A better way to wire anti-spark device
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Guess my picture was cut off somehow. Current.jpg The red line (arrow) is the flow of current. egneg is correct as all the others who are stating it will have not effect.Last edited by SweetAccord; 10-05-2012, 12:17 PM.Comment
-
I will chime in hear as I have a little knowledge in this area being an electrician and remembered hearing someone talk about this in class(when your older you like learning new stuff).Currnet will travel all paths of resistance, even in parallel circiuts. ex. your house lights, receptacles all are parallel. everything thing works at the same time and all have different resistances. so if you leave the resistor pluged in it will consume some energy from your battery.
so better to disconnect the resistor
here is a good link for better explanation: http://www.mikeholt.com/technical.ph...ce?%20(2-8-2K)My private off road rc track
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC3H...yaNZNA&index=8Comment
-
Visual Inspection can turn up some failures, but it's not a sure bet.
A Huntron Tracker could check the Cap in circuit, but you'd have to map one out before it blew...and they are a pretty spendy tool.
Pulling the Cap to test is a real pain in the rear.
If I don't see a spark I discharge the Cap and try again. I've found the Caps bad on two AQ60 ESC's (older ones) this way and was able to replace them before any other damage occured.
I can think of better ways but they sure aren't easier!
What did you have in mind?Nortavlag Bulc
Comment
-
I'm pretty sure the companies like MGM, Schulze, etc. got their caps from a reliable source and not a massive overstock or discontinued bin of FETS. That is why they can give better warranties. I'm not sure if it's MGM that uses 2 Driver FET stages instead of one like 95% of all esc's out there including Castle. Doubling the driver FET stage really helps the esc be more reliable.Nortavlag Bulc
Comment
Comment