32" hotr 90+mph

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TotalPackage
    Banned
    • Jul 2010
    • 601

    #151
    Good run Howard

    Comment

    • ray schrauwen
      Fast Electric Addict!
      • Apr 2007
      • 9471

      #152
      Great work Howard!
      Nortavlag Bulc

      Comment

      • 6sHyper
        <<<Surfs up!
        • Jan 2011
        • 597

        #153
        Originally posted by LarrysDrifter
        Lets not get skeptical over Howards speeds. We all go off our own GPS's,so let him.If you dont believe his speeds,then dont believe it. Let the man have his thread.
        I agree, and if he's getting multiple readings of within reason the same approximate speed then i would think its pretty accurate, hell i have a forerunner 201 and i use it in my boats, like Keith advised i do bring my boat in and reset mine every 4 passes if i'm doing speed runs, that way i know its accurate, and just like Howard said if its so "inaccurate" why does it seem to always be the same reading as my truck when i test it in there to and from the lake??? I think the one guy is going a little overboard with his massive explanation of inaccuracy, hell were just checking rc boat speeds here not the speed of a satelite travelling around earth, maybe he works for Nasa or something??? LOL Sure it may be off by a mile an hour here and there but they are pretty damn accurate!

        Comment

        • LarrysDrifter
          Big Booty Daddy
          • May 2010
          • 3278

          #154
          Accurate enough for sport speed chasing with rc boats.

          Comment

          • ray schrauwen
            Fast Electric Addict!
            • Apr 2007
            • 9471

            #155
            Originally posted by Howard Lee
            If its off so much then why dose it read the same as my car speedo.
            Next time when you are in your car and taking a reading, shake your gps violently to see if it mis-reads some other speed than what you are travelling.

            That should end the discussion of false readings.
            Nortavlag Bulc

            Comment

            • Brushless55
              Creator
              • Oct 2008
              • 9488

              #156
              Originally posted by LarrysDrifter
              Accurate enough for sport speed chasing with rc boats.
              .NAMBA20...Caterpillar UL-1, P-Spec OM29, P-Mono DF33, P-Spec JAE, Aussie 33" Hydro-LSH, Sprintcat CC2028 on 8s, PT SS45 Q Hydro, PS295 UL-1 power, OSE Brothers Outlaw QMono 4-sale, Rio 51z CC2028 on 8s

              Comment

              • rearwheelin
                Fast Electric Addict!
                • Oct 2008
                • 1941

                #157
                Originally posted by Simon.O.
                Are we all taking the p1ss here or are some people for real !!
                If the esc gets that hot that it needs caps cooling then there are a LOT of things wrong with the setup.

                To save me typing a lot more, someone please tell me this is a long wa$te of time. PM me if you like, but to me this is a long thread going no where.
                Do you have any original ideas or inventive products to the FE industry ? Why can't you do something good about your negative take on this thread.......As far as putting down what I have done about cooling caps , you can build heat in caps really fast where I live when temps are allready in the 90's-100's in the summer, when the only thing hot on my esc was the caps and not because of the lack of "C" rating I decided to do something about it, obviously you can only picture cold enviroment setups..........Some setups work better than others for diffrent builders .....some like to make there own parts and make it there own like nobody elses.............I think Howard is getting a kick out of all the haters......lol
                "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."
                --Albert Einstein

                Comment

                • keithbradley
                  Fast Electric Addict!
                  • Jul 2010
                  • 3663

                  #158
                  Originally posted by ray schrauwen
                  Next time when you are in your car and taking a reading, shake your gps violently to see if it mis-reads some other speed than what you are travelling.

                  That should end the discussion of false readings.
                  Obviously the axis is different... you would have to shake it violently 20feet in ever direction to simulate what a boat or car does when it flips. Crashing can definitely change readings. I know just because I've done it quite a few times.

                  Also, if you briefly lose signal in your vehicle you can see it. I sometimes notice it when going under certain overpasses...I can be going 75...it will jump to 78, back down to 72, then back to 75. All within fractions of a second but you can see it, and the top speed still registers. I have checked the max speed on my car's and my wifes van's GPS's and found mistakes. Mine said over 200mph once. My car's pretty fast, but not that fast.

                  Like I said, it's really pretty easy. After you get enough readings, it doesnt require any special science to notice which ones you have to throw out and which ones are consistant.

                  Something else I have been thinking about (and I hope you dont mind the sidetrack Howard, you already have a pretty big thread here...). I have been considering modding my g-tech accelerometer to run off an rx sized pack and putting it in a boat. Anybody have an idea how many Gs an RC boat can pull?
                  www.keithbradleyboats.com

                  Comment

                  • rearwheelin
                    Fast Electric Addict!
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 1941

                    #159
                    Originally posted by Howard Lee
                    This is only my 1st test run. Give me a little time and you can have a state trooper radar me if you like. This is the new 500 gps, garmin said it 100%.
                    Right on Howard...HaHaHa !.......Gps don't lie, I have found them to be accurate.....true its easier to get a higher speed rating on gps then runing threw timing lights or using stop watches because GPS doesn't see that stuff...It measures your top speed and not your average speed between 2 points! Howard , just try to stay full speed for atleast 2 seconds to get the best reading.......
                    "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."
                    --Albert Einstein

                    Comment

                    • rearwheelin
                      Fast Electric Addict!
                      • Oct 2008
                      • 1941

                      #160
                      Good running, boat held together nicely ! Make sure you take a good look at the NAMBA rule book before you take her to a SAW !
                      "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."
                      --Albert Einstein

                      Comment

                      • m4a1usr
                        Fast Electric Addict
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 2038

                        #161
                        Originally posted by 6sHyper
                        Sure it may be off by a mile an hour here and there but they are pretty damn accurate!
                        No they are not. Its a person such as yourself that doesnt research this class of information that passes along this typical BS misinformation.! Get off your AZZ. Do a search function of GPS using accuracy as your filter. Then look at the information that pops up! Then take 30 or 60 minutes and read COMPLETELY what is displayed on your screen with the 30 or more links! If your not smart enough to comprehend what has been presented for data then ask the questions you dont understand. Its not rocket science. I dont work for NASA. And I cant tell you who I do work for. But I sort of know GPS. At least more then you do by your comments. Stop spewing crap when you are uninformed!

