BEST Trump video EVER

[Panther6834]

This is, hands-down, the ABSOLUTE BEST & FUNNIEST video you will ever see about Donald Trump...staring Donald Trump AND Donald Trump:

https://youtu.be/W7rJp2Tx7vc

~ More peace, love, laughter, & kindness would make the world a MUCH better place

[HTVboats]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4b-dannQQ0Q

If you can't get to a rally take 12 minutes and watch, your new friends are just "beautiful" "like nothing you've ever seen before" "you'll see"

Mic
Funny and "pathetic"

[Panther6834]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4b-dannQQ0Q

If you can't get to a rally take 12 minutes and watch, your new friends are just "beautiful" "like nothing you've ever seen before" "you'll see"

Mic
Funny and "pathetic"

Finally had the time to watch the video...hilarious...shows exactly how ignorant Trump supporters truly are.


~ More peace, love, laughter, & kindness would make the world a MUCH better place

[NativePaul]

Doh, I was assuming it was going to be a JFK style video.

If he was a dictator I would feel sorry for you guys, but you voted him in knowing full well what an idiot he is, so I just gotta laugh.

[Panther6834]

Doh, I was assuming it was going to be a JFK style video.

If he was a dictator I would feel sorry for you guys, but you voted him in knowing full well what an idiot he is, so I just gotta laugh.

Actually, "The People" did NOT vote him in...he LOST the popular vote, and by more than a reasonable margin. Unfortunately, when it comes to voting in the US, 'popular vote' matters for everything, EXCEPT presidential voting. For that, we (unfortunately) have this IDIOTIC thing called the "Electoral College". Honestly, the Electoral College should be DISBANDED, and the "popular vote" is what SHOULD count. Reading up on this ridiculous method of voting for the president is 'interesting' reading...but, to save those reading this the trouble, I'll give you the 'Cliff Notes' version.

The Electrical College is made up of a 'select' 538 people. The first 100 represent the two senators from each state. The remaining 438 are based on each state's population - essentially, one Electoral College member for each 'X' number of people, divided into districts. Thus the reason California has more Electoral College members than any other state. However, here's where things start to get screwy.

First, while each Electoral College member is SUPPOSED to cast their vote based on the "popular vote" of their district, there is NOTHING rewiring them to do so. 100% of the "popular vote" of any district could be for 'candidate A', but that Electoral College member could cast his/her Electoral College vote for 'candidate B'. I could even turn that info something funny, as that same messenger could cast his/her "popular vote" for 'candidate A', and still place the Electoral College vote for 'candidate B'. This could, potentially, make it VERY EASY for a candidate to purchase his/her way into the presidency - just find enough Electoral College member that might be planning to vote for your opponent, and pay them to vote for you.

The second part of the Electoral College screwiness is how each state places their Electoral College votes. Using California for this example, California has 55 Electoral College votes...but, that does NOT mean each individual vote goes towards the candidate that each Electoral College member voted for. No, that would be to easy. Instead, the Electoral College votes of each state are tabulated, and whichever candidate has the highest number of Electoral College votes, ALL of the votes for that state go to that candidate. Using California as an example, if 27 Electoral College members view for 'candidate A', and 28 members vote for 'candidate B's, 'candidate B's gets ALL 55 votes.

Is our presidential voting system starting to seem like the MOST SCREWED UP voting system ever? This "problem" is how Trump won in 2016...he did NOT win the popular vote. There's even a (very) strong possibility that he "bought" his way into the White House, by 'buying' votes from Electoral College members who were "undecided". Now, I'm NOT claiming this as "fact" (I don't do things the way Trump does, pulling "facts" out of his a$$)...only stating it as a (strong) possibility. Either way, our presidential election system NEEDS to be replaced with the "popular" vote, not the current system that is so screwed up, it's NOT funny.


~ More peace, love, laughter, & kindness would make the world a MUCH better place

[Steven Vaccaro]

There are enough other places that talk politics. Id rather not start fighting on here.

if we can keep this name calling free and a rational debate, we can keep this up, otherwise it will disappear.

BTW I like how the electoral college works. We dont need, Florida, ny and California deciding the direction of the entire country.

[Panther6834]

There are enough other places that talk politics. Id rather not start fighting on here.

if we can keep this name calling free and a rational debate, we can keep this up, otherwise it will disappear.

BTW I like how the electoral college works. We dont need, Florida, ny and California deciding the direction of the entire country.

I'm in agreement on everything said, except for the Electoral College part. For one thing, it can actually lead to CA, NY, & FL "controlling" the election. By allowing the popular vote to be the controlling factor...exactly as it is for everything else...it would "level the playing field", so to speak. I live in CA, and, like you, I believe CA has too much 'power'. Just because we have the highest population doesn't mean we should have any more say.

I believe the system...ALL systems...should be equal. This isn't a 'political' belief...it's a 'human' belief. George Orwell's novel, "Animal Farm", is a perfect example of this. There's a well-known line from the novel, "All animals are created equal, but some animals are created more equal than others." He wrote that line to explain the problems within our political system...but, the trim is, that one line explains the 'problem' with most current systems, from political to corporate, from law enforcement to the hierarchy within churches.

In some ways, each of these "systems" operates on a manner similar to how did dealers operate - they give you a low-priced, or free, 'taste'...then, once they have you "hooked", they control you...and, they use that to their advantage. Again, I'm not just referring to politics, but to almost every "organised" entity. It's a sad truth...but, a truth, nonetheless. Within our political system, both sides - Democrats & Republicans - are guilty of it.


~ More peace, love, laughter, & kindness would make the world a MUCH better place

[Panchothedog]

Mr. Panther6834
I am a 72 year old native Californian and a Trump voter. I take a strong
disliking to everything you have said. At Steve's requests I will keep it
clean and just say you have a lot to learn.

[Doug Smock]

Mr. Panther6834
I am a 72 year old native Californian and a Trump voter. I take a strong
disliking to everything you have said. At Steve's requests I will keep it
clean and just say you have a lot to learn.

[larryrose11]

I for one, LOVE to learn, especially from ones with a different point of view.
If they can articulate their point of view well, even better.
I alslo love this forum: It never gets uncivil, and is respectfull, and evidence driven.

Would it be worth while to have a place for civil discussion, outside of Meme-land, name calling, social media?
I say this assuming we can police ourselves, just as Panchothedog has done.

[Panther6834]

Mr. Panther6834
I am a 72 year old native Californian and a Trump voter. I take a strong
disliking to everything you have said. At Steve's requests I will keep it
clean and just say you have a lot to learn.

First, I created this thread with the purpose of sharing a humorous video...nothing more, nothing less. It was NOT to turn this thread into a political "hatchet session". I posted it in different forums. interestingly enough, only those who are die-hard Trump supporters appear to have taken it as an "attack" on them, and are either unwilling, or incapable, of accepting the humor presented by the video. Everyone else...INCLUDING Republicans (who are not die-hard Trump supporters)...has taken it in the humorous manner that it was intended.

This raises an interesting question, as to why die-hard Trump supporters take it as an attack against them??? Of course, it is also possible that neither you, nor other Trump, have even bothered to watch the video. Now, I'm not saying you didn't actually watch it...only that it IS a possibility.

Second, you are more than welcome to taking a dislike to what I've said. As a trump supporter, I wouldn't expect any less from you. That is your option/opinion, just as mine is mine...we are both equally entitled to our opinions, and our rights to express opinions...as the law guarantees...a law that is written into The Constitution.

Finally, as for you being 72 years old, that doesn't make your option anymore meaningful, accurate, or factual. I might be a few years younger than you, but your "you have a lot to learn" comment is not only an assumption, but also a fallacy. You have done nothing more than pull this 'belief' out of who-knows-where, and have nothing to back it up...something a certain other person does on a daily basis.

This final point is not directed specifically at you, but at everyone who uses their age as a "defense" against those who are younger. I have come across 10 year-olds who have more intelligence than some 72 year-olds, and who could teach a number of 72 year-olds plenty. Age plays absolutely NO part in one's level of intelligence - just because one is older does NOT make them any smarter, more intelligent, more capable, more intellectual, etc, then anyone who happens to be younger than them.

This is not a political, or politicized, statement...it is A FACT. I could also provide info to a couple of other FACT...ones pertaining to a couple of studies, related to people who attempt to use their age as a 'defining factor' in order to (falsely) "backup" other things there said...but, in an attempt to keep this 'nice', I'll refrain from saying more, or providing links to those studies (as I'm fairly certain even the results of these studies would be "attacked").


