Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 75

Thread: How to tune stepped mono for racing?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default

    Here is my latest test with Joseph's syncron.
    https://youtu.be/KlMfhS_b8dw
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default

    Does anybody know of someone who has gotten the H&M chief tuned well?
    I'm oh so curious. I tried a big turn fin and she banked OUTWARD!!
    How dat work?
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default

    Hey Erik, do you know of any more recent setups, a lot has changed in 5 years.
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jesse J View Post
    I tried a big turn fin and she banked OUTWARD!!
    How dat work?
    Your turn fin is still canted over too much and as it is slipping sideways the angle on the fin is forcing the that side upwards, so the bigger the fin the higher that side will ride, and you need to stand it more upright to remedy it. I felt sure I mentioned that as a possible issue earlier, but now reviewing the thread I can't see it, maybe I posted in a different thread, but whatever, the effect of the bigger fin confirms that it is at the wrong angle, and extra lift at the rear during turns would also explain the hooking , so you may cure both issues with a single easy fix.

    The setups Erik posted are still valid, Mark Shipman is still running both of those boats and still competitive with them, he is the clubmate I spoke of earlier that switched from Lehner to Neu, although back when those were posted he was still running the popular Leopards I mentioned.
    Dee is ETTI's team and test driver so he always has either the latest hull or a secret project and isn't driving those any more, but as I mentioned before the differences between hulls is shrinking as they are converging around the ideal for the course. We only have about 10% more power than we had in those setups, and while there are newer and better all round boats, they are still absolute beasts in calm water conditions, and the setups for the new ones which have a few more degrees of deadrise and a lot more hydro nose lift that is out of the water 95% of the time will be very similar indeed.

    Leopard 3674 1700 are a popular motor for 6s Mono2
    Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    There was a race last week and I took some pictures of the rear end of well set up monos for you, I was horrified to find out that when I was taking the photos peope were thinking i was working on a mono myself, so I didn't get out a tape measure and angle gauge.




    Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    2,729

    Default





    Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    2,729

    Default





    Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default

    Sweet, thanks Paul! Ok, you've convinced me... I'll go vertical.
    Yes you did tell me, I just haven't had the time to redo the turn fin.
    Gonna make in as deep as the keel and 2" wide, sound like a good start?

    Thanks again for the recon pics, and for going under cover as a mono guy.
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default

    Question: has anybody run the Skyper mono1, or speedman mono II by hydro and marine?

    The skyper call it an open flood chamber? Is this accomplished by weights to port side?

    Any comments on setup and performance of either/both?

    Skyper: https://hydromarine.de/images/produc...ages/958_5.JPG
    Speedman: https://hydromarine.de/images/produc.../Speedm_85.jpg
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    RO
    Posts
    745

    Default

    Hi Jesse,
    I had both in my hands: the Skyper was mine and I raced it for about two years, the Speedman I installed for a friend. The open channel in the Skyper is a pain in... you either partially close it, add weights or install a small internal chamber they usually provide. As performance, it was very good, but not something impressive, due to the fact that it was a bit on the heavy side. It was actually replaced by the King Cobra, which is the same hull with a different (normal) top.
    The Speedman was a joy to build, excellent quality and it ran perfectly from the first test. Two years ago, at the Naviga world championship, there were still a couple around doing well.
    In brief: good hulls, but they are almost obsolete... As options, consider newer ones, like the Etti Sirius for mono 1 and the Rasch Tomcat or QEssenz for Mono2 (I am in love with this one).
    http://raschmodellbau.eu/Boote/Q-Essenz-Mono2
    http://raschmodellbau.eu/Boote/Tomcat-M2-Mono2
    Cornel

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default

    Hi Cornel, thanks for your input; how does one order one of these from the US?
    Both are beauties, but I'd prefer the tomcat.
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  12. #42
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    RO
    Posts
    745

    Default

    I think you can contact him on the website, he usually answers within a day or two.
    You can also ask him to install the floodchamber and ask for a race spec (lighter but a bit more expensive).
    Cornel

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default

    So, now a question: what is fun sport class? This chief is proving a significant challenge.
    What voltage/motor/prop are guys running this on?
    Thanks
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    Hydros.
    Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default

    What??? That is the class H&M advertises this chief boat as... bah!
    I'm getting the idea that nobody races this hull...
    Last edited by Jesse J; 07-15-2017 at 09:11 PM.
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  16. #46
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    I didn't really understand that you meant by "what is fun sport class?" and tried indicating that Hydros are more fun classes to me. I was just joking though, stick with it and I am sure you will get there in the end. Where are you at now?

