Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Got some New abc props of interest in today

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default Got some New abc props of interest in today

    Got a couple new release props in today. One very popular prop is the 1815, well and 1814 has been released with the same rake and blade area. Good for the setups with not quite enough power to turn the 1815. Then I got an 1814 three blade. 15 degree rake with a tad more blade area. I don't even know of a 45mm three blade so this one may fill a gap. It looks like it means business.





    32" carbon rivercat single 4s 102mph, 27” mini Rivercat 92mph, kbb34 91mph, jessej micro cat(too fast) was

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    9,488

    Default

    Looking forward to the results of the 3 blade Travis
    .NAMBA20...Caterpillar UL-1, P-Spec OM29, P-Mono DF33, P-Spec JAE, Aussie 33" Hydro-LSH, Sprintcat CC2028 on 8s, PT SS45 Q Hydro, PS295 UL-1 power, OSE Brothers Outlaw QMono 4-sale, Rio 51z CC2028 on 8s

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    7,630

    Default

    PropShop has a 4514/3. I run it on the Pursuit, runs real well but now I may have something new to try.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,119

    Default

    if a 1815 is 2 big the,,,, 1814/3 will be just as big because of it's 3rd blade the 3 blade props do have the advantages,, but your amps and load will go up ! best to reduce the 1815 and make that work then go to a 3 blade ! I do happen to like 3 blades better on a mono,, Keith does runs them with much success on his cats !
    Last edited by dasboata; 11-07-2015 at 08:41 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dasboata View Post
    if a 1815 is 2 big the,,,, 1814/3 will be just as big because of it's 3rd blade the 3 blade props do have the advantages,, but your amps and load will go up ! best to reduce the 1815 and make that work then go to a 3 blade ! I do happen to like 3 blades better on a mono,, Keith does runs them with much success on his cats !

    I'm not quite sure what you mean by your post but it seems to me like your saying that I was implying that the three blade 1814 will be less? You may want to read the first post again. There is a TWO blade 1814 in the pic and what I was referring to.
    32" carbon rivercat single 4s 102mph, 27” mini Rivercat 92mph, kbb34 91mph, jessej micro cat(too fast) was

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,262

    Default

    dasboata: Any particular differences between 2 and 3 blade props? Especially on a cat...
    Last edited by dmitry100; 11-07-2015 at 11:18 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    9,488

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by dasboata View Post
    if a 1815 is 2 big the,,,, 1814/3 will be just as big because of it's 3rd blade the 3 blade props do have the advantages,, but your amps and load will go up ! best to reduce the 1815 and make that work then go to a 3 blade ! I do happen to like 3 blades better on a mono,, Keith does runs them with much success on his cats !
    I try an run only 3 blade props on my Monos because they cause mine to handle so well
    love to find a 1515/3 blade
    need to try different ones on my Lucas Oil P Limited Cat next
    .NAMBA20...Caterpillar UL-1, P-Spec OM29, P-Mono DF33, P-Spec JAE, Aussie 33" Hydro-LSH, Sprintcat CC2028 on 8s, PT SS45 Q Hydro, PS295 UL-1 power, OSE Brothers Outlaw QMono 4-sale, Rio 51z CC2028 on 8s

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brushless55 View Post
    I try an run only 3 blade props on my Monos because they cause mine to handle so well
    love to find a 1515/3 blade
    need to try different ones on my Lucas Oil P Limited Cat next
    There is 1516-10-50(3)and a 1514-10-75(3) and a 1614-10-50(3)
    32" carbon rivercat single 4s 102mph, 27” mini Rivercat 92mph, kbb34 91mph, jessej micro cat(too fast) was

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kfxguy View Post
    I'm not quite sure what you mean by your post but it seems to me like your saying that I was implying that the three blade 1814 will be less? You may want to read the first post again. There is a TWO blade 1814 in the pic and what I was referring to.
    Yes thats what I thought you were saying I did not realize the 2 blade was a 1814 ? my mistake Travis

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dmitry100 View Post
    dasboata: Any particular differences between 2 and 3 blade props? Especially on a cat...
    only the obvious,,, my personal preference is 2 blades on cats and 3 blades on monos but you can use them both on both !!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brushless55 View Post
    I try an run only 3 blade props on my Monos because they cause mine to handle so well
    love to find a 1515/3 blade
    need to try different ones on my Lucas Oil P Limited Cat next
    I have 1614/3 and 1514/3 I can mod up ?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    9,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kfxguy View Post
    There is 1516-10-50(3)and a 1514-10-75(3) and a 1614-10-50(3)
    Quote Originally Posted by dasboata View Post
    I have 1614/3 and 1514/3 I can mod up ?
    Ok, educate me a little on these new 14 props
    what do I loose or gain from the 1615 and 1715 props I have now ?

    thanks
    .NAMBA20...Caterpillar UL-1, P-Spec OM29, P-Mono DF33, P-Spec JAE, Aussie 33" Hydro-LSH, Sprintcat CC2028 on 8s, PT SS45 Q Hydro, PS295 UL-1 power, OSE Brothers Outlaw QMono 4-sale, Rio 51z CC2028 on 8s

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,119

    Default

    Please PM me This is not my thread !! I can make the 1614 run just as good as the 1515 I was just offering you a alternative !
    Last edited by dasboata; 11-08-2015 at 08:44 AM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dasboata View Post
    Please PM me This is not my thread !! I can make the 1614 run just as good as the 1515 I was just offering you a alternative !

