Thanks i guess im a modern boy then haha i want everything hidden i just ordered some thinner braded sleeving that i was going to use for my wires and cooling hoses. Thats what i used on the cooling tubes that are coming from the motor, looks nice i think.
fightercat daytona build
Collapse
X
-
Ok thanks i was so confused haha. Does anyone know whats better, futaba or spectrum?: i know this is probably a personal pereferance but i need new remote instead of running the cheap hk remote.Every one knows the best part about building a boat is SANDING!!!! Just kiddingComment
-
Well, you just opened a can of worms!
Futaba is impeccable. I had only old FM and AM radios. Can't tell you how the 2.4 ghz works, but people who use them will not trade anything else for it.
Spectrum has worked for me flawlessly. I speak out of first hand experience. make sure you use their Marine receivers (MR200 and/or MR3000).
HK, what brand? FlySky?? For your info, as cheap as it is, it has also worked for me flawlessly, but it is not an item which people are willing to recommend because in the event it fails, nobody wants to take the blame for it. It is known to have failures among members in clubs and these are facts, nobody can argue with facts....Too many boats, not enough time...Comment
-
Ok thanks i was thinking of going with the spectrum recoever from ose its like 60 bucks right now. And i meant hobbyking it was like the cheapies remote they hadEvery one knows the best part about building a boat is SANDING!!!! Just kiddingComment
-
I've heard (have no experience with the new futaba radios) that they are the best. Flysky.....well I have too much money in my boats to go cheap and chance it. Spektrum has given me problems but I've worked them out. So far once I figured out that running both antennas out the hull extended my range by farther than I can see. I prefer the spectrum for ease of use, settings are easy to fool with and the display looks cool and lights up. O and it's very light and comfortable. Just my opinion. Not saying it's better than futaba by any means.32" carbon rivercat single 4s 102mph, 27” mini Rivercat 92mph, kbb34 91mph, jessej micro cat(too fast) wasComment
-
I've heard (have no experience with the new futaba radios) that they are the best. Flysky.....well I have too much money in my boats to go cheap and chance it. Spektrum has given me problems but I've worked them out. So far once I figured out that running both antennas out the hull extended my range by farther than I can see. I prefer the spectrum for ease of use, settings are easy to fool with and the display looks cool and lights up. O and it's very light and comfortable. Just my opinion. Not saying it's better than futaba by any means.Every one knows the best part about building a boat is SANDING!!!! Just kiddingComment
-
I can;'t speak for him, but I remember he wasn't happy with the range, and asked how one should arrange the antennas. You see, the instruction on these receivers is to pull one (longer one)outside the hull and leave the other one inside. They should form a 90* lay out. ( one vertical and one horizontal).
As said, Travis finally routed BOTH antennas out the tube and he was finally satisfied with the range. I guess he didn't want to have two antenna tubes outside on his hull(s).
I am NOT answering this FOR him but because last night I finally rigged up my MR3000 in my twin drive H&M Intruder S. Since CF layup effects signal reception BIG TIME, I did the same as Travis, I used a slightly larger diameter tube and squeezed both antennas thru this tube. I have not run it yet but I do remember Travis' posting and I expect no issues.Too many boats, not enough time...Comment
-
So im also looking into extendingg some of the wires that go into my reciever so it looks nice and one i would like to extend is my bec wire can i extend the wire that connects the bec to the reciever?Every one knows the best part about building a boat is SANDING!!!! Just kiddingComment
-
Both MR200 and MR3000 have two antennas.
I can;'t speak for him, but I remember he wasn't happy with the range, and asked how one should arrange the antennas. You see, the instruction on these receivers is to pull one (longer one)outside the hull and leave the other one inside. They should form a 90* lay out. ( one vertical and one horizontal).
As said, Travis finally routed BOTH antennas out the tube and he was finally satisfied with the range. I guess he didn't want to have two antenna tubes outside on his hull(s).
I am NOT answering this FOR him but because last night I finally rigged up my MR3000 in my twin drive H&M Intruder S. Since CF layup effects signal reception BIG TIME, I did the same as Travis, I used a slightly larger diameter tube and squeezed both antennas thru this tube. I have not run it yet but I do remember Travis' posting and I expect no issues.
Yes I have both antennas run in the same tube. It's a pain tho, you have to squeeze the tube a little and make it oval so they both fit32" carbon rivercat single 4s 102mph, 27” mini Rivercat 92mph, kbb34 91mph, jessej micro cat(too fast) wasComment
-
I was eating dinner with the family, that why I didn't answer....but you hit the nail on the head. I couldn't have put it better myself, that's exactly the problem I was having. All is well now with all of my boats as they all very far.
Yes I have both antennas run in the same tube. It's a pain tho, you have to squeeze the tube a little and make it oval so they both fit
Cheers!
Sent from my D6708 using TapatalkToo many boats, not enough time...Comment
-
Comment
Comment