FoxNews is becoming clearer Eveyday

[RCprince]

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/fox-pie-chart/

They say in public speaking you must always craft your speech in away to include the majority of your listening audience, which reading comprehension is on a 6th grade level. I think FOXNEWS is starting to do their math on a preschool level...and how many viewers they have? smh. 70% + 63% + 60% = 193% you flipping imbeciles.

[Bill-SOCAL]

70% + 63% + 60% = 193% you flipping imbeciles.

You're the imbecile. Diebold owns the voting machines and this is entirely possible. Jeesh!!

[RCprince]

I should have guessed But wait check this out lol....

In wake of misleading Palin footage, Fox News institutes ‘zero tolerance for on-screen errors.’

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/fox-news-memo/

[domwilson]

Effective When? Can't be anytime soon. Maybe, stardate 2352.5

[RCprince]

Effective When? Can't be anytime soon. Maybe, stardate 2352.5

It didn't apply to this mishap.

[Bill-SOCAL]

I should have guessed But wait check this out lol....

In wake of misleading Palin footage, Fox News institutes ‘zero tolerance for on-screen errors.’

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/fox-news-memo/

I saw that. I am expecting a lot of dead air if they are going to be forced to broadcast actual facts that can be verified.

[Steven Vaccaro]

Gee for a bunch of guys that don't like the network, you seem to give them allot of attention.

[RCprince]

Gee for a bunch of guys that don't like the network, you seem to give them allot of attention.

It's not that I don't like the Network! just certain commentators who take advantage people inability to differentiate commentary from news. I love FRINGE and I watch local foxnews sometimes.

[Bill-SOCAL]

Gee for a bunch of guys that don't like the network, you seem to give them allot of attention.

Keeping track of their nearly endless stream of twisted reporting helps me to understand how so many seemingly otherwise intelligent sounding people can be so terribly misinformed

[domwilson]

Gee for a bunch of guys that don't like the network, you seem to give them allot of attention.

I admit I watch. Just to keep in balance. Most media outlets are bias'd to one side or the other. I like to get both sides and look for the commonality in the reporting. Plus, some of their commentators are funny in their ignorance and the conclusions they draw on limited or no information.

[domwilson]

Plus Glenn Beck looks like a real life adult Bart Simpson....

[Steven Vaccaro]

Keeping track of their nearly endless stream of twisted reporting helps me to understand how so many seemingly otherwise intelligent sounding people can be so terribly misinformed

Ya but I think other networks are crap and dont feel some need to watch them. Seems its maybe an obsession for some people.

[Darin Jordan]

Sorry guys... I don't have time to participate in this conversation... watching "Lie to Me" on Channel 113 (KCPQD Fox HD), then have to race over to 655 (FNCHD Fox News Channel HD) to catch Gretta...

You'll have to carry on without me...

[domwilson]

In reality...This is all trivial. It's really not worth people getting their feathers ruffled. Let's all agree that the media in general has let us down, Beck is a chowderhead and the world is a ghetto.

But seriously, News has taken on the form of entertainment to attract viewers. We're not getting the full truthful story on events and there is too much blame to just saddle it down to one person or administration. You choose to listen to who you want because in reality we can't change things on the whole. But we can change things in our own little ways by being nice to one another and respecting each others choices. So with that, I choose not to believe many of the things that the commentators on Fox tell us.

[AndyKunz]

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/23/fox-pie-chart/

They say in public speaking you must always craft your speech in away to include the majority of your listening audience, which reading comprehension is on a 6th grade level. I think FOXNEWS is starting to do their math on a preschool level...and how many viewers they have? smh. 70% + 63% + 60% = 193% you flipping imbeciles.

I would back two of those three, so there's 200% right there. With Sadistics you have to know what the question is before you analyze the answer. If the question was, "Which of the following three potential candidates would you back for President in 2012?" then it's easily possible to come up with 300% as a total.

If the question were, "Pretend these three people are on the primary ballot. Which would you vote for?" then you can only get 100% total.

I don't see the question on the picture.

Andy