ProBoats New Line Up Flyer
Collapse
X
-
-
There are some design differences between the Pro Boat and the AQ motors that give slightly different advantages in different aspects of the power range/applications. I've dissected and studied all of these motors, so I have a pretty good idea on the strengths and weaknesses of each.
One thing that is interesting is that, although the AQ motors are listed and measure out to be 56mm (36-56-XXXX) vs the PB motors being 50 (36-50-XXXX), the internals, Stator and Rotor, length-wise, are identical. The AQ motors just have a longer can. It's the relationship of the rotor sizes to the stator, the air-gaps, and the magnet strength, that differs. One of these days, I may go further and tear apart the winds to see what the actual wiring difference is.
I think either can be competitive, if paired with the appropriate application...Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
"Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."Comment
-
I agree... The 1800KV motors from the Mystic/IM31, with the "1800KV" stamped on the endbell, seem to be better motors. The new Dynamite motors have shown to be good motors as well.
There are some design differences between the Pro Boat and the AQ motors that give slightly different advantages in different aspects of the power range/applications. I've dissected and studied all of these motors, so I have a pretty good idea on the strengths and weaknesses of each.
One thing that is interesting is that, although the AQ motors are listed and measure out to be 56mm (36-56-XXXX) vs the PB motors being 50 (36-50-XXXX), the internals, Stator and Rotor, length-wise, are identical. The AQ motors just have a longer can. It's the relationship of the rotor sizes to the stator, the air-gaps, and the magnet strength, that differs. One of these days, I may go further and tear apart the winds to see what the actual wiring difference is.
I think either can be competitive, if paired with the appropriate application...
I believe I had a 1800 from a Stilleto I don't remember the 1800 stamped. Been awhile though.
I find it odd the BJ29 is listed $20 higher then the IM31V2 yet have the same power. New hardware raising the price? PB/HH thinking of offering BnD or PnP versions of these new models?
Would love to get my hands on the new BJ29, a PnP would be more appealing or at least the BnD. Us old timers don't need another radio collecting dust. This is the first rtr I "plan" on only running stock. :rolleyes:
In the video it seems the bj29 doesn't have the mg/mystic bounce.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk 2Comment
-
I really don't have any idea how they come up with the Price-Points... Apparently they have their methods... I do know that manufacturing costs in China are going up. Probably a good idea to get used to that...Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
"Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."Comment
-
The prices did scare me a little bit around the $400 range now
I think add your own electronics model would be the hot ticket, lots of people swap them out anyway and try to sell them.Comment
-
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk 2Comment
-
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk 2Comment
-
I think they might be eliminating the Registered Mail system too (China). It's either by guppy mail or EMS in some cases I've seen like HK.
I like the red so much and with my Mrs.G in primer, I guess it's going to be red with my own decals.
It does look very nice in red!Nortavlag Bulc
Comment
-
I agree... The 1800KV motors from the Mystic/IM31, with the "1800KV" stamped on the endbell, seem to be better motors. The new Dynamite motors have shown to be good motors as well.
There are some design differences between the Pro Boat and the AQ motors that give slightly different advantages in different aspects of the power range/applications. I've dissected and studied all of these motors, so I have a pretty good idea on the strengths and weaknesses of each.
One thing that is interesting is that, although the AQ motors are listed and measure out to be 56mm (36-56-XXXX) vs the PB motors being 50 (36-50-XXXX), the internals, Stator and Rotor, length-wise, are identical. The AQ motors just have a longer can. It's the relationship of the rotor sizes to the stator, the air-gaps, and the magnet strength, that differs. One of these days, I may go further and tear apart the winds to see what the actual wiring difference is.
I think either can be competitive, if paired with the appropriate application...
DSC03291.JPGDSC03292.JPG
Hard to draw meaningfull conclusions without other specs (like magnet flux density and coil strength) but a casual observation leads me to surmise that the larger rotor in the PB creates (theoretically ) more torque thus allowing more prop yielding more acceleration and top end. Differences in current draw shouldn't be much of a factor given (at least in NAMBA P-Ltd classes) you're allowed to carry up to 10K mAh on board for an (approximately) 3 minute run.2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
'11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /MonoComment
-
AQ rotor on left - Proboat rotor on right.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]78722[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]78723[/ATTACH]
Hard to draw meaningfull conclusions without other specs (like magnet flux density and coil strength) but a casual observation leads me to surmise that the larger rotor in the PB creates (theoretically ) more torque thus allowing more prop yielding more acceleration and top end. Differences in current draw shouldn't be much of a factor given (at least in NAMBA P-Ltd classes) you're allowed to carry up to 10K mAh on board for an (approximately) 3 minute run.
There is a lot, also, not seen, underneath that magnet wrap. I know... I've sanded it off before!
The bottom line is still the "on any given Sunday" kind of theme... Either can put you where you need to be... You just have to tune for the system.Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
"Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."Comment
-
Tony... everything else would have to be equal for one to draw that conclusion. I'd suggest that AQ may be using better quality magnets, which allows them to use a smaller rotor diameter, and, accordingly, thicker Stator Iron material, so they may sink heat better. The smaller rotating mass may also result in a quicker acceleration (faster spool-up). The larger PB rotor (magnets being equal) would likely yield better low-end grunt, at the EXPENSE of top-end speed, however, it would also take more to bog it down once it's at speed (higher inertia, etc.)...
There is a lot, also, not seen, underneath that magnet wrap. I know... I've sanded it off before!
The bottom line is still the "on any given Sunday" kind of theme... Either can put you where you need to be... You just have to tune for the system.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk 2Comment
-
agreed. My 2 favorite spec motors (even though I don't race) are the aq2030 and the pb1500. That pb1500 is a freaking torque monster. To many "newbies" only see the kv rating and get scared away from it, young guys love retarded rpms... but when propped correctly that freaking 1500 is a beast.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk 2
There is another little tidbit I can tell you concerning the 1500 motors... but I'll have to wait to share that until, oh, let's say the 26th or so...Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
"Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."Comment
-
After our conversations I've dropped down to the AQ1800 on my MM P-Ltd offshore rig and propped up. (Wish I had the PB1500 to play with) but some history should be made on the 20thLast edited by properchopper; 06-11-2012, 03:46 PM.2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
'11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /MonoComment
-
Cool motor talk guys, I like it!
What is a decent prop for the AQ1800 ? or what do you use in your MM Tony?Nortavlag Bulc
Comment
-
Need to test for the best prop; will run the offshore course this week to find out. With more turns than the oval sprint course, pulling out of the tight turns will be critical. Starting out with a radically cut down X447/3 but2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
'11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /MonoComment
Comment