which is better the castle 200,240 hv esc or the schulze 40.160 as in performance?
which is better a castle 200hv or a schulze?
Collapse
X
-
Sorry, I'm a total slappy for Castle but the Schulze is a higher performance unit. Smooth as warm butter. The Schulze is probably under rated at 160 amps too. Think of it like comparing a Shelby Mustang to a Porsche Carrera GT. Sure the Mustang will rip a hole out out of the pavement......but the Porsche makes the hair on your neck stand up.
Just check on compatibility with your motor choice first.
I've been impressed with Fightercat ESC's but haven't actually run one myself yet.Noisy personComment
-
I would argue the better controller heavily depends on the application and which motor. Schulzes are definite powerhouses, however the current spec controllers do have some issues with Neu and other motors. The older 40.160wk's are very versatile, but getting rare and sought after. I have tested 200 ICE's, 40.160's, 32.200's and 40.303's. Specifically if you plan on running a Lehner, the Schulzes are going to be a solid combo. If you are running something else I would expand your search and look at other controllers too.
Ben (fightercat's) esc's as well as Swordfish's have proved out well in a number of applications.
If you plan on running 8S and below, the Castle ICE 240 is an excellent controller for the money.
TylerTyler Garrard
NAMBA 639/IMPBA 20525
T-Hydro @ 142.94mph former WRComment
-
That's what I meant by check compatibility. I think the Schulze struggles with the big Plett too.
I run a lot of Castles myself. In everything I own at the moment. However, if given an ICE240 I wouldn't run it. I won't run what I can't trust.Noisy personComment
-
I've run the Schulzes with some very high current set-ups and logged around 450A continous. I have also run the ICE240's at some very high currents around 450A too. Although these two differ drastically the ICE 240 is becoming one of my favorites. I have only failed them due to exetreme punishment during SAW racing.
TylerTyler Garrard
NAMBA 639/IMPBA 20525
T-Hydro @ 142.94mph former WRComment
-
However, if given an ICE240 I wouldn't run it. I won't run what I can't trust.
.ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for
Comment
-
i was selling the airplane version ice 100 & 200 for quite a while before the boat version came out. i also personally still use them in boats with added cooling and waterproofing. as far as i can remember there were zero issues.Steven Vaccaro
Where Racing on a Budget is a Reality!Comment
-
Will the schulze 40-303wk hold together without frying with the cc2028 with a 70mm prop on 10s ive tried a couple of ESC's and over amped them.
.ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for
Comment
-
Schulze any day..how many recalls have there been vs Castles controllers.Grand River Marine Modellers
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...ne%20modellersComment
-
I know, I know. After the third one failed I quit trying. I had them send me another Hydra 240 instead of another ICE. I SO wanted them to work as I really am a Castle superfreak. The ICE never went thermal nuclear. They just stopped working. Servo still live. No throttle. One of them only managed a couple feet before it stopped working. I took the ICE out and dropped in a Hydra 240LV and beat the poo out of it all summer. Got it wet a bunch o' times too. Love the old version. I still think the H240LV is the best bang for the buck speedo since the old SC-3 stuff Andy was selling.
The Fighter cat units will be the next ESC's I torture.
What ever happened to Hacker? They were headed in the right direction with the 77 that looked much like the Turnigy unit. Then I don't know what happened.Noisy personComment
-
I have yet to test a 2028 and a 40.300 oe 32.200 combo, but it's on my list as well as testing the 2028 with a ICE240 on 8S. I would expect you could run a 2028 on 8S with 65-70mm props with low pitch ratio's on a cat/rigger/sport hydro, but a mono I would start around 60mm and check currents. 10S is going to pull quite a few more amps so start in the 55-60mm range. I have tried a 2215 1.5Y with a 40.300 and failed the 40.300. I am 99% sure its mostly a software issue. I have had one 32.200wk work flawlessy with that 2215 1.5Y on 8S and 10S, but other 32.200's were no good. All of them were brand new.Tyler Garrard
NAMBA 639/IMPBA 20525
T-Hydro @ 142.94mph former WRComment
-
just a question: When you consider to buy a Schulze 303 or maybe 333 for that money it costs (VERY expensive), wouldn't it make sense to also use a motor like a NEU 22's series?
Maybe a bit more info about the desired application would make sense (hull, lipos, prop, speed, runtime, budet,...)?
Best regards,
ManuelComment
-
Manuel,
I wish this was true! As expensive and high qaulity as the Schulzes are I would expect the same, but my experience has not been so. On Schulze's behalf though they have been excellent about repairing units at very reasonable costs. I think I will ship them a couple sample Neu & Castle Neu motors ranging from 1515's to 2028's to test with their controllers the next time I send a controller back for repair. I believe they just don't have access to a variety of Neu/Castle/Leopard motors to be able to develop the control algorythms. The Lehners being an ironless design has signifigantly different characteristics than the iron core stator Neu's. Enough difference to casue problems in the controls.
my 2 cents.
TylerTyler Garrard
NAMBA 639/IMPBA 20525
T-Hydro @ 142.94mph former WRComment
-
FWIW There are twenty current IMPBA FE records with the Shultze/Neu combination.MODEL BOAT RACER
IMPBA President
District 13 Director 2011- present
IMPBA National Records Director 2009-2019
IMPBA 19887L CD
NAMBA 1169Comment
Comment