I was just wondering if anyone here has experience with their hardware? What is everyones opinion on having an inline rudder vs offset? Thanks
Mach 5 racing
Collapse
X
-
an offset rudder is more efficient because the rudder is out of the path of the prop.
Sorry, I haven't had any experience with their HW though"A quick temper will make a fool of you soon enough."
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Bruce Lee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -
Comment
-
OB,
When I built my Cesa 1882 into a proper boat with true hardware I bought the Mach5 hardware because it was cheap and I did not want to spend that much getting it up and going. My take is that it gets the job done and seems to be plenty strong, except for the rudder tube, fixed with a piece of 3/16 brass rod. Down side is that it is not pretty and haveing the in-line rudder is a royal PIA because you have to take the rudder off everytime you need to take the flex cable out. I run in salt water and I quickly found that this is manditory. Other then that it has been great, I have since moved it to my OM29 and must have close to 100 runs on it and it is still going strong.
Cheers,
JimComment
-
what about a dual rudder system would that work better than a inline and a offset???Failure is the First step to SUCCESSComment
-
I would suspect a duel rudder would work too. However, you will have additional weight and additional drag. I would also guess that you will need a larger, more powerful servo too.
Each setup has there perks and there short comings. It’s all about getting a setup that fits your driving style, your purpose (racing or playing), or scale appearance (the cool factor).
Comment
-
That sounds best to me. Good for L & R turns, rudder(s) is out of the prop path, Only issue I can see is weight."A quick temper will make a fool of you soon enough."
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Bruce Lee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Comment
Comment