Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 55

Thread: trim tabs on miss geico

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default trim tabs on miss geico

    Hi, new guy here. New to boating but not rc. I got bit by the boat bug about a month ago and bought a shockwave 26. Then ended up buying a miss geico 29. The bouncing....omg. cant stand it. I ordered the offset rudder. Tried different strut positions. Tried different battery positions. Tried different props. I have an x642 on there at the moment. I thought about putting trim tabs on. I know some of you dont agree with that but it doesnt bother me. I read on here where one guy put trim tabs on and it helped. Didnt really elaborate tho.

    What do you guys think. Btw, sanding and repainting to blue print the bottom is not something I want to do. Heres my fleet btw. What ive collected in a month lol
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Trim tabs on a Cat can help, but they are a band-aide for a setup issue. They induce drag, that will force the nose down.

    I will be the first to admit that the MG has some "bounce" to it out of the box. However, most have been able to tune this out using proper strut and battery position, and picking the right prop. There are countless threads on it here.

    Let us know how the tabs work out for you. Could be the ticket.

    If you get adventurous, look at my "MG Race Prep" thread and attack the job of blue-printing the ride surfaces. This helps a ton. None of my race-boats "bounce", but they've been tuned and tweaked to get them there. The factory ride-pads are pretty "concave". Put a straight-edge on them to see yourself. Takes some work to get flat, but worth it if you are really interested in optimal performance.

    Hopefully, Pro Boat can work with their manufacturers to get these a little cleaner out of the molds so this kind of custom work wouldn't be necessary.
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,585

    Default

    Rase the strut to about a 1/4" above the sponsons. You may have to open up the strut to do it though. I have no Bounce in mine. Also put it on a flat table and check to see
    how straight it is. They need work.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    I would have never bought this boat had I researched it better beforehand. Its dupposed to be rtr out the box. Then it says capable of 50+ mph. Yea right. At 35mph mine blew over. Im a proboat fan obviously, but the thought of sanding and repainting a 4 day old boat just to be able to drive it, just doesnt sit right with me. Youd think proboat would have taken notice of this issue and corrected it by now.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,585

    Default

    Welcome to the world or RTR Boats. Start researching some better hulls. There are tons if you want to put all the hardware on yourself.
    You will find all boats need some work.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    337

    Default

    Some guys say blue printing works wonders, some guys say its a waste of time.

    I've been able to get the bounce out of my mystic. You need to adjust the strut up and angle down, and battery placement for CG. Every hull is slightly different. You just need to tweak, and tweak, and tweak some more until you get it to stop bouncing.

    You have to find that sweet spot where she rides high but stays stable.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kfxguy View Post
    I would have never bought this boat had I researched it better beforehand. Its dupposed to be rtr out the box. Then it says capable of 50+ mph. Yea right. At 35mph mine blew over. Im a proboat fan obviously, but the thought of sanding and repainting a 4 day old boat just to be able to drive it, just doesnt sit right with me. Youd think proboat would have taken notice of this issue and corrected it by now.
    If you take it out of the box, throw 6S in it, and expect to go 50, it ain't happening. If you take a few minutes to set it up properly, THEN throw 6S in it, you'll get very, very close. It's not like an RC car... You don't just DRIVE it fast... You have to get it setup first.

    I've NEVER blown one of these off the water, and I RACE them near 50mph all the time. I've rolled them a lot, but it's pretty rare to blow one off, if they are setup correctly.

    Set your strut height, get your batteries in the right location, and go play.

    All that said, just because the box says it is CAPABLE of 50mph on 6S, doesn't mean you can just GET there without some tinkering... No two of these are alike and you have to make some adjustments to go from stable at 35mph, to stable at 50...

    That's just the nature of Boats and running across the water.

    SO... Exactly WHAT is your setup right now??

    1) Strut Height? (3/16 - 1/4" above the table)
    2) Strut Angle?? (FLAT - no upward or downward angle)
    3) Battery Position?? (CG should start around 30%, or ~8.75-9" from the back of the sponsons. )

    Let's start from there...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    ... Believe me... I, of all people, would LOVE for these to come out perfectly out of the box. Believe me! Everytime someone finds a flaw, I do feedback the information to Pro Boat in an effort to get it corrected, or at least note it for the next development phase.