    I am now understanding that you think "fun sport" is the name of a race class? If so you are mistaken, all the surface drive mono classes have Mono in the name, there is Mini Mono for <450mm hulls with <110g 2-3s battery, Mono1 with <280g 2-3s battery 6min, Mono2 with <560g 4-6s battery 6min, and their used to be Mono3 with 20 SubCs 6min (but it was killed off when LiPo came in). There are also submerged drive mono classes Eco <280g 2-3s 6min, Mini Eco <110g 2-3s 6min, FSR-E <840g 15min, F1-E speed, and F3-E steering.

    While H&M make some great race boats aimed at the Naviga classes they only constitute about 1/3rd of H&Ms hulls. Most are semi scale boats for fun running, sport running, powerboating or whatever you want to call it, running either solo or in a club but maybe without even having buoys out to make a course, and not against a clock. I think they put funsport in the competition class category to indicate that it isn't made to fit a class.

    I have never seen a Chief racing and nor do I expect to, it is a good looking fast scale boat, but it is very big for a Mono 2, maybe small Mono 3 size if it was still going, it has a very high deadrise, and has rather a lot of freeboard, all of which could make it a good very rough water boat, but count against it in typical conditions. However the rear overhang is just dead weight, the engine bulges would slow down self-righting considerably, and the 3 steps are too short to be of much use at model size.
    Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

  17. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default

    Dang, me so foolish! Now that you spell it out, all makes sense. I did buy it for its looks... recon I'll keep at it and not try to race it competitively.

    Had it out last time, but just as it hit full throttle, me stub broke loose from the wire, so still don't know how vertical turn fin works. Should have another go this next Saturday.
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  18. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default

    I am in contact with randolf and am about to order me a tomcat m2 with flood chamber.
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  19. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default Removing lift strakes

    Last weekend I think I got the mix closest so far. Hacker 8xl, 4s, m645 prop, strut 1/2" up from keel and down 3-4 degrees. But, was still chine walking severely as every time I've taken her out. I think this is what is causing the problems in the turns and instability in the straight line.

    So, I Got me a "lift strake sander" and went to town on the chief.

    This Pneumatic sander was just made for this project!
    My little 1.5 gal air tank made the process take 4 times as long as it should have.
    About an hour of sand until pressure drops and sander stops (5 sec) wait for pressure to build back up (20 sec) then repeat. I'm glad I wore my respirator, ear plugs and safety glasses... that fiber glass is nasty!
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Jesse J; 08-09-2017 at 07:59 AM.
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  20. #50
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    6,191

    Default

    Late to the thread but thought I'd share, If you;ve already figured all this out I apologize.

    Stepped monos are defined by both organizations as hydroplanes. NAMBA has an electric offshore class in which steps are allowed. IMPBA has no electric offshore classes at all. We run them. They're just not in the book. Major difference being that most IMPBA venue run offshore as a sprint instead of a timed heat with most laps winning. I've not seen the Chief up close but the website claims 880mm or 34-5/8" Makes it Q.

    Great pics Paul. Something I noticed that's different on most of those than what we typically see on step-less mono. Big turn fins and they are square to the water instead of square to the bottom. Interesting...... Maybe this is why I've seen one turn well. It also looks like the prop is very far behind the trailing edge. Farther than the typical stinger strut we tend to use on mono hulls.
    Noisy person

  21. #51
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    OK
    Posts
    1,464

    Default

    It's been my experience that prop behind the rudder induces understeer. Maybe that keeps them from spinning out?

  22. #52
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    The Fins are almost vertical but you can see in some of the pics that there is a degree or two of hook angle. I don't really know how your boats work with the fins hooked the wrong way at the entry and exit of the turn, do you run a much deeper rudder? The fins are indeed bigger in proportion which is I think due to our course dimensions, the Naviga oval is 60m (66yd) straights with a 5m (5.5yd) radius on each end for a total length of about 1/12 mile, I know your oval is 1/6mile and straights are much longer, but from the videos I have seen your turn radius looks much bigger too (what is your radius?).

