HiFi sound. Which do you think sound better?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • domwilson
    Moderator
    • Apr 2007
    • 4408

    #1

    HiFi sound. Which do you think sound better?

    What do you guys think sound better? Old equipment or new equipment; What and why?
    Government Moto:
    "Why fix it? Blame someone else for breaking it."
  • RCprince
    Fast Electric Addict!
    • Jul 2007
    • 1637

    #2
    33's and 45's
    Samuel Johnson - “An injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere.” William Cooper "listen to everything, read everything, and believe nothing unless you can prove it in your own research!"

    Comment

    • domwilson
      Moderator
      • Apr 2007
      • 4408

      #3
      why?
      Government Moto:
      "Why fix it? Blame someone else for breaking it."

      Comment

      • bwells
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 842

        #4
        33's over 45's plus they have more stuff on them along with the scratches. 45's are going way back

        Comment

        • Ub Hauled
          Fast Electric Addict!
          • Aug 2007
          • 3031

          #5
          I like the warmth of the Tube amps... sound so pretty!
          :::::::::::::::. It's NEVER fast enough! .:::::::::::::::

          Comment

          • RCprince
            Fast Electric Addict!
            • Jul 2007
            • 1637

            #6
            Originally posted by domwilson
            why?
            it's a more sensual sound. Digital music sounds to artificial, to perfect and clean.
            Samuel Johnson - “An injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere.” William Cooper "listen to everything, read everything, and believe nothing unless you can prove it in your own research!"

            Comment

            • domwilson
              Moderator
              • Apr 2007
              • 4408

              #7
              I like the sound of vinyl. Older amps (before 1996) sound better to me as well.
              Government Moto:
              "Why fix it? Blame someone else for breaking it."

              Comment

              • Flying Scotsman
                Fast Electric Adict!
                • Jun 2007
                • 5190

                #8
                Tube/valve amps and preamps... modern turntables and arms with mc cartridges...sweet sound with great frequency range. You can not beat it

                Douggie

                Comment

                • domwilson
                  Moderator
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 4408

                  #9
                  Alot of older speakers sound great too.
                  Government Moto:
                  "Why fix it? Blame someone else for breaking it."

                  Comment

                  • 785boats
                    Wet Track Racing
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 3169

                    #10
                    I still run an old set of Polk Audio Mk 7 speakers with a Harman Kardon Amp & a Rotel turntable. All bought in the late 70's or early 80's.
                    Sounds smoother & sweeter than a lot of modern setups I've heard.
                    More mellow with bright crisp highs & more depth in the midrange. And a bass that you can feel the vibrations of, not just a dull thump like some that I've heard.
                    Paul.
                    Last edited by 785boats; 07-28-2009, 02:37 PM.
                    See the danger. THEN DO IT ANYWAY!!!
                    http://forums.offshoreelectrics.com/...hp?albumid=319
                    http://forums.offshoreelectrics.com/...hp?albumid=320

                    Comment

                    • domwilson
                      Moderator
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 4408

                      #11
                      The audio industry, for the more "popular brands" has resorted back to the marketing hype and strategies of the late 60's, early 70's. Overly enthusiastic specs and claims.
                      For example: CD's are supposed to have superior audio qualities to that of analog vinyl or tape. SACD's have audio quality approaching the clarity and definition of analog. So which is it?

                      Since 1997 the way amplifier output is measured has changed. It used to be RMS power output, both channels driven, across a certain frequency range. Now it is 1 channel driven at whatever frequency (usually 1khz). So that home theater receiver that boasts 120 watts per channel? Probably 75-80 watts in reality. But this also depends on the design, manufacturer, etc. With audio these days, the old saying definitely applies, "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is." No pun intended.
                      Government Moto:
                      "Why fix it? Blame someone else for breaking it."

                      Comment

                      • 785boats
                        Wet Track Racing
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 3169

                        #12
                        You're right there Dom. They measure in Peak power because it sounds so much more than R.M.S.
                        The wife recently bought one of those turntables that allow you to download a record into the computer & copy onto a CD.
                        It will be interesting to see if the copy maintains the original qualities of the record or loses the depth & warmth in the digital translation.
                        I must get it set up & give it a go.
                        Cheers.
                        Paul.
                        See the danger. THEN DO IT ANYWAY!!!
                        http://forums.offshoreelectrics.com/...hp?albumid=319
                        http://forums.offshoreelectrics.com/...hp?albumid=320

                        Comment

                        • Flying Scotsman
                          Fast Electric Adict!
                          • Jun 2007
                          • 5190

                          #13
                          Originally posted by domwilson
                          The audio industry, for the more "popular brands" has resorted back to the marketing hype and strategies of the late 60's, early 70's. Overly enthusiastic specs and claims.
                          For example: CD's are supposed to have superior audio qualities to that of analog vinyl or tape. SACD's have audio quality approaching the clarity and definition of analog. So which is it?

                          Since 1997 the way amplifier output is measured has changed. It used to be RMS power output, both channels driven, across a certain frequency range. Now it is 1 channel driven at whatever frequency (usually 1khz). So that home theater receiver that boasts 120 watts per channel? Probably 75-80 watts in reality. But this also depends on the design, manufacturer, etc. With audio these days, the old saying definitely applies, "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is." No pun intended.
                          An interesting statement many tube amps of that era with low RMS per channel would easily outperform and drive difficult speaker loads than many touted transistor amps. Car amp specs...do not get me started. I have CD, SACD and believe me a good vinyl system is the way to go. MP3 and likes, no comment!

                          Douggie

                          Comment

                          • Flying Scotsman
                            Fast Electric Adict!
                            • Jun 2007
                            • 5190

                            #14
                            The real point here is most new mediums and distributors of audio compress the original source. That is why your FM, satellite radio, MP3, TV, sound is less than stellar. It also applies to video, that HD TV signal is also compressed.

                            Douggie
                            Last edited by Flying Scotsman; 07-29-2009, 12:49 PM.

                            Comment

                            • domwilson
                              Moderator
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 4408

                              #15
                              Tube amps are more stable driving low impedance loads and don't clip as hard as transistors do. Even with the high compression of todays entertainment formats, when played on older amps/receivers sound noticeably better. I took a Ipod and hooked it up to my home theater reciever and it wasn't as detailed. Then I used the same ipod, same speakers, and hooked it up to a older receiver and the sound difference was very noticeable. It sounded clearer, with more definition on the older unit.
                              Government Moto:
                              "Why fix it? Blame someone else for breaking it."

                              Comment

                              Working...