                        The truth doesnt lay in your comprehension of the way things work. There is your opinion and the way the real world works. Speak facts to me. Cite me a software data adjustment or factual manufacturer data sheet indicating an accuracy reading greater then 85% in less then 2 seconds. Your not going to find it. There is no single receiver software algorithms using precise DOP. Know what that is? Dilution of Precision? A degradation of accuracy over time?

                        This is such a waste of time. Preaching about speed measurement accuracy when the readers dont even know the variables? Become informed. Learn how the technology works. Argue about the system capabilties knowing how it works, not the limited experience you have with a system.

                        John
                        Change is the one Constant

                        Comment

                        • TotalPackage
                          Banned
                          • Jul 2010
                          • 601

                          #162
                          Originally posted by m4a1usr
                          No they are not. Its a person such as yourself that doesnt research this class of information that passes along this typical BS misinformation.! Get off your AZZ. Do a search function of GPS using accuracy as your filter. Then look at the information that pops up! Then take 30 or 60 minutes and read COMPLETELY what is displayed on your screen with the 30 or more links! If your not smart enough to comprehend what has been presented for data then ask the questions you dont understand. Its not rocket science. I dont work for NASA. And I cant tell you who I do work for. But I sort of know GPS. At least more then you do by your comments. Stop spewing crap when you are uninformed!

                          The truth doesnt lay in your comprehension of the way things work. There is your opinion and the way the real world works. Speak facts to me. Cite me a software data adjustment or factual manufacturer data sheet indicating an accuracy reading greater then 85% in less then 2 seconds. Your not going to find it. There is no single receiver software algorithms using precise DOP. Know what that is? Dilution of Precision? A degradation of accuracy over time?

                          This is such a waste of time. Preaching about speed measurement accuracy when the readers dont even know the variables? Become informed. Learn how the technology works. Argue about the system capabilties knowing how it works, not the limited experience you have with a system.

                          John
                          Hey everybody we have to agree that gps can be off but it was still a good run deserving of congrats u can see the boats fast in the video.The question is will it hit 90? even on gps? Afterwards he can test them both in the real SAW trap.

                          Comment

                          • rearwheelin
                            Fast Electric Addict!
                            • Oct 2008
                            • 1941

                            #163
                            Originally posted by TotalPackage
                            Hey everybody we have to agree that gps can be off but it was still a good run deserving of congrats u can see the boats fast in the video.The question is will it hit 90? even on gps? Afterwards he can test them both in the real SAW trap.
                            His boat isn't legal for a namba SAW.....
                            "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."
                            --Albert Einstein

                            Comment

                            • Brushless55
                              Creator
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 9488

                              #164
                              .NAMBA20...Caterpillar UL-1, P-Spec OM29, P-Mono DF33, P-Spec JAE, Aussie 33" Hydro-LSH, Sprintcat CC2028 on 8s, PT SS45 Q Hydro, PS295 UL-1 power, OSE Brothers Outlaw QMono 4-sale, Rio 51z CC2028 on 8s

                              Comment

                              • rearwheelin
                                Fast Electric Addict!
                                • Oct 2008
                                • 1941

                                #165
                                Originally posted by m4a1usr
                                No they are not. Its a person such as yourself that doesnt research this class of information that passes along this typical BS misinformation.! Get off your AZZ. Do a search function of GPS using accuracy as your filter. Then look at the information that pops up! Then take 30 or 60 minutes and read COMPLETELY what is displayed on your screen with the 30 or more links! If your not smart enough to comprehend what has been presented for data then ask the questions you dont understand. Its not rocket science. I dont work for NASA. And I cant tell you who I do work for. But I sort of know GPS. At least more then you do by your comments. Stop spewing crap when you are uninformed!

                                The truth doesnt lay in your comprehension of the way things work. There is your opinion and the way the real world works. Speak facts to me. Cite me a software data adjustment or factual manufacturer data sheet indicating an accuracy reading greater then 85% in less then 2 seconds. Your not going to find it. There is no single receiver software algorithms using precise DOP. Know what that is? Dilution of Precision? A degradation of accuracy over time?

                                This is such a waste of time. Preaching about speed measurement accuracy when the readers dont even know the variables? Become informed. Learn how the technology works. Argue about the system capabilties knowing how it works, not the limited experience you have with a system.

                                John
                                I don't have the time to read an hour on GPS's but I do believe you are informed.....Basically what you are saying is a GPS needs over 2 seconds at a given speed to measure it at a 85% or better accuracy ? How many seconds to get a good reading granted the GPS in the boat isn't violently shaking more than a centimeter ? My boat had a GPS reading of 80.2 and a NAMBA SAW pass of 79mph........there were alot of variables too but I believe it is possible to measure the speed of your boat with a GPS...............
                                "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."
                                --Albert Einstein

                                Comment

                                Working...