    This is a public forum. We are all here to help each other (well at least some of us are) so I'm worried about being selfish with a thread I created. As long as my fellow members are being helped, that all I'm worried about.
    32" carbon rivercat single 4s 102mph, 27” mini Rivercat 92mph, kbb34 91mph, jessej micro cat(too fast) was

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    9,488

    Default

    Agreed as you are both very helpful on this subject
    I was wondering the difference between the 14 and 15 props
    1614 vs 1615 example
    .NAMBA20...Caterpillar UL-1, P-Spec OM29, P-Mono DF33, P-Spec JAE, Aussie 33" Hydro-LSH, Sprintcat CC2028 on 8s, PT SS45 Q Hydro, PS295 UL-1 power, OSE Brothers Outlaw QMono 4-sale, Rio 51z CC2028 on 8s

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    1614 has 1.4 pitch ratio. 1615 has 1.5 pitch ratio. Now. If one is a 15 degree take and the other is a 17 degree rake, well that changes it a little more as far as lift goes.
    32" carbon rivercat single 4s 102mph, 27” mini Rivercat 92mph, kbb34 91mph, jessej micro cat(too fast) was

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,262

    Default

    The more rake the more lift, right...

    Brushless: (scroll down to text) https://forums.offshoreelectrics.com/...chmentid=88524

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    7,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dmitry100 View Post
    The more rake the more lift, right...

    Brushless: (scroll down to text) https://forums.offshoreelectrics.com/...chmentid=88524
    I think the more rake the more the prop 'bites' into the water causing the transom to hunker down or the bow to get light.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,262

    Default

    Yep :) http://www.mercuryracing.com/prop-sc...-3-blade-rake/

    srislash: How do you normally know how much prop to cut down/reduce? I'm testing higher RPM on my tp's with some not so great results so I was thinking to cut down a pair of CNC 448's (to 444 and then to 442)

    People keep talking about their "rated efficiency"... what does that pertain to? they're not really efficient at high rpm though right...
    Last edited by dmitry100; 11-09-2015 at 12:29 AM.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    9,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kfxguy View Post
    1614 has 1.4 pitch ratio. 1615 has 1.5 pitch ratio. Now. If one is a 15 degree take and the other is a 17 degree rake, well that changes it a little more as far as lift goes.
    So these 14 props have the same rake as the 15 ?
    I like the way my 15 props run on my monos
    reason for the question
    .NAMBA20...Caterpillar UL-1, P-Spec OM29, P-Mono DF33, P-Spec JAE, Aussie 33" Hydro-LSH, Sprintcat CC2028 on 8s, PT SS45 Q Hydro, PS295 UL-1 power, OSE Brothers Outlaw QMono 4-sale, Rio 51z CC2028 on 8s

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brushless55 View Post
    So these 14 props have the same rake as the 15 ?
    I like the way my 15 props run on my monos
    reason for the question
    Yes. But you have to be careful. There is a 1914-10-50 and it's not the same as a 1914-17-45. You must pay attention to all the numbers. There's not many 14 pitch series out just yet. I just checked the ose store and so far I didn't see any of the new stuff yet. I think he's supposed to be getting a shipment very soon with some new numbers. The 48mm 3 blade that is comparable to a 447/3 isn't done yet either. I've got one coming to me as soon as it is. Along with a couple other things.
    32" carbon rivercat single 4s 102mph, 27” mini Rivercat 92mph, kbb34 91mph, jessej micro cat(too fast) was

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,262

    Default

    kfxguy: Any reason to go with a higher BAR prop like .6 versus a .45 ?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dmitry100 View Post
    kfxguy: Any reason to go with a higher BAR prop like .6 versus a .45 ?
    Well the theory is it has more tongue and they should bite better off the start, but I haven't experienced any difference except overall they are slower. That's just a general statement without going in depth. I did have a 1914-10-50 do quite well on my mono however. I guess it all depends on the hull. I know an 1815 and 1915 bite well on take off with a car but they slip pretty bad on a mono. The further back the prop is away from the transom on a mono it does help. I'm expecting the three blades to help that though. I need to get some time to work these props and get to testing. Right now I'm in build mode and haven't run anything for a few weeks. I will let you know what I find, I did get a few others I didn't post about.
    32" carbon rivercat single 4s 102mph, 27” mini Rivercat 92mph, kbb34 91mph, jessej micro cat(too fast) was

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •