Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 271 to 292 of 292

Thread: NAMBA P-Ltd Motor discussion

  1. #271
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    842

    Default

    rayzerdesigns
    from the NAMBA Nats thread
    lots of people including myself were burning up motors and speedos..and connectors
    Little birdie also told me this was happening at other larger electric venues.

    What gives? Through all this discussion we were told the motor problem was fixed and or we needed to learn how to run spec boats. Can the spec experts please share your knowledge again.

    Doug
    Doug Peterson
    IMPBA 19993
    www.badgerboaters.com

  2. #272
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DPeterson View Post
    rayzerdesigns
    from the NAMBA Nats thread


    Little birdie also told me this was happening at other larger electric venues.

    What gives? Through all this discussion we were told the motor problem was fixed and or we needed to learn how to run spec boats. Can the spec experts please share your knowledge again.

    Doug
    Doug,

    Is it possible for you to NOT be a total prick??

    Just wondering...

    Since you seam to have forgotten... it's pretty simple... You have to tune your setup for the water conditions... Ask about the water conditions, and you'll figure it out.
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  3. #273
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darin Jordan View Post
    Doug,

    Is it possible for you to NOT be a total prick??

    Just wondering...

    Since you seam to have forgotten... it's pretty simple... You have to tune your setup for the water conditions... Ask about the water conditions, and you'll figure it out.
    And, since you seem to have all the answers... why don't you stop bitching and poking about this and just write a freaking proposal to get your motors included. If you really believe in this enough to put down the rest of us, step up and stop being an observer. Put YOURSELF in the line of fire and do something, if you feel it necessary!
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  4. #274
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    842

    Default

    Just a direct question. Not sure name calling is in order.

    Water conditions? Really? Are you sure? I would never had figured that out.

    Was thinking I had maybe made a mistake by going a different direction because the motor burning issue was so quite. Nope - no mistake.
    Doug Peterson
    IMPBA 19993
    www.badgerboaters.com

  5. #275
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DPeterson View Post
    Just a direct question. Not sure name calling is in order.

    Water conditions? Really? Are you sure? I would never had figured that out.

    Was thinking I had maybe made a mistake by going a different direction because the motor burning issue was so quite. Nope - no mistake.
    Doug... I'm not sure which birdies you are listening to, but the ones I talked to are used to running in 50-60-degree, very clear water, running 2030KV motors with bent up 447 props right on the ragged edge. They burn motors here...

    When you take that setup to 80+ degree water, that is blooming and sticky, well... heat...


    But you obviously know that...

    Wanna place any bets on whether or not your selected motors would gain more heat/loading at that same pond?? Clearly...


    And, for the record, I'm NOT against adding new motors, even the ones you've selected, perhaps, to the approved list. The class is going to need some additions.

    But stop bitching about it and trying to belittle those of us who have been involved, or who race the class as is, and get off the fence and get it done. Your personal attacks are pointless...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  6. #276
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    842

    Default

    Geez Darin, calm down. I didn't steel your wife!

    So - did the motors get fixed or not? Is it still the waters fault? Is it still our fault? Simple questions.

    Been running on 80 degree water all year. Hard for me to understand blameing the water.
    Doug Peterson
    IMPBA 19993
    www.badgerboaters.com

  7. #277
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DPeterson View Post
    So - did the motors get fixed or not? Is it still the waters fault? Is it still our fault? Simple questions.

    Been running on 80 degree water all year. Hard for me to blame the water.

    You'll have to ask Aquacraft... That's all anyone runs anymore...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  8. #278
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    6,192

    Default

    Doug wouldn't have seen it as I'm on his ignore list but just about a week ago I posted this on another thread:

    Sadly there really will come a point that "limited" will be replaced by something else. Today, tomorrow, next season? I don't have a clue. Proboat doesn't give a rip about limited racing and Aquacraft doesn't have anyone in house that even knows what that is anymore. That's my impression by the way. It's not company line from either Proboat or AQ.