    All I can say is that I think they are getting better every year. All RTRs have some kind of issue out of the box. Production compromises and costs and a companies desire for a profit margin can often create less that perfect designs or products.

    Hopefully, we can build on the experiences each time to create better and better products.

    They are certainly better than they used to be, and, I think, getting better with each release.

    :)
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    ON
    Posts
    9,402

    Default

    Just a setup Question Darin: At the Mi Cup last June I ran my modded Geico in P-Limited offshore and P-limited cat. The strut is level with hull bottom and in the 4min race I ran a OSE S/B M445, in the 6 lap sprint I ran same AQ1800kv motor esc and batts but, used a D/T x447 prop.

    Since I flipped once in offshore I was out of the running but, the motor and esc were decent temps coming back after 4 min. After the 6 lapper races I had to Post cool the motor because it was hitting 150*F+ . I am going to add extra cooling so motor gets fresh water but, can you advise me on anything I could change to bring temps down? I did come in 1st place in the 6 lapper event and the motor is still going fine but, too hot for my liking.

    Any suggestions?
    Nortavlag Bulc

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    Well im not sure of my strut angle or height. I tried it all over the place. If I raise it like you guys suggest, my mph goes from 37.2 to 30mph. Thats alot and it doesnt completely cure the wawawa that it does. I ordered the offset rudder from a black jack. Im going to try trim tabs this weekend. Ill of course report back. I sldo have a 1515 2200kv castle motor to go in it. Ive already put a 120 amp turnigy esc in.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ray schrauwen View Post
    The strut is level with hull bottom and in the 4min race I ran a OSE S/B M445, in the 6 lap sprint I ran same AQ1800kv motor esc and batts but, used a D/T x447 prop.
    I've never tried it with the AQ motor, but your strut seems too low to me for that diameter of prop. A lot of blade in the water...

    If found that these hulls handle REALLY well with a smaller diameter prop, like an X440/3, with some pitch added if necessary. The 1800 AQ motor is truely 1800KV, and has lots of torque. The 2030 is actually more like 1960KV, so if you figure out the % difference there, you can figure out how much more pitch you need at 1800KV to make up for the speed.

    Mine would trip on the outside sponson in rougher water once things get choppy with the X447 or X450 props (running 1500KV at the time). Boat was REALLY fast... I was usually out front by a good margin when it would happen. With the higher KV and smaller prop, it doesn't seem to happen.

    Hope this helps some.
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    Id split the cooling up. Stock motor on 4s with x642 prop mine runs pretty warm with stock cooling. Ill be doing d
    some cooling mods this week.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    What prop should I try with the castle 2200kv on 4s. 1515 series motor. Im looking for about 50mph

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kfxguy View Post
    What prop should I try with the castle 2200kv on 4s. 1515 series motor. Im looking for about 50mph
    With that power system, on 4S, if you can't hit a VERY confortable 50mph with an ABC 42x55 (Grim 42x55)... then you aren't doing something right!
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    ... I would look at an X440/3 as well. You can run the strut right about at the bottom of the sponsons (flat on the table), or slightly up (1/16" or so)... Boat should comfortably run with that setup. There is way more power there than the hull can realistically handle, so your goal shouldn't be a problem.

    Like Howard and others have said, however, it takes some setup and getting the balance right.
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    I have a 1512 2650kv castle too. What about 3s on it? That setup is in my shockwave right now. You want to see something grossly overpowered.....check this out
    My geico is at the end of the video. The shockwave is on 3s with the castle 2650kv motor.

    Heres the shockwave 26 on 4s with a smaller prop. With the larger prop it was way more uncontrollable. Lol

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpOc...e_gdata_player

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11Yd...e_gdata_player

    heres the shockwave again

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kfxguy View Post
    I have a 1512 2650kv castle too. What about 3s on it? That setup is in my shockwave right now. You want to see something grossly overpowered.....check this out
    My geico is at the end of the video. The shockwave is on 3s with the castle 2650kv motor.
    I'd proceed with the 1515 1Y if it were me. A pair of 2S packs, one in each side, and watch your runtime. You'll find you can run almost as long as you did with the stock setup, however. The Neus are just way more efficient, and that motor won't even be working hard with that boat, which is what you want.

