Well, I thought I'd try it for kicks. Run to run comparison resulted in favor of the Aluminum prop. I realize there are all sorts of variables (prop balance, sharpening, conditions, etc....), but the AL prop resulted in slightly higher MPH on the GPS. I took a pass with the Beryllium, swapped props, and took another pass with the Aluminum. So if anything, it didn't degrade the performance!
It makes sense that it would spin a little faster with less rotating mass (old car buffs used to reduce rotating mass under the hood.......crank, con-rods, etc...).
They sure are cool looking if anything. Our lake is extremely clean, so I don't have to worry about too many floaters that might cause damage.
I'm running a stock UL-1 with an AL X440 prop. So far, it's topped out at 43mph. If I could just get rid of the sponson dance, I could steel some more speed.
It makes sense that it would spin a little faster with less rotating mass (old car buffs used to reduce rotating mass under the hood.......crank, con-rods, etc...).
They sure are cool looking if anything. Our lake is extremely clean, so I don't have to worry about too many floaters that might cause damage.
I'm running a stock UL-1 with an AL X440 prop. So far, it's topped out at 43mph. If I could just get rid of the sponson dance, I could steel some more speed.
Comment