    It's going to take some careful consideration and pretty good timing to get that next phase right. The problem will be the same too. Commit to a any one motor or even a handful of them and we're at their mercy. If they decide that they can save a few bucks on shellac or ABEC1 bearings we get what we get. The motors change. We (racers) don't and never will be able to dictate manufacturers specifications. Racers make up such an itty bitty percentage of the market that we have little influence. Decisions are made based on math and not on racer desires.

    We've seen this from multiple manufacturers that we were committed too thus far. They all make changes.

    Back in the 700 brushed motor days, Mabuchi produced a batch of special motors for a vendor that bought a bunch of them. That motor suddenly was the only motor to have. Your existing stuff was obsolete. Screwed up the works.

    Some AQ changes were so subtle that they only showed up if you were already close to the edge.

    Proboat actually changed motor suppliers. Dumped their whole line of motors. Those were the best spec motors yet. They didn't check with us. haha Why would they though? We (racers again) don't buy enough product to influence their bottom line.

    IMPBA D4 might be on the right path but it's going to take a larger sampling (guessing here) to sell everyone on the idea. It would be stellar if we could get NAMBA and IMPBA to buy a pallet each of the 3630 1950 kv that D4 runs. Or something like it. Then sell them to members only for the next 5 years or so.

    I so wish I had a crystal ball to predict where these manufacturers were going


    We have seen guys running in the high 130's on our pond without failure.......yet! The motors are better than they were when we were having a slew of failures.

    I feel your pain Darin. Shot over the bow but never any effort to fix anything.

    Limited's days, at least as way we know it, are numbered. When/if AQ dumps it's motors we're collectively hosed.

    I'm not saying the answer is motor X,Y,Z (Neu, Hacker, TP, whatever) but an answer has to come. What and when? I haven't a clue.
    Noisy person

  9. #279
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On
    Posts
    7,279

    Default

    Now now boys...they are just toy.....ahhh, never mind...


    By the way, you don't need the 2030 to win in the spec classes, I won both the spec cat and offshore at this years Mich Cup using the 1800 motor.....

    Just saying..

    Just bragging....

  10. #280
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    842

    Default

    Terry - I took you off my ignore list a long time ago. I missed the entertainment.

    Terry
    Shot over the bow but never any effort to fix anything.
    Incorrect statement concerning me at least. Myself, including my race buddies put more effort, time and money into finding a better solution than any others that I know of.

    Anyway Terry, thanks for your reply to my inquiry about the current 2030's.
    Doug Peterson
    IMPBA 19993
    www.badgerboaters.com

  11. #281
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,585

    Default

    Feel the love.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  12. #282
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,585

    Default

    Hey we in ohio don't even have spec classes and we are having a great summer. I only blew up one lehner 3080 this summer. Darn heavy Canadian water.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  13. #283
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    6,192

    Default

    I know I read that you had moved on from organized racing. What gives?

    The problem you're going to run into is that you (D4) don't have enough guys racing the motors to convince the nay sayers. Not "running" them. "Racing" them. Lap after lap after lap of nasty a$$ heat racing with crap water etc. I will vouch for the TP motors quality though. Much better motor than a 2030. It's not close in my opinion quality wise.

    The 2030 is better but still not great. I have one right now that has an intermittent phase. Weirdest thing I've seen. It didn't go thermal nuclear like we're used to seeing. Just dropped a phase as far as I can tell. That one has a zillion laps on it though so could just be lack of maintenance.

    The SSS motors we were toying with were not equal in quality. To get there we had to increased size. Kind defeated the purpose. I was racing a 36mm version in P sport and staying in the same turn as the big boys.
    Noisy person

  14. #284
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    842

    Default

    Terry
    The problem you're going to run into is that you (D4) don't have enough guys racing the motors to convince the nay sayers.
    The very reason I subsidized the sale of close to 100 TP motors all across the Country and into just about every club. For reasons unknown to me the guy's who bought them seem to be afraid to test them and report back. The NAMBA brass must have scared them quite. :)

    As for running in sanctioned events - once you take out the anal rule factor, racing toy boats is a ton of fun.

