Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: conformal coating receiver

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    42

    Default conformal coating receiver

    Is there a reason not to conformal coat a receiver? I have searched the forums and most of the discussions are about epoxying the receiver. Does conformal caoting cause a weaker signal or...... Let me hear your thoughts.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Br
    Posts
    2,406

    Default

    I use conformal coating on my receivers with no problems

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    3,031

    Default

    there are plenty of reason NOT to conformal coat your receivers...
    :::::::::::::::. It's NEVER fast enough! .:::::::::::::::

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Br
    Posts
    2,406

    Default

    Ok Jan , what might they be?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ql
    Posts
    393

    Default

    I know that alot of the guys running the larger gas trucks like to run them through water. To protect thier recievers they simply take the cover off and inject a crap load of silicone into it ensuring that the circuit board is completely covered, then then they just put the plastic cover back on the reciever. I cant really see any downside to doing this.
    Come to the FASST side

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,010

    Cool

    Unfortunately, the acetic acid given off by many silicone glues is highly corrosive. This can wreak havoc with bare copper circuit boards and component leads and is not recommended.

    Traditional conformal coatings can void a manufacturer's warranty. I use CorrosionX and water-soaked receivers are not a problem. But then I haven't sent one back for repair either.






    .

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On
    Posts
    7,279

    Default

    I have used 30 minute epoxy as well as hot glue.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    5,190

    Default

    I also use Corrosion X. Some say it is old technology, but it has worked for me.

    Douggie

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Fr
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    as a conformal coating expert that I was (here), I must say that if you use the appropriate material that does not attack any components (some do not resist to the thinner) there are only few reasons why not coating receivers, like material going in areas by capilarity, for our application in FE boat, we may want to use polyurethane material, that's what I'm doing with Humiseal 1A33, it is the best compared to other type, I had a customer few years ago who did a test on submerged pcb's, only the one coated with polyurethane was still functionnal under water!!! Also in the automotive industry, only PU are used for their excellent properties! It seems some new generation of materials like Parylene or water based are even better.
    Emmanuel
    I'm french but I doubt I really am!
    http://pagesperso-orange.fr/pleindetrucs/

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ql
    Posts
    393

    Default

    I like Doby's idea of using 30 minute epoxy
    Come to the FASST side

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    3,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andym View Post
    Ok Jan , what might they be?
    it came out wrong... what I meant to say is there are plenty of reason to do so...
    sometimes things in my head don't come out right
    sorry
    :::::::::::::::. It's NEVER fast enough! .:::::::::::::::

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •