The fastech has a deeper v-design than the sv. My guess is its heavier too. That alone would mean better rough water handling. The titan looks to have a hull design closer to the sv, just much longer. I think it will do just fine on nimh or 4s.
Traxxas Titan
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
'11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /MonoComment
-
There is way more to this that simply hull design. Drive layout makes a difference as well.
the Fastech doesn't have the "Deep-V" design that it appears to have. It starts out that way, but then quickly transitions back to an almost flat V. Has a HUGE flat ride surface in the back.
This wouldn't be that bad, except that it's coupled with a semi-sub-surface drive setup... which provides WAY more lift than the hull needs. Running typical surface-drive props, like most do, just compounds the handling issues.Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
"Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."Comment
-
I was trying to tell from the pics but I can't be sure. The Traxxas hull looks like it might be injected instead of vac formed. Much better product than what I was doing. No thin spots at critical points.
Like I said, I sure would like to see one up close.Noisy personComment
-
As with any marketing/production venture, a balance has to be struck between physical integrity/performance and price point. To answer any possible criticisms of this product would surely drive the price point upward which likely isn't Traxxas' intention. My take is that this product delivers a lot of bang for the buck. It may suffer some when viewed from the max performance/raceworthy/ crashworthy perspective in which most of our crowd lives , but still, for the money, this looks to be a winner in many, if not all ways, particularly for it's target market. To wit : Imagine coming up with a product whose appeal is directed only to the serious racer/high performance population vs. the entry level rtr/sport boater. You gotta' know where the largest group of customers [and profits] will be derived from ! All in all, I'm glad to see this, and other well thought out r/c marine products now becoming available widen the choices for potential new & existing members of our community.2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
'11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /MonoComment
-
I'm hoping to see this be a very reliable boat on 4s. I have a brushless e-revo (claimed to do 50 or 60 on 6s), that I have been running on 4s with no issues for almost a year. The max speed / voltage claims are interesting for the titan, but I'm hoping more than anything that just means it will have no issues running 4s all the time. I've been looking a while for a fun / quick RTR boat to get started with, and hopefully this fits the bill.Catching Air!Comment
-
How many people sell a mass market boat that goes (we will assume it is true) 50+mph with just the right batteries and NO other changes? That is a pretty fast speed for out of the box and certainly for the price point. I am spending a whole lot more money on custom built boats only to hit that same rough number. Seriously, does any one else sell a boat right now that will go 50+ with just batteries out of the box for roughly $330.00 (with Towerhobbies discount)???Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Your UL-1 hits 50plus stock? I have one of these boats(just had to replace the esc with a swordfish 120). I would say it was hitting mid 40's out of the box(at best). You are saying with a stock prop and good batteries you are getting that kind of speed?Comment
-
Seriously, does any one else sell a boat right now that will go 50+ with just batteries out of the box for roughly $330.00 (with Towerhobbies discount)???
HOWEVER, just because a boat can HIT 50mph, doesn't mean it will RUN 50mph... ALL of the boats mentioned above have been proven to HIT 50mph+, but you wouldn't want to drive them like that, so what's the BIG deal?
Give me a boat that will run a 1/6th mile oval averaging 35+MPH (hitting 45-48 in the straights) and I'm much happier than I would be with a boat that will hit 50mph in a straight line just before ending up upside down and is all but undrivable in the turns...Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
"Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."Comment
-
True. But you don't need to spend $ for 6s batteries. And do you really think that "compostite" prop will last on 6s in a 36" boat?If all of your wishes are granted, many of your dreams will be destroyed!Comment
-
Well said Tony.
I've had similar discussions with both ProBoat and AQ guys. There's a difference between what you CAN sell and what you WANT to sell. I think all the manufacturers would prefer to sell super high end high zoot race boats but who's gonna fork out the dough? A tiny little segment and most of those guys prefer to build their own so that it's just the way they want it.
The latest offerings from all 3 (the big 3?) seem to be a nice compromise between performance and marketability. I'm okay with that. It's great for model boating.
Plus, a guy that gets used to 50 will want more. That's where us nut jobs can point them to the next level of madness.Noisy personComment
-
I like the UL a lot but the fastest most stable one in our club doesn't run 50 and at top speed still gets crazy at the end of the back straight. In straight with perfect conditions it will go more than 50 I'll bet.
The Titan might not be stable at 50 in traffic either. Goofing around on a pond sure. We wont know till their actually out there.Noisy personComment
Comment