Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 103

Thread: Does Waxing a boat hull increase speed?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    I can see why the suction theory makes more sense with a mono.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,010

    Cool

    ...I have had my best runs with this Cheetah with a mirror bottom finish on the boat and a highly polished leading edge on the prop....
    How much faster was the mirror bottom compared to a sanded bottom? How much faster was the polished prop versus the prop with a satin finish? How long were the GPS runs?



    .
    ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for


  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Like i said. i dont have the math to support it and in this case how would one compare
    polished or ruff anyway on same boat same conditions. But with this cheetah build by KFXGUY we were trying to set a gps record and i have probably 40 runs to offer my opinion. with all due respect I'm not going
    to engage in some EDIT contest on whether a cat runs better polished or not or a prop runs better in this hull polished or not. take it for what it's worth. But until someone posts a GPS run on video of a cheetah running 83 on 7s 86 on 8s, I'm gling with polished hull on FC Cheetah.
    Last edited by Doug Smock; 09-01-2015 at 10:27 PM. Reason: Seriously???

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Fastest Fighter Cat Cheetah PERIOD!
    http://youtu.be/8rpnSrjC_-8

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ga
    Posts
    5,267

    Default

    Ahem...... Say it with me...... At the end of the day we are grown men playing with TOY boats.
    MODEL BOAT RACER
    IMPBA President
    District 13 Director 2011- present
    IMPBA National Records Director 2009-2019
    IMPBA 19887L CD
    NAMBA 1169

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    gotcha my maritime brother

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    ca
    Posts
    6,963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bduncan View Post
    Like i said. i dont have the math to support it and in this case how would one compare
    polished or ruff anyway on same boat same conditions. But with this cheetah build by KFXGUY we were trying to set a gps record and i have probably 40 runs to offer my opinion. with all due respect I'm not going
    to engage in some EDIT contest on whether a cat runs better polished or not or a prop runs better in this hull polished or not. take it for what it's worth. But until someone posts a GPS run on video of a cheetah running 83 on 7s 86 on 8s, I'm gling with polished hull on FC Cheetah.




    NAMBA ( real actual SAW record speeds) :

    P Catamaran [ 4 cell] : 102.882mph * scuffed sponson bottoms
    Q Catamaran [6 cell] : 127.986mph scuffed sponson bottoms
    S Catamaran [8 cell] : 132.042mph scuffed sponson bottoms (your Cat unscuffed on 8 cells: 86mph)
    T Catamaran [10 cells] : 138.086mph * scuffed sponson bottoms
    {I have videos of all these}

    To be fair these speeds were not with Cheetahs. You can certainly claim the "apples to oranges" rule. The record catamarans were narrower and more banana-like. (*Maybe it was the Dinogy batteries)

    Also to be fair my current NAMBA P-Catamaran 2-Lap National Record was with my unscuffed* Cheetah .
    Last edited by properchopper; 09-02-2015 at 12:14 AM.
    2008 NAMBA P-Mono & P-Offshore Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder; '15 P-Cat, P-Ltd Cat 2-Lap
    2009/2010 NAMBA P-Sport Hydro Nat'l 2-Lap Record Holder, '13 SCSTA P-Ltd Cat High Points
    '11 NAMBA [P-Ltd] : Mono, Offshore, OPC, Sport Hydro; '06 LSO, '12,'13,'14 P Ltd Cat /Mono

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    what's your point? my mercedes goes 195

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    I'll bet you 5k you can't get a cheetah to
    run 86.2

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    3,663

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bduncan View Post
    I'll bet you 5k you can't get a cheetah to
    run 86.2
    What a silly statement. Too bad it's an empty promise.
    If you had a way to guarantee I'd get my $5k, I'd gladly take that challenge and change that number to 110mph.
    Congrats on your boat, but if you're under the impression that nobody has gone faster than 86mph with a cheetah because they can't, you're sorely mistaken.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    642

    Default

    This entire thread has disintegrated into guys who have never tried something
    arguing with racers that have done and seen the results in SAWs or oval racing.

    This is why so many experienced racers have given up on offering suggestions here.
    Because somehow others know better.....despite the facts that we know from competition.

    Yes....sanded bottoms are better, faster and more stable in both turns and straightaways.
    TenShock Brushless / Pro Marine
    NEU Motors / Rico Racing/ Castle Creations
    2023 NAMBA & 2018 IMPBA FE High Points "National Champion"

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,585

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TRUCKPULL View Post
    When Racing, it does not matter how fast your boat is in a straight line.

    Larry
    Good thing Larry because I have never seen you drive a straight line.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,119

    Default

    My tests back in the early 90 , I tilted a hull 45* I took a drop of water on the bow and timed it how long it took to the transom, I used wax, I used Teflon spray silicone spray and bare surface and a scuffed surface and scuff surface was the fastest I scuff and sharpen all my hulls ! with 220-400 grits,, lots you can do to improve a cats handling and top speed !!

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by keithbradley View Post
    What a silly statement. Too bad it's an empty promise.
    If you had a way to guarantee I'd get my $5k, I'd gladly take that challenge and change that number to 110mph.
    Congrats on your boat, but if you're under the impression that nobody has gone faster than 86mph with a cheetah because they can't, you're sorely mistaken.
    I can hold the money ?????

  15. #45
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    1,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dasboata View Post
    I can hold the money ?????
    I can watch you hand it over!
    "If guns cause crime, all of mine are defective"
    45"Speedfreek
    , Fightercat #068 ​, MyYoutube Vids

  16. #46
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    fl
    Posts
    131

    Default

    I remember many years ago (30 plus) Jack Oxley was trying to sent the outboard drag record and after several attempts put scratches on the bottom, he then went out and broke the record. Prior to Jack, Art Carlson had the same results after taking his keys to the bottom. My experience on real boats and we tested a lot of things including graphite is a lightly sanded bottom (320 to 600) at and angle was always the best.

  17. #47
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    1,501

    Default

    1. The purpose of wax is primarily to protect your finish and secondarily to enhance the shine. If the finish is in good shape, some people argue that wax can't make it any shinier because it just adds a layer on top of the perfectly shiny finish.


      Does wax make your car go faster? Reduce drag? If that were the case then all the NASCAR people would be waxing their cars instead of tweaking things and finding ways to reduce drag. Thats like saying by adding a sticker that says "Turbo" and putting it on your car makes it go faster.....
    "If guns cause crime, all of mine are defective"
    45"Speedfreek
    , Fightercat #068 ​, MyYoutube Vids

  18. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Haha guys! point taken. So Keith, in single set up in addittion to a pretty big MGM what Lehner you think could get A cheetah to 110?

  19. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    This stuff had been great on escs. I wonder if it has any use on the hull.
    http://youtu.be/IPM8OR6W6WE

  20. #50
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,010

    Cool

    This entire thread has disintegrated into guys who have never tried something arguing with racers that have done and seen the results in SAWs or oval racing...This is why so many experienced racers have given up on offering suggestions here.
    Because somehow others know better.....despite the facts that we know from competition.

    This. ^^^^




    When Racing, it does not matter how fast your boat is in a straight line....
    So this guy has never passed someone on the straight to take over lane one in the next turn? No wonder he thinks speed doesn't matter....



    .
    ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for


  21. #51
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Correct, I do mot race. Just ended up with a pretty quick cheetah. It appears everyone thinks this hull with a single motor could go much faster. Just out of curiosity, with the right driver how would a 90+mph cheetah ever lose any oval race. the boat is know to turn with the best of them.

  22. #52
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Haines View Post
    This entire thread has disintegrated into guys who have never tried something
    arguing with racers that have done and seen the results in SAWs or oval racing.

    This is why so many experienced racers have given up on offering suggestions here.
    Because somehow others know better.....despite the facts that we know from competition.

    Yes....sanded bottoms are better, faster and more stable in both turns and straightaways.
    well said !!!!! everyone is a know it all, experience doesn't matter any more , who's got the best line of $hit or best sales pitch wins,, sad but true the world is upside down,, and I'm tied of trying to convince anyone that is stuck on there own stubbornness,, I competed for IMPBA & NAMBA official SAW records for 10 years and heat raced for another 10,,,,, frustrated

  23. #53
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    On
    Posts
    561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bduncan View Post
    what's your point? my mercedes goes 195
    195 what ? on water ?

  24. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On
    Posts
    7,279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bduncan View Post
    Correct, I do mot race. Just ended up with a pretty quick cheetah. It appears everyone thinks this hull with a single motor could go much faster. Just out of curiosity, with the right driver how would a 90+mph cheetah ever lose any oval race. the boat is know to turn with the best of them.
    Well, as you admit you never race...then you will never understand why it won't.

  25. #55
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    I am bery aware my mercedes wont do 195 on water. thanks for pointing that out.

  26. #56
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Very interesting considering, after seeing some videos of the boat turning. Keith Bradley
    suggested i bring this boat to Michigan to possibly set a record that he currently holds. Maybe he was pulling my chain. Was a month or so ago.

  27. #57
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    6,192

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fluid View Post
    So this guy has never passed someone on the straight to take over lane one in the next turn? No wonder he thinks speed doesn't matter....
    No Jay, Larry takes your lane before he's done passing you in the straight. Sorry Larry, I couldn't resist. You need to see Larry's twin Mean Machine Jay. Disturbing. Can't finish to save it's life but OH that back straight...........zzzzzzzzzzing!

    Wasn't this thread about wax vs scuff? I think I said it would descend into name calling.

    Guys, you need to let go of the notion that GPS is just the same as straight lines. It ain't the same. For all the reasons Keith described. Keith and I argue about everything. He's right this time. Wind, acceleration, ripples, aim, maintain the speed for a given distance, do it twice in a row. If Keith built another twin Cheetah I suspect 110 would be light. Twin cats is kinda his thing. Wouldn't make sense though since there are better options to go Q twin if you just want to go straight.

    I'm not discounting everyone's GPS speeds. I get that some are satisfied with that but the notion that it's a duplication of the efforts guys put into running through the lights is nonsense. That's like me telling the top fuel drag boat guys that I'm just as fast as them cuz my GPS said so. Not because I didn't go that fast but because I didn't do it under the same conditions that the top fuel guys did. There's more to being a top fuel racer than just the digits.

    So please stop demanding that the SAW guys acknowledge GPS accomplishments as equal. They simply aren't and I'm no SAW guy.

    A Cheetah wont turn well much over 62 mph. Same handling characteristics as an AM Sprintcat since it's very nearly an identical bottom. It doesn't turn quite as crisp as the Sprint though. Never quite figured out why that was. The Cheetah tends to nose in where the Sprint doesn't. You can go faster but you have to slow down a tick to make the turn. That's only if you nailed the start and are leading. If your chasing you get to run in crap water. By the 4th lap it's ocean racing. Now you're getting waves coming at you from every direction. Here's where the real skill takes over. Pucker factor 5. Weeeeeeeeeeeee! I think this is what Larry was talking about.

    90 mph oval cat? Enjoy that first ripple and bring a diver. You'll need him to find the parts.
    Noisy person

  28. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    boat ran 88 with single.

  29. #59
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    La
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Here is the single cheetah on 7s just screwing around. it turns just fine.

    http://youtu.be/FVcAE5S_1jU

  30. #60
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    6,192

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bduncan View Post
    it turns just fine.
    Looked like you slowed to turn. Which is what I said. You can't turn at 65+.

    You asked how a 90 mph cat could ever lose a heat. I explained that the Cheetah has it's limitations by sharing my experience with it. That wasn't an opinion. I've raced it. That's not enough for ya though because of your heat racing experience and level of expertise........I guess.

    One boat by itself on a glass pond with no buoy doesn't necessarily display a boats ability to handle a turn in traffic at speed in a heat. The thing was designed to be an oval cat from inception. I know this to be true because the first one out of the mold came to MI. It's pretty decent on 4s at our around 55. 6s it gets a little less predictable. That's on an oval, in traffic, yada yada yada.

    Are we really doing this? Ken was right. The level of expertise possessed right out of the gates on here has reached new heights of late. I hope I never get good enough to stop listening to those with more experience than me. I've caught myself on race days trying to listen to pointers from guys not even talking to me. Buass says "raise that strut 1/64"" I just do it.
    Noisy person

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •