to switch the type of varnish used to coat the windings as there is a distinct difference. I too lost a new motor in a tried and true set up. In another proven set up I am seeing higher run temps.

                                As for cooling - I have been experimenting with all kinds of cooling systems. I am sure there are some positve attributes. However I believe that any and all cooling systems that we apply can not take the heat away as fast as it is generated. Therefore we really can not cool the weak link in the motor (the beginning of the windings).

                                So far I have not gone through any more UL1 motors than I used to go through with the 700 Brushed motors in the spec classes. Even though I had argued from day one against specing Chinese equipment I am not ready to throw in the towel. We have gotten to this point by making 3 bad decisions 1. allowing 2P, 2. wrong length limits and 3. specing Chinese equipment. Lets be very carefull and more thorough when we are discussing future directions.

                                Enough for now - got to find my Horse Icon in my computer. :)
                                Doug Peterson
                                IMPBA 19993
                                www.badgerboaters.com

                                Comment

                                Working...