NEU 1515 2050 2d or 2200 1y

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Margeibel
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 29

    #1

    NEU 1515 2050 2d or 2200 1y

    Reading the posts I see a lot of people running NEU 2200 1y motor. Can someone explain the difference between 2050 2d and the 22001y. I looking to put one of thoughts motors in a Genesis. I have 180 esc 4s and 5s batteries. Upgraded strut, flex cable and shaft 3/16. Working on some re enforcing the body. Looking for speed in the 50s.
  • Fluid
    Fast and Furious
    • Apr 2007
    • 8011

    #2
    The biggest difference you would notice is the Kv. The 2050 will swing a slightly larger prop, the 2200 will spin a slightly smaller prop faster. Here is what the motor maker Aveox had to say about the two different winds. Read carefully, he is mostly talking about the advantages of building the two different motors, not the difference in performance. I'd get the 1Y motor.

    At Aveox, we have essentially deemed the Deltas as secondary to Wye winds in any application, except where a very high degree of uniformity in both directions is very important. Things like robots that move in both directions equally put up with the efficiency losses. Since the motors are very insensitive to timing changes (unlike the Wye winds), you don't have great performance in one direction, and poor in another(without adjusting the timing). You have good performance in both. (but it is not worth the losses in a model)"


    So basically the Wye will spool up faster and reach its top RPM a bit faster than the Delta wound motor. The Delta wound motor also consume more amperage than the Wye motor. If you want a hi-torque motor, the Wye-wind will let you do it with few turns. If you want speed, the Delta motor will let you do it without having to use difficult, thick wire or mess with parallel strands.



    ,
    ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for

    Comment

    • Margeibel
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2013
      • 29

      #3
      If you want a hi-torque motor, the Wye-wind will let you do it with few turns. If you want speed, the Delta motor will let you do it without having to use difficult, thick wire or mess with parallel strands.
      I am not understanding that, can someone translate that into newbee English. Thanks

      Comment

      • kfxguy
        Fast Electric Addict!
        • Oct 2013
        • 8746

        #4
        I think it was a typo. Im sure the end part is worded backwards
        32" carbon rivercat single 4s 102mph, 27” mini Rivercat 92mph, kbb34 91mph, jessej micro cat(too fast) was

        Comment

        • tlandauer
          Fast Electric Addict!
          • Apr 2011
          • 5666

          #5
          As Fluid has underlined in his post: this is from the motor maker's point of view. The Y motor has a better 0-60 performance ( more torque in a given kv or turns---some makers rate their motor with turns instead of kv) , the D motor is good with uniformed speed in both directions without the need to have timing complexities. The wire gauge and parallel strands are the windings in the stator.
          You can think of this as two internal combustion engines with the same/similar displacement but tuned for different purposes. One has 0-60 as priority, the other one is a high rpm screamer.
          Having used a Leopard 4082 2000kv D motor, I now prefer Y motor. I have a Neu 15151y in my Mean Machine and a Castle-Neu 15151y, love them both.
          I have read this many times and this is how I come to understand this paragraph, and also my observation with the motors I have . I hope I am right or at least partially correct. Never is my intention to steer anybody wrong. Let's see if my head is on the chopping block come morning!
          Too many boats, not enough time...

          Comment

          • jcald2000
            Senior Member
            • May 2008
            • 774

            #6
            The D wind also has much higher Ripple current back to the ESC, not good.

            Comment

            • Margeibel
              Junior Member
              • Jul 2013
              • 29

              #7
              Thanks I got it now.

              Comment

              • Mike Caruso
                Senior Member
                • May 2012
                • 940

                #8
                Originally posted by jcald2000
                The D wind also has much higher Ripple current back to the ESC, not good.
                Higher Ripple Current I did not not know that thanks.
                Do It Like You Mean It .....or Don't Bother

                Comment

                • Fluid
                  Fast and Furious
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 8011

                  #9
                  The D wind also has much higher Ripple current back to the ESC, not good.
                  Obvioiusly you have not compared many similar motors. Apples to apples - my 1527/1D (2300 Kv) has less ripple than my 1527/0.5Y (2500 Kv) does. Generalized statements comparing the draw of two winds are often not completely accurate - that's why I didn't give one to the OP. I haven't tested the OP's motors so I don't know.....


                  .
                  ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for

                  Comment

                  • Chilli
                    Fast Electric Addict!
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 3070

                    #10
                    I've run the D's and the Y's in heat racing and trials. IMHO if your is boat set up well, any difference in amp draw and ripple is negligible for the majority of boaters. I pick a motor based on the kv that I'm targeting. Like Jay said, the KV is the most important difference between the two motors you are looking at and you will have to prop accordingly. Oh... and don't forget the D winds like very low timing while most Y's somewhere around 10-15 degrees.
                    Mike Chirillo
                    www.capitolrcmodelboats.com

                    Comment

                    • jcald2000
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2008
                      • 774

                      #11
                      Jay, my source was Steve Nue in 2004, the key to the conversation may have been - at the same amps. I was looking at SAW at the time. There were papers on the internet showing the coil effect of the delta winds.

                      Comment

                      Working...