    Another difference is that you won't see a trim tab on a Naviga Mono, but you guys seem to fit them right off the bat, before you have even run the setup to see if it has any naughty handling defects that need them fitting to rectify.

    I hadn't noticed the "stinger" length difference, maybe that extra leverage helps to explain why we need lower lift props (as well as the straighter shafts), and why we run higher KV than you despite using a lot less power (to use much smaller props that walk less). I am however not mono knowledgable enough to say why the longer shaft. As they are prop riding it is effectively extra boat length that is almost free of weight and drag penalty, but I suspect that there is more to it than that.
    Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

  23. #53
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    Some are prop behind rudder some are side by side and some are in front, all have close to vertical fins.

    If you are getting understeer you can fix it by: moving the rudder back giving it more leverage, increasing the size of the rudder or reducing the size of the turn fin, which you should do depends on what course conditions you want to run in, other handling traits the boat has, and how hard it can turn compared to the radius of your course. As far as I know, moving the prop forwards won't help (if you maintain the same CoG).
    Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

  24. #54
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    6,191

    Default

    Paul, course size depends on the venue. It can vary. There is some fudge room on the dimensions as long as each lap is 1/6th mile but for many courses I've setup the radius was 35ft. Our home pond is 35'. Pretty sure the idea was to allow ponds that were short and fat or long and narrow to still place a legal course.

    The turn fins on our mono aren't in the water typically when going straight. At least mine don't. It they do it's just the very tip. The only time they really touch is when we turn. So we place them perpendicular to the running surface while turning. Looking at the naviga setups it appears you use the fin to help keep the boat traveling straight. Is that accurate?

    On the tabs. Speculation on my part here too. Your boats are riding thrust where as we are using the bottom more. If your stepped boats do weird things you wont know since they run like hydro planes with multiple wetted surfaces. If you capsize, you wait, self-right, and continue. If we capsize we're done. So we tend to run a wetter setup. Hence, using the bottom of the boat more. I like to setup my mono so that they fly flat if they come out of the water and then use the tabs to decide how much I let them fly. 30% plus CG from the transome. What do you guys shoot for with CG on the steps?

    Truth, I've not spent much time with stepped mono. They seem such different animals with the steps. I was watching this thread. That Chief is such a beautiful boat. I was hoping someone would figure it out.
    Noisy person

  25. #55
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default

    Thanks for all the great input, yes she is a looker. I'm really optimistic about delifting her and bringing her more like our wetter monos. Having three steps, each lower toward the transom, she is kinda hybrid; stuck between the big euro steps and our nonsteps. Hope to get her out this weekend for a test. I have also gone another inch on rudder since she never has hooked up in the corners yet. As Paul has recommended, I have a vertical square turn fin and have added another reinforcement and sturdied up the bracket.
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  26. #56
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Cool New to the fleet

    H&m skyper 1 Kevlar carbon ❤️
    Ordered June 1... got it today from rocket city in Orlando- Brian be safe brother!

    26.5" x 7.5" at transom
    4" chamber behind and 3" in front of step.

    Odd lil guy. Gonna set him up for mono 1, then race in N2 offshore with HOTMBC crew. Here are some shots of our chihuahua with a boat for scale.

    I'll be referring to earlier posts on this...

    Not giving up on chief, just with all the bull Harvey, I can't feel too good about playing until I help out some flooded folks.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Jesse J; 09-08-2017 at 08:14 PM.
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  27. #57
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    I would be putting on waders and running in the main street.
    Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

  28. #58
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default Skyper mono 1 almost ready for test

    Got her set up with some euro help...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  29. #59
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    7,080

    Default

    Help me figure out elegant turn fin bracket...
    Please?
    Attached Images Attached Images
    "Look good doin' it"
    See the fleet

  30. #60
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    On riggers and monos without much transom depth we generally cut a vertical slot on the transom, and glue in a piece of carbon instead of using a bracket.

    Not a mono, and not a turn fin, but you can get the idea from the start of this video.
    Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •