Mic, I like the way you think. So often things stay the way they are because some do not want to change, or the experience (unpleasant?) of past changes is to be avoided if at all possible. You are absolutely correct in the continued evolving of FE technology, and it is I think a wise thing to be looking ahead as to how the changes can be dealt with. I am sure that there are a number of differing thoughts, ideas and opinions out there, just as there are experienced racers who really do know their stuff. I think this could be a really interesting discussion, especially if the aim is to keep some affordability in racing.
Looking at classes, as far as oval racing goes, is the experience there that P, Q and T are the most popular for racing?
N is pretty much a waste of time due to the cost of getting any real performance out of it, you may as well run P.
S is sort of an inbetween Q and T, sorta like you could go either way otherwise.
Just the way I see it. There is no issue having these classes on the books for records though. Is it better to focus on classes that are well established and supported for events? With the different hull types it can still make for quite a lot of racing, and fast exciting racing at that without needing massive budgets.
My first thoughts.
NZMPBA 2013, 2016 Open Electric Champion. NZMPBA 2016 P Offshore Champion.
2016 SUHA Q Sport Hydro Hi Points Champion.
BOPMPBC Open Mono, Open Electric Champion.
Bookmarks