~ More peace, love, laughter, & kindness would make the world a MUCH better place

[Panchothedog]

I have seen more presidents than you have. That is the only point I was
trying to make by stating my age. From the way you write it seems like
you are a very bright person, which makes me wonder why you can't see
the good in what I feel is the best president this country has had in my
lifetime. Not trying to pick a fight and I realize that there is no right or wrong in politics only opposing views. I just felt that the first few post in this thread were quite insulting of our president and was quite surprised to find it here on our model boat forum, a place I come to for enjoyment and knowledge. I don't have to go far in this world to find all the opinions like
yours that I can stomach.

[Doug Smock]

First, I created this thread with the purpose of sharing a humorous video...nothing more, nothing less.

And you were ok up until here..

shows exactly how ignorant Trump supporters truly are.

You live in a state where it is acceptable to $hit on the sidewalk. 134,000 homeless, state sponsored drug abuse.. Trump is the least of your worries...

[Panther6834]

You live in a state where it is acceptable to $hit on the sidewalk. 134,000 homeless, state sponsored drug abuse.

No, #2 (or even #1) on the sidewalk is NOT "acceptable" in CA - get caught, get arrested. As far as the homeless is concerned, if you look at the overall population, and compare it against the number of homeless, CA is NOT the state with the highest percentage of homeless. Washington DC has almost 3x what CA has. NY & HI are also considerably higher than CA.

As for your (false) claim of "state sponsored drug abuse", that sounds exactly like something Trump would say. First, legalizing marijuana (which I am NOT in agreement with) is NOT "state sponsored drug abuse". Second, quite a few states have legalized that (44 out of 50, plus D.C.) Third, CA was NOT the first state to do this...that would be Vermont.

Just like a certain other person, you should learn to get your facts straight before you spout off nonsense BS.


~ More peace, love, laughter, & kindness would make the world a MUCH better place

[meangenesracing]

First, I created this thread with the purpose of sharing a humorous video...nothing more, nothing less. It was NOT to turn this thread into a political "hatchet session". I posted it in different forums. interestingly enough, only those who are die-hard Trump supporters appear to have taken it as an "attack" on them, and are either unwilling, or incapable, of accepting the humor presented by the video. Everyone else...INCLUDING Republicans (who are not die-hard Trump supporters)...has taken it in the humorous manner that it was intended.

This raises an interesting question, as to why die-hard Trump supporters take it as an attack against them??? Of course, it is also possible that neither you, nor other Trump, have even bothered to watch the video. Now, I'm not saying you didn't actually watch it...only that it IS a possibility.

Second, you are more than welcome to taking a dislike to what I've said. As a trump supporter, I wouldn't expect any less from you. That is your option/opinion, just as mine is mine...we are both equally entitled to our opinions, and our rights to express opinions...as the law guarantees...a law that is written into The Constitution.

Finally, as for you being 72 years old, that doesn't make your option anymore meaningful, accurate, or factual. I might be a few years younger than you, but your "you have a lot to learn" comment is not only an assumption, but also a fallacy. You have done nothing more than pull this 'belief' out of who-knows-where, and have nothing to back it up...something a certain other person does on a daily basis.

This final point is not directed specifically at you, but at everyone who uses their age as a "defense" against those who are younger. I have come across 10 year-olds who have more intelligence than some 72 year-olds, and who could teach a number of 72 year-olds plenty. Age plays absolutely NO part in one's level of intelligence - just because one is older does NOT make them any smarter, more intelligent, more capable, more intellectual, etc, then anyone who happens to be younger than them.

This is not a political, or politicized, statement...it is A FACT. I could also provide info to a couple of other FACT...ones pertaining to a couple of studies, related to people who attempt to use their age as a 'defining factor' in order to (falsely) "backup" other things there said...but, in an attempt to keep this 'nice', I'll refrain from saying more, or providing links to those studies (as I'm fairly certain even the results of these studies would be "attacked").


~ More peace, love, laughter, & kindness would make the world a MUCH better place

Please, let's be honest you created this post to take a jab at Trump. Whice is fine on some other forums So tired of peoples opinions on Trump. If I want to hear this I'll just turn on the news. Please take this somewhere else, thanks