    Doug
    Doug Peterson
    IMPBA 19993
    www.badgerboaters.com

  15. #285
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    90

    Default

    This year I bought 2 TPs and 2 of the new style UL1s. All the motors have been used for 9 races. One TP is in a Cat, the other TP is in the Mono. The UL1s are in the LSH and Rigger. If I had to pick one, it would definitely be the TP. It's just the better quality motor. The motors never got over 100 degrees; running the same prop I had with the UL1, the TP might pull a little harder on the top end. The LSH (Whiplash) I did prop down to an H5, only because I wanted to go a whole race season without burning up a UL1. My club voted the TP motor in last November, and only 2 people in the club were using the motors. I wasn't like people were coming over and saying that boat was really fast. If I had a choice, I'd vote the TP motor in right now. We really need to start thinking about what we're going to do with this motor situation. Maybe we need to eliminate the RTR. And, we need to eliminate the word "nominal" from the battery section.

  16. #286
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    wi
    Posts
    232

    Default

    Darin, Doug offered you a free motor to test. When the head ostrich at namba told you all to stick your heads in the sand you listened. Now instead of a season of racing from the larger fe clubs, your own comparison data along with eagle tree and castle data to discuss as a starting point, we have the water was to cold your data is invalid. Nice try to blame Doug for anything.
    I try and avoid paste eaters.

  17. #287
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Wa
    Posts
    5,905

    Default

    i think this one has run it's course
    "Our society strives to avoid any possibility of offending anyone except God.
    Billy Graham

  18. #288
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Wa
    Posts
    5,905

    Default

    If every one will keep it civil and pertaining to the motor subject I will open it back up.

    Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
    "Our society strives to avoid any possibility of offending anyone except God.
    Billy Graham

  19. #289
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
    Darin, Doug offered you a free motor to test. When the head ostrich at namba told you all to stick your heads in the sand you listened. Now instead of a season of racing from the larger fe clubs, your own comparison data along with eagle tree and castle data to discuss as a starting point, we have the water was to cold your data is invalid. Nice try to blame Doug for anything.
    Just to be factual... I contacted Doug in regards to bench testing one of these motors. I've never seen a motor.


    As for the rest of your post, I'm letting it go. It's nonsense and not productive to even address...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  20. #290
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Schweers View Post
    We really need to start thinking about what we're going to do with this motor situation.
    Agreed...

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Schweers View Post
    Maybe we need to eliminate the RTR.
    Perhaps that's run it's course as well. Pro Boat is out of the equation now for motor supply based on the current rules... the 2050 KV is out of the rules for length, and the rest of the line has gone to 40mm motors...

    Not sure about AQ... it's been pretty quiet over there too.

    With the markets the way they are, RC Boat racing is simply TOO small a segment of the Boating portion of the RC Hobby, and a miniscule portion of the overall RC Hobby, to focus directly on. For the past 6 years I've tried to get that focus out of Pro Boat and it was there for awhile, but the marketers have spoken.

    And, let's face it... the IM31 or BJ29 are WAY more fun and a bigger benefit to the RC Boating segment as a whole with a bigger, more capable power system. Good on Rafael for making that happen.

    I think that racing needs to adapt to the market, not the other way around.



    Quote Originally Posted by Greg Schweers View Post
    And, we need to eliminate the word "nominal" from the battery section.
    I'm not sure about this part, but the actual class voltages were just recently changed. "Nominal" values are not used... actual values are...

    You can read the updates here:

    http://www.namba.com/content/library...e%20061415.pdf
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  21. #291
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    On
    Posts
    561

    Default

    Of topic, and the other end of the scale !

    Howard what was the wind on the 3080 you cooked ? I run 3060 in my mono 7T, and cat 3080 5T no issues ! Canadian water all the time.

    Cheers, Jay.

  22. #292
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Wa
    Posts
    5,905

    Default

    closing this one now that the other thread up
    "Our society strives to avoid any possibility of offending anyone except God.
    Billy Graham

Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •