I've been considering a new project. Has anyone built one of these things? The specs say its exactly the same length and width of a mean machine. What's the difference? Would this make a good twin? Thanks
Sprintcat 21
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
-
-
No kiddin huh?
I've noticed they now have the fe version with a different cowl. No modding necessaryComment
-
it's the same bottom different top and cowl i wouldn't reccomend a twin in this boat unless you are doing a twin with spec motors and I would get the mean machine becasue it's much easier to work on inside. The Mini avenger is 36" and much better suited for twins could do a twin 6 cell or 4 cell setup. With anything from 2200Kv leopards or Neu's to Neu 1527/1Y's!!!! Hmmmm now you got me thinkin about doin one of these!!!!! maybe twin 1521/1.5D's on 4S!!! hmmmmm decisions decisions!!!We call ourselves the "Q"Comment
-
-
that hull will work well with just 1 ul1 motor, or any spec motor. I don't know if ur planning on racing it or just sport running, if racing you cant use twins in any of the P-lim classes.We call ourselves the "Q"Comment
-
Well, what difference is the 21 from the mean machine other than looks? The larger Sprintcat has a different hull bottom than the mm I think...? Does it not scale down well? If I were to build one as a single it would have a 1515 or larger for sure, but if the bottom is the same as my mm it doesn't really interest me.Comment
-
According to my conversation with Remy, the bottoms are identical between the MM and the SC21. Looks and aerodynamics are different. The bottoms of the MM and SC60/80 are very similar. The SC60/80 has a lifting strake on the bottom, the MM does not - because there is not room for one.
.ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for
Comment
-
According to my conversation with Remy, the bottoms are identical between the MM and the SC21. Looks and aerodynamics are different. The bottoms of the MM and SC60/80 are very similar. The SC60/80 has a lifting strake on the bottom, the MM does not - because there is not room for one.
.Comment
Comment