LVC Devices - Any recommendations??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ctonez
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2007
    • 404

    #16
    Originally posted by Flying Scotsman
    Bye the Bye LVC @ 67% means nothing.
    Okay, that's a tad snide, but expected. From what I've read, Rex puts it best. The SV ESC cutoff is different than other typical ESC cutoffs in that it calculates a cutoff @ 67% of the input voltage instead of a voltage value...at least that's how I interpreted it. ...means nothing to YOU, but to others...??? who's to say?

    Originally posted by Flying Scotsman
    ...if your last post is correct.
    Why wouldn't it be? I have no reason to lie, and yet your comment implies you don't trust what I wrote...

    Comment

    • Flying Scotsman
      Fast Electric Adict!
      • Jun 2007
      • 5190

      #17
      A tad snide and expected.

      I suggest you keep your comments to yourself and let other people apart from me and you, discuss the original thread

      Comment

      • SJFE
        Fast Electric Addict!
        • Apr 2007
        • 4735

        #18
        No offence to either of you and furter more you are entitled to your opinions. That said I would suggest members start taking this type of thing to pm's. I am growing tired of seeing these non productive exchanges in the open forum.

        Comment

        • Flying Scotsman
          Fast Electric Adict!
          • Jun 2007
          • 5190

          #19
          Originally posted by SJFE
          No offence to either of you and furter more you are entitled to your opinions. That said I would suggest members start taking this type of thing to pm's. I am growing tired of seeing these non productive exchanges in the open forum.
          Thanks Tom. But in this case non productive is not true, A 67% value for cutoff is wrong and dangerous. A 4S LI-PO battery is rated at 14.8v if the battery is partially discharged the 67% rule will result in a damaged battery The cuttoff value must be by each cell

          Douggie
          Last edited by Flying Scotsman; 12-14-2007, 07:16 PM.

          Comment

          • Steven Vaccaro
            Administrator
            • Apr 2007
            • 8721

            #20
            Guys i see both sides of it, it was taken out of context. What looked like a slam, was a harmless jab at a fellow boater friend. Time to move on to the topic at hand.......
            Steven Vaccaro

            Where Racing on a Budget is a Reality!

            Comment

            • Steven Vaccaro
              Administrator
              • Apr 2007
              • 8721

              #21
              As far as the 67% percent. Take it for what it is. There is a reason Grim and AquaCraft have stated that this esc does NOT have a lvc. Because it is basic and will not cover all situations properly.
              Steven Vaccaro

              Where Racing on a Budget is a Reality!

              Comment

              • Ctonez
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2007
                • 404

                #22
                Originally posted by Flying Scotsman
                Thanks Tom. But in this case non productive is not true, A 67% value for cutoff is wrong and dangerous. A 4S LI-PO battery is rated at 14.8v if the battery is partially discharged the 67% rule will result in a damaged battery

                Douggie
                I did not intend to steer anyone the wrong way...just inputting the info I found through my searching... I have not tested this personally, hence attributing the info to the source of the quote.
                I have nothing personally against Flying Scotsman, I think we are both passionate about the hobby and value it's future.

                We should get together and listen to some vinyl over a glass of sumthin' tasty...
                I apologize for any terse or offensive comments, I value these forums a great deal and like many of you hate to see the good dialogue devolve into spitting matches.

                cheers,
                -Corey

                Comment

                • Flying Scotsman
                  Fast Electric Adict!
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 5190

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Ctonez
                  I did not intend to steer anyone the wrong way...just inputting the info I found through my searching... I have not tested this personally, hence attributing the info to the source of the quote.
                  I have nothing personally against Flying Scotsman, I think we are both passionate about the hobby and value it's future.

                  We should get together and listen to some vinyl over a glass of sumthin' tasty...
                  I apologize for any terse or offensive comments, I value these forums a great deal and like many of you hate to see the good dialogue devolve into spitting matches.

                  cheers,
                  -Corey
                  Thanks, Corey...Vinyl ..now you are talking i have a Dunlop turnntable circa 1982 cost then $1,500 the serial # is 003
                  Last edited by Flying Scotsman; 12-14-2007, 07:45 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Flying Scotsman
                    Fast Electric Adict!
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 5190

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Flying Scotsman
                    Thanks, Corey...Vinyl ..now you are talking i have a Dunlop turnntable circa 1982 cost then $1,500 the serial # is 003
                    Corey and I are now on a love fest over vinyl. Intersting how brothers become brothers

                    Comment

                    • SJFE
                      Fast Electric Addict!
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 4735

                      #25
                      Your right Doug it was productive. I think I made my point though....But vinyl...comon man that’s for siding and decals ...Digital rendering of tunes is where it's at. But I am wondering what’s in the bottle...I am thinking Grey Goose & some apple martinis myself

                      Comment

                      • raptor347
                        Fast Electric Addict!
                        • Jul 2007
                        • 1089

                        #26
                        A little note on the origin of the 67% cut off. It's the right percentage to work with the NiMH cells that the ESC was originally intended for. 0.9V/cell was pretty much the industry "safe" standard cutoff for NiMH. This is assuming a freshly charged pack of good cells.

                        An LVC is highly recomended.
                        Brian "Snowman" Buaas
                        Team Castle Creations
                        NAMBA FE Chairman

                        Comment

                        • Darin Jordan
                          Fast Electric Addict!
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 8335

                          #27
                          Originally posted by raptor347
                          A little note on the origin of the 67% cut off. It's the right percentage to work with the NiMH cells that the ESC was originally intended for. 0.9V/cell was pretty much the industry "safe" standard cutoff for NiMH. This is assuming a freshly charged pack of good cells.

                          An LVC is highly recomended.
                          Thanks Brian... and now that Brian has pulled this thread around full circle and provided a segway back to the beginning... (thanks Brian!! ) , Does anyone HAVE a recommendation??
                          Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
                          "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

                          Comment

                          • SJFE
                            Fast Electric Addict!
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 4735

                            #28
                            Darin the one I used was installed & used in my in my SV 27 longer than any other boat. I had it cut the power and pulce the boat in 3 or 4 times..I know I know not good...lol. But it proved the unit works!!!

                            Comment

                            • Darin Jordan
                              Fast Electric Addict!
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 8335

                              #29
                              Thanks Tom... I'll look into that one for sure...
                              Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
                              "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

                              Comment

                              • Flying Scotsman
                                Fast Electric Adict!
                                • Jun 2007
                                • 5190

                                #30
                                Darin, apart from the manufacturer you already mentioned and they are limited on cell count. I am of the same opinion as you, who does make a LI-PO cutoff device that meets the boating community requirements?

                                Comment

                                Working...