Mah resitrictions

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Darin Jordan
    Fast Electric Addict!
    • Apr 2007
    • 8335

    #136
    Originally posted by T.S.Davis
    For the record. I am not yelling at Darin in any way. I'm not typing from the floor so I can kick my feet either.
    Honestly, I'd say that the only time these rules REALLY apply would be at a National event. Clubs can/will do whatever they want. That's how the "year worth of trial run" happens.

    Hard line on the rules... Yes... at some point, you need to do that. Then, when you realize how broken they really are, you argue online for 6-months.... Right??

    It's clearly that time... time for a review and rewrite in order to adapt. But, just like P-LTD motors... just because there is a new mouse-trap available, doesn't mean it should be included at a National event... not yet, I wouldn't think.
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

    Comment

    • rayzerdesigns
      Fast Electric Addict!
      • Dec 2013
      • 1228

      #137
      Originally posted by Darin Jordan
      Honestly, I'd say that the only time these rules REALLY apply would be at a National event. Clubs can/will do whatever they want. That's how the "year worth of trial run" happens.

      Hard line on the rules... Yes... at some point, you need to do that. Then, when you realize how broken they really are, you argue online for 6-months.... Right??

      It's clearly that time... time for a review and rewrite in order to adapt. But, just like P-LTD motors... just because there is a new mouse-trap available, doesn't mean it should be included at a National event... not yet, I wouldn't think.
      I do like how it has to be written then submitted and voted on for a rule change.. I think it makes the Nationals or s big event that wants to follow nambas rules.. Say we allow hv cells now.. Well that would leave a lot of people scrambling to get cells for nationals just a few months away..terry write the proposal and submit it.. Then we can start the new year off with new stuff..I will tell you that rosr has had the hv cells for a while testing them.. For well over 6 months and haven't approved them.. Which seems interesting.. I will also tell u u won't just throw an hv cell or cells straight into ur current p limited setup.. U will burn some stuff up.. U are adding rpms and heat.. I have tested with them.. But I am also all for them.. But until it's written up and submitted and voted on.. We have what we have.. They wouldn't be voted on till years end and legal if passed till next year..

      Comment

      • raptor347
        Fast Electric Addict!
        • Jul 2007
        • 1089

        #138
        I did quite a bit of reading last night and a couple phone calls this morning. Here's what we ended up with:
        -3.7V nominal, 4.23V max and capacity are part of the racing rules, not the safety rules.
        -You can sanction a race using HV cells, it should be stated on the race flier that these cells will be allowed and no records can be set.
        -You need to define the maximum pack voltages and capacity limits (if any) for the classes being run.
        -Make sure racers running standard cells aren't unsafely overcharging their cells to try to compete.

        You can legally run HV cells at the local level, no problem. Someone should be running them for a baseline if nothing else.

        The only events where the racing rules are truly set in stone are:
        -Any sanctioned event resulting in record applications
        -Nationals
        -Time trials.

        The safety rules are set in stone and everyone should take the time to reread them at the start of each season.

        Terry, you're covered. The Cup will be a great race, wish I had time and cash to make it back. The records thing is what it is. Think of the paperwork you won't have to do.

        With regard to P-ltd. IMPBA did it right. In all seriousness, I completely agree we made a mistake. It should never have been made a national class and definitely not a record legal class. The motors are inconsistent, even if we tore them down to the windings we wouldn't get reasonable spec ranges from different batches. I think we should get rid of that power catagory because it's truly un-techable. Please write the proposal and I'll happily back it.

        If anyone wants to talk to me directly, my phone number is in the contacts list on the NAMBA web site. I'm going to go splash some glue around the shop.
        Brian "Snowman" Buaas
        Team Castle Creations
        NAMBA FE Chairman

        Comment

        • T.S.Davis
          Fast Electric Addict!
          • Oct 2009
          • 6221

          #139
          We screwed the pooch on this when we added the charge voltages. Should have ditched the nominal wording then.

          Just what if'n.....

          Drop the mah restriction completely
          Lose the "3.7v nominal" wording

          This creates the transition phase that IMPBA is already into.

          Then specify a date after which we up the maximum charged voltage.
          Noisy person

          Comment

          • raptor347
            Fast Electric Addict!
            • Jul 2007
            • 1089

            #140
            Originally posted by Doug Smock
            Guys we are all very passionate about our hobby but we MUST keep this discussion on the surface.
            Thinking about your PM last night. Not feeling the love.
            Brian "Snowman" Buaas
            Team Castle Creations
            NAMBA FE Chairman

            Comment

            • T.S.Davis
              Fast Electric Addict!
              • Oct 2009
              • 6221

              #141
              Great stuff Brian. Thanks for the effort man. Really. Most of what you typed confirms what I thought I knew.

              Limited spec is an awesome set of classes and has been a boon to our hobby but being subject to the supply chain has been challenging. From manufacturing hiccups to manufacturer discontinuing entire motor lines. It's been endless. Guys have left FE over those cheap motors. But this was true of 700 motors too though. There was always controversy. I still would encourage clubs to run as close to the original spec as possible just for parity and participation. They're still the most contested classes at most major events.
              Noisy person

              Comment

              • T.S.Davis
                Fast Electric Addict!
                • Oct 2009
                • 6221

                #142
                Originally posted by raptor347
                -Make sure racers running standard cells aren't unsafely overcharging their cells to try to compete.
                Did this at the last cup. The highest voltage I found was a cheap O' Zippy pack. 4.21v. I was cruising the pits with the meter all weekend.

                I can't remember for sure but I don't think anyone applied for a record last cup.
                Noisy person

                Comment

                • Darin Jordan
                  Fast Electric Addict!
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 8335

                  #143
                  Originally posted by T.S.Davis
                  Should have ditched the nominal wording then.
                  Some of us TRIED!! Fears (that some might regard as irrational.. ) of future battery technologies caused the majority to feel those needed to be there.

                  How ironic...
                  Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
                  "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

                  Comment

                  • Darin Jordan
                    Fast Electric Addict!
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 8335

                    #144
                    Would it be valid to say that P-LTD could be run at the Nationals, but wouldn't be eligible for records or even official "National Championships"??

                    The class DOES bring a lot of blood to the events.

                    That being said, one of my previous rule thoughts on P-LTD motors would eliminate this problem, but would require people to get out of the RTR motor mentality, and adopt more of a "standardized motor parameter" through process. I suppose a list could still be provided. Much like ROAR.

                    Thoughts for another thread.

                    Sorry, not trying to "dominate the discussion". Just working a support session here today at work that doesn't need much support.
                    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
                    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

                    Comment

                    • T.S.Davis
                      Fast Electric Addict!
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 6221

                      #145
                      Originally posted by Darin Jordan
                      Would it be valid to say that P-LTD could be run at the Nationals, but wouldn't be eligible for records or even official "National Championships"??
                      Some complained that the mere participation numbers made an FE nats not a nats at all so I guess in keeping with tradition we call them interstellar championships.

                      I don't want to lose it either. It's our top seller so to speak.

                      The battery thing is going to require a crystal ball I think.
                      Noisy person

                      Comment

                      • raptor347
                        Fast Electric Addict!
                        • Jul 2007
                        • 1089

                        #146
                        I'm not saying stop running it. P-ltd is a great class. It's helped the hobby. It should still run at big races and as an exhibition class at nationals. Because of the tech issues, it shouldn't be an official/set in stone class or qualify for records.

                        Let's face it, stock/spec classes have a finite life span. When supplies of the critical component dry up, you find the next stock/spec class to fill the void.
                        Brian "Snowman" Buaas
                        Team Castle Creations
                        NAMBA FE Chairman

                        Comment

                        • raptor347
                          Fast Electric Addict!
                          • Jul 2007
                          • 1089

                          #147
                          Originally posted by T.S.Davis
                          The battery thing is going to require a crystal ball I think.
                          That particular cat is going to get continuously harder to herd.
                          Brian "Snowman" Buaas
                          Team Castle Creations
                          NAMBA FE Chairman

                          Comment

                          • Doug Smock
                            Moderator
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 5272

                            #148
                            Brian, we're good, just saw a little red my friend.

                            Good work, and thank you for your time, effort!

                            Guys FWIW I would stick with 4.23v/cell max. at races where HV packs are allowed. If not there will be guys kicking and screaming, and rightly so. We know there are gains to be had at the higher voltage, we don't need to prove that at a race such as The Michigan Cup.
                            Testing at the higher voltage can be done at the local level at fun runs. When the time comes to pull the trigger on the HV cells we'll have plenty of experience to draw from.

                            Again just my.02 FWIW
                            MODEL BOAT RACER
                            IMPBA President
                            District 13 Director 2011- present
                            IMPBA National Records Director 2009-2019
                            IMPBA 19887L CD
                            NAMBA 1169

                            Comment

                            • raptor347
                              Fast Electric Addict!
                              • Jul 2007
                              • 1089

                              #149
                              Originally posted by Doug Smock
                              Guys FWIW I would stick with 4.23v/cell max. at races where HV packs are allowed. If not there will be guys kicking and screaming, and rightly so. We know there are gains to be had at the higher voltage, we don't need to prove that at a race such as The Michigan Cup.
                              Testing at the higher voltage can be done at the local level at fun runs. When the time comes to pull the trigger on the HV cells we'll have plenty of experience to draw from.
                              All good.

                              I agree on the voltage for MI, but that's in Terry's court.
                              Brian "Snowman" Buaas
                              Team Castle Creations
                              NAMBA FE Chairman

                              Comment

                              • T.S.Davis
                                Fast Electric Addict!
                                • Oct 2009
                                • 6221

                                #150
                                We'll stay with the max charge in the book but we're not getting hung up on the nominal thing. I want to allow them but not by letting them spank all the 4.2v guys.
                                Noisy person

                                Comment

                                Working...