Sailr,
It is obvious that I am aware of this error. Thank you for re-stating the obvious. I moved this thread from the "main" board (where I can mod threads) to the "RTR" board (where I cannot). My mouse must have jumped when I selected the UL-1 thread. Once it left the "main" board, I can no longer touch it. I notified Steven via PM. When he logs in next, it will be corrected. Hence the post...
It's a minor inconvenience that I am truly sorry for.
"A quick temper will make a fool of you soon enough."
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Bruce Lee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
What ever happened to Russ Williamson @ Aquacraft? When problems started rising about the UL-1 he has been VERY quite much like Aquacraft has been. Aquacrafts lawyers probably told them to shut up.
Doby, was anything said about steps being taken to correct the problems with QC, and improved hulls?
Mine came with this hole in it plus the leaky water jacket.
Steven,
You are right. Inquiring minds want to know I would think AQ wouldn't want to continue having the same quality deficiencies but it takes time to set up the corrections to be done on the other side of the world. The main problem might be that they already have an enormous number of the poor quality hulls and don't want to scrap 'em until they've sold them all. As a manufacturer, I would eat those hulls in the interest of good customer relations. They risk irreparably hurting their reputation if they continue to sell the ones they have now.
Bookmarks