Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in .../vb/bbcode/url.php on line 114 FYI, TP Motor news......Changes to face plate! - Offshore Electrics Forums

FYI, TP Motor news......Changes to face plate!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MarkF
    dinogylipos.com
    • Mar 2008
    • 979

    #16
    Here is a TP 5860 650KV in an Insane 45" mono. This motor has the 6 bolt star pattern. This pattern made me have to drill new holes in my motor mount which accommodated a 40 and 50mm bolt 4 star pattern. I hope they go the 4 bolt route on these motors too.

    Mark
    Attached Files

    Comment

    • properchopper
      • Apr 2007
      • 6968

      #17
      Originally posted by ray schrauwen
      What length stud do you use or does it vary?

      What tool do you use to tighten the nut when motor is in tight areas?

      This is attractive for a hull I can use for both p-limited and p mono. Just add a tail ring support.
      Ray,

      Some answers :

      #1] Length of stud is determined by Inter-Ocular Trauma Test : I just stare at a 3mm bolt (in the vice) and when an appropriate length hits me between the eyes I grab the Dremel. Gill is correct ; not so long as to short out on stator windings

      #2] 'Cause you're on of my fav's, here some top secrets :

      Nut tightening / removal essentials :
      a. Home made angle un-nutting / re-nutting thingie (handle+old flex shaft with 7/32" socket goobered on)
      b.and most important 7/32" (or 5.5mm) mini-wrench

      DSC07760.JPG

      Mini wrench to apply final tightening or break loose already tightened nut:

      DSC07761.JPG

      Flex thingie in action:

      DSC07763.JPG


      BUT WAIT !!!! No need to home-make the flex thingie !!

      SHAZAM : Now available from your choice of Chinese Goodie Vendors :

      DSC07766.JPG

      Yowzah

      DSC07765.JPG


      You're Welcome
      2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
      2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
      '11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /Mono

      Comment

      • grsboats
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2012
        • 975

        #18
        Funny Tony..lol.....a piece of silicone tube sometimes helps to start screwing the nut in tight places like in my riggers.Gill
        GO FAST AND TURN RIGHT !
        www.grsboats.com.br

        Comment

        • ray schrauwen
          Fast Electric Addict!
          • Apr 2007
          • 9471

          #19
          Thanks Tony, Merry Christmas.
          Nortavlag Bulc

          Comment

          • NativePaul
            Greased Weasel
            • Feb 2008
            • 2760

            #20
            What a shame, I love 1 piece cans.
            Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

            Comment

            • properchopper
              • Apr 2007
              • 6968

              #21
              Originally posted by grsboats
              Funny Tony..lol.....a piece of silicone tube sometimes helps to start screwing the nut in tight places like in my riggers.Gill
              #1 tip
              2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
              2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
              '11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /Mono

              Comment

              • RaceMechaniX
                Fast Electric Addict!
                • Sep 2007
                • 2821

                #22
                Tony I think you need to do a boaters version of the "Turbo Encabulator."

                Tyler Garrard
                NAMBA 639/IMPBA 20525
                T-Hydro @ 142.94mph former WR

                Comment

                • properchopper
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 6968

                  #23
                  Originally posted by RaceMechaniX
                  Tony I think you need to do a boaters version of the "Turbo Encabulator."

                  I'll give it some thought - Right now I'm dialing in my Vac-U-Pickle

                  DSC00788-1.JPG
                  2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
                  2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
                  '11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /Mono

                  Comment

                  • Shooter
                    Team Mojo
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 2558

                    #24
                    Originally posted by NativePaul
                    What a shame, I love 1 piece cans.
                    I completely agree. The one pc is far superior. Seems a lot of these motor companies are going this direction for cost savings.

                    Comment

                    • ray schrauwen
                      Fast Electric Addict!
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 9471

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Shooter
                      I completely agree. The one pc is far superior. Seems a lot of these motor companies are going this direction for cost savings.
                      I see no reason for one piece can being superior. Lehner has been doing it the old way (precisely) for quite some time.

                      The only advantage to one piece cans is lower production costs. The front bearing on some is a bear to replace. With a removable front plate bearings take no time to replace and the rotor doesn't have to come out chancing damage to it's wrap.
                      Last edited by ray schrauwen; 12-17-2016, 01:17 PM.
                      Nortavlag Bulc

                      Comment

                      • Shooter
                        Team Mojo
                        • Jun 2009
                        • 2558

                        #26
                        Only reason I say that is because the 1pc allows the front bearing area to be machined at the same time (better concentricity). Simple and less parts.

                        Comment

                        • Nevs
                          Sven
                          • Sep 2011
                          • 164

                          #27
                          Some pic. and facts of the 4070. 8mm

                          Comment

                          • Fluid
                            Fast and Furious
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 8011

                            #28
                            I see no reason for one piece can being superior. Lehner has been doing it the old way (precisely) for quite some time....
                            Check out post #7. One piece cans are much more expensive to make. Multi-piece types can simply use extruded tubing for the body. End bells are cheap and easy to make in bulk on CNC machinery. This is a more versatile manufacturing method, easier to respond to orders with multiple length cans. Neu started in business with one-piece cans because Steve believed they were better, but they reduced cost and delivery time by stopping the practice.

                            IMG_3196.jpg

                            Of course, both types will work.



                            .
                            Last edited by Fluid; 12-26-2016, 11:51 AM.
                            ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for

                            Comment

                            • Nevs
                              Sven
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 164

                              #29
                              What matters is watts and your abilety to use it, (speed)..What matters is weight and your abilety to make it less... To have the speed you want...As long as you want it..

                              Comment

                              • Fluid
                                Fast and Furious
                                • Apr 2007
                                • 8011

                                #30
                                Not sure how the post above fits in the thread, but I'll bite. What really matters to many is reliability, efficiency, and cost. For top speed, light weight should not be a goal by itself - to balance lift you may need weight and better to have it in essential parts than to have to add lead. For racing, speed is usually secondary to handling and the ability to finish. Unfortunately, many here seem to be unaware of these, or oblivious to them....


                                .
                                ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for

                                Comment

                                Working...