TP power brushless motor.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SSchevy
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 9

    #1

    TP power brushless motor.

    Hi,



    whether the TP power brushless motors with high quality?



  • 785boats
    Wet Track Racing
    • Nov 2008
    • 3169

    #2
    I don't have the one you linked to, but I have a couple of the 4082 2180kv motors in a hydro & a mono & they out perform the same size Leopards I've tried in the same boats any day. More efficient, more power & less heat with the same prop, battery & laps.
    Just my thoughts & observations.
    See the danger. THEN DO IT ANYWAY!!!
    http://forums.offshoreelectrics.com/...hp?albumid=319
    http://forums.offshoreelectrics.com/...hp?albumid=320

    Comment

    • znus
      Broke, as usual
      • Jun 2011
      • 120

      #3
      TP Power are great! They deserve way more recognition than they get.
      25" Arrowana with Etti 2970 3300kV. RCMK Flying Cat with twin HOR Outboards. 2 x SSS 4092 2140kV. Faluga 45" with Leo 56110 620 kv on 12s.

      Comment

      • Brushless55
        Creator
        • Oct 2008
        • 9488

        #4
        Originally posted by 785boats
        I don't have the one you linked to, but I have a couple of the 4082 2180kv motors in a hydro & a mono & they out perform the same size Leopards I've tried in the same boats any day. More efficient, more power & less heat with the same prop, battery & laps.
        Just my thoughts & observations.
        sounds good!

        why have I heard TP motors are a hit or miss?
        .NAMBA20...Caterpillar UL-1, P-Spec OM29, P-Mono DF33, P-Spec JAE, Aussie 33" Hydro-LSH, Sprintcat CC2028 on 8s, PT SS45 Q Hydro, PS295 UL-1 power, OSE Brothers Outlaw QMono 4-sale, Rio 51z CC2028 on 8s

        Comment

        • martin
          Fast Electric Addict!
          • Aug 2010
          • 2887

          #5
          Steven Vaccaro tested a TP 4092 1800kv & Leopard 4092 1730kv both on 6s in a 36" DF cat hull both on x450 prop, the TP ran 60mph & the Leopard 67mph. He said the Leopard had so much torque that he had a use i believe 10,000 mah batteries over the 5000mah he had previously used to get more weight in the boat & still ran 65mph with the Leopard.

          Comment

          • jcald2000
            Senior Member
            • May 2008
            • 774

            #6
            Sounds like one was a deta wind and one was a Y wind???

            Comment

            • Brushless55
              Creator
              • Oct 2008
              • 9488

              #7
              Originally posted by martin
              Steven Vaccaro tested a TP 4092 1800kv & Leopard 4092 1730kv both on 6s in a 36" DF cat hull both on x450 prop, the TP ran 60mph & the Leopard 67mph. He said the Leopard had so much torque that he had a use i believe 10,000 mah batteries over the 5000mah he had previously used to get more weight in the boat & still ran 65mph with the Leopard.
              I remember that thread he started...
              .NAMBA20...Caterpillar UL-1, P-Spec OM29, P-Mono DF33, P-Spec JAE, Aussie 33" Hydro-LSH, Sprintcat CC2028 on 8s, PT SS45 Q Hydro, PS295 UL-1 power, OSE Brothers Outlaw QMono 4-sale, Rio 51z CC2028 on 8s

              Comment

              • martin
                Fast Electric Addict!
                • Aug 2010
                • 2887

                #8
                The specs ive seen on both motors they are both D winds.
                Leopard 3D no load current 4.5a.
                TP 6D 2.5a.

                Comment

                • Basstronics
                  Fast Electric Addict!
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 2345

                  #9
                  I just picked up a used 4084 2200 KV.

                  It wont be a fair comparison though because my Leopard if a 4074 2200 KV.

                  Initial thoughts- WAY stronger magnets. This thing cogs like a hog!
                  42" Osprey, 32" Pursuit, 26" Bling Rocket (rescue), Blizzard Rigger, JAE 21FE rigger, Hobby King rigger (RIP)

                  Comment

                  • martin
                    Fast Electric Addict!
                    • Aug 2010
                    • 2887

                    #10
                    incease in cogging is no indication of a more powerfull motor.

                    Comment

                    • Basstronics
                      Fast Electric Addict!
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 2345

                      #11
                      Increase in magnet strength is an indication of more torque.

                      I could have both rotors Gaussed...
                      42" Osprey, 32" Pursuit, 26" Bling Rocket (rescue), Blizzard Rigger, JAE 21FE rigger, Hobby King rigger (RIP)

                      Comment

                      • keithbradley
                        Fast Electric Addict!
                        • Jul 2010
                        • 3663

                        #12
                        Originally posted by martin
                        Steven Vaccaro tested a TP 4092 1800kv & Leopard 4092 1730kv both on 6s in a 36" DF cat hull both on x450 prop, the TP ran 60mph & the Leopard 67mph. He said the Leopard had so much torque that he had a use i believe 10,000 mah batteries over the 5000mah he had previously used to get more weight in the boat & still ran 65mph with the Leopard.
                        There was obviously a variable that had not been accounted for. If he used 10,000mah for one and 5,000mah for the other, that could be the difference.
                        I have tested a number of Leopard and TP motors and I have not experienced this phenomenon. That test is not a fair representation/comparison of motors.
                        www.keithbradleyboats.com

                        Comment

                        • martin
                          Fast Electric Addict!
                          • Aug 2010
                          • 2887

                          #13
                          He tested them both with 5000mah & got 60mph & 67mph, he then fitted 10,000mah with the Leopard to increase weight to help with the torque problem & still got 65mph.

                          Comment

                          • keithbradley
                            Fast Electric Addict!
                            • Jul 2010
                            • 3663

                            #14
                            So it went slower on 2p?
                            I think he needs to re-test. I suspect that 67mph reading was innaccurate.
                            www.keithbradleyboats.com

                            Comment

                            • martin
                              Fast Electric Addict!
                              • Aug 2010
                              • 2887

                              #15
                              I believe he used 2 3s 5000mah in series for the 60mph & 67mph runs.

                              Comment

                              Working...