How does a castle 2028 compare to a lmt 3080/8 motor as i am not familiar with the lmt's. I am thinking on building a large cat hpr 233 with twin's did some checking on hpr site they have had success with the lmt setup on 12-14s in this hull speeds up to 80 mph. Is there a better or more comparable motor than the 2028.
lmt 3080/8 vs 2028
Collapse
X
-
Nothing better than an LMT. Cost is obviously higher than the 2028. What does your wallet say?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
The 2028 is a very strong performer on 10S. Club members run both 3080s and 2028s on 10S in various boats and while we have never run a scientific comparison, the Castle holds its own. Longevitywise, who knows.
.ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for
Comment
-
thank you for the reply i know this is a big hull to push butt dont want to break the bank building it. just finished my vx rocket tp 4060 1050 kv 8s x450 props got one run in before ice did ok for start. the 233 is a little bigger than i was looking at building in a cat but think the price is right to start. butshure i will need all the help i can get.Comment
-
Oscar, in the real world the 3080 and 2028 are not that far apart, seen it too many times in the club. For SAW or zip zip running the Lehner wins, but for 90% of real-world running they are closer than the numbers say. The Kvs can't be the same, Lehners are rated under load, Castles are not. The 2028 needs a higher Kv to be comparable.
.
.ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for
Comment
-
Oscar, in the real world the 3080 and 2028 are not that far apart, seen it too many times in the club. For SAW or zip zip running the Lehner wins, but for 90% of real-world running they are closer than the numbers say. The Kvs can't be the same, Lehners are rated under load, Castles are not. The 2028 needs a higher Kv to be comparable.
.
.Comment
-
Also note that the Lehners are rated with D wind using 15 degree of timing..
RPM table
Series 10xx 15xx 19xx 22xx 30xx
Specified rpms can vary due to the production process about +/- 4%
RPM/Volt at max. efficiency (under load)
rpms are determined with 15° timingComment
-
ok so i got this right need bigger than 2028 will do a tp 5680 options 800 kv or 1070 kv.
example: 56803y 1070kv 10s is 39,590 rpm using x465/3 prop
56804y 800kv 12s is 35,520 rpm using x465/3 prop
will the 800kv setup have more power and less amp draw or is it not much difference? enjoying the input certainly helps.Comment
-
The 800 will totally use less amps, likely more torque and will spin that prop easier.
I should state: lower KV and higher voltage to gain the same rpm IS less amps. It can be a trade off, less Mah on board but more cells as far as weight/space goes.Last edited by srislash; 12-21-2016, 10:49 PM.Comment
-
The boat im looking at building is 22 in x 92 in space is not an issue LOL. The boat with those motors 300 amp esc's 8-6s battery's will be about 60 lbs. do you think that the motors will push that maybe like 50-60 with those props. By the way my mono worked out good using your suggestion's thank's.
May be a little crazy on this one LOL. but love a good challenge.Comment
-
I have not run a boat that large but my pal LoneWolf is running a 185 now and he is getting familiar with props size and such on the larger vessels. I'll be conversing with him today and I'll point him this way.
But with my observations I think you should have a viable system. Likely better than 50-60mph with the right props.
This will be the decision making, starting props! They are a decent size and not cheap.Comment
Comment