    Then, concentrate on tuning and getting it handling right. Once you are there, then learn how to "tweak" props and play with the prop you already know works.
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,585

    Default

    If he leaves the setup the same and just swaps power systems he will still have the same problems. I am concerned that it was only good for 37. My setup and an m445 was getting close to 50. I could go up to an m447 but the aq1800 was at its limit. Personally I have swapped better motors in for sport running all about 2200kv and stuck with the same props. Most setups only pull 80 to 90 amps and are all over 50mph. I swapped a neu 1515/1y 2200kv into my spec rigger with a H7 and hit 63. Everything was under 100 degrees on a 120 amp controller. Just keep working it.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by photohoward1 View Post
    If he leaves the setup the same and just swaps power systems he will still have the same problems. I am concerned that it was only good for 37. My setup and an m445 was getting close to 50. I could go up to an m447 but the aq1800 was at its limit. Personally I have swapped better motors in for sport running all about 2200kv and stuck with the same props. Most setups only pull 80 to 90 amps and are all over 50mph. I swapped a neu 1515/1y 2200kv into my spec rigger with a H7 and hit 63. Everything was under 100 degrees on a 120 amp controller. Just keep working it.
    I don't disagree, Howard... The 1800KV AQ with the same 42x55 should still be good for at least 45mph... consistently. My IM31 with the Pro Boat 1800 (which admittedly doesn't have the power that the 1800AQ has), with that prop, is a 42mph boat, and it's a mono...

    Listen to Howard... He knows! :)
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    So stock with just a prop change on 4s it runs 37mph. It should be faster?

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kfxguy View Post
    So stock with just a prop change on 4s it runs 37mph. It should be faster?
    If it's blowing off the water at that speed, then yes... with the right prop... and setup properly. A prop change on the Revolt with that motor is good for well into the 40's... and it's a Mono...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    Mine has a 1500kv motor. Am I missing something?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kfxguy View Post
    Mine has a 1500kv motor. Am I missing something?
    No, I must have missed something... I thought you said it had an Aquacraft 1800KV motor... I'm responding to too many threads today! :)

    You'll need 6S with the 1500KV motor to go 50... (is that really on the box?? They must have added it recently, because it didn't used to be... Did it come with an 80A ESC??)

    You CAN get there with the 4S setup, but you'll need to run an X447/3 or similar prop... My stock MG, one of the very first in the country, hit 47-48mph using a Prather 230 prop... Handling isn't ideal with that much prop, however.
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    Came with a 60 amp esc. I yanked it before running it and and put a 120 amp esc in. The box does say capable of 50 plus mph. So you saying I need a three blade prop?

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    5,666

    Default

    You have gotten great advice PERSONALLY from Darin, that is great! I really don't want to hijack, but I understand that he is busy and you are waiting for responses, so if I may tell you my opinion on this: it is admirable that you don't mind going thru the trouble putting trim tabs on, and you seem to have two goals at the same time, hit 50+ mph and get rid of the wawawa's.
    If I were you I will concentrate on getting rid of the bounce first, then you can increase your speed.
    My MG came with a 2200kv ( Leopard4082) , out of the box ( new boat and motor) with a X642 it clocked 53+ mph. But I was bothered by the bounces, tried everything, in the end I trued the last two steps of the sponsons and the bounce was gone. So I am a believer in that process. You need to also adjust the angle of the strut, just by moving it up won't do most of the time because the stuffing tube is arched and pulling it up will result in an excessive positive thrust prop. Like someone said, you need to enlarge the hole on the strut blade so you can "gain" adjustability on the strut. I believe there is a thread by a member and in it he showed pictures of just what I am saying.
    To you and Darin I apologize for interrupting.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    No need to apologize. I appreciate your response. Im gonna mess around with it this weekend. I did change angles, height etc. Didnt make the hole bigger tho. If I can find a lime green paint color I like then ill flatten the bottom and repaint it. Seems like alot of work tho for something that shouldnt have such a bad flaw from the get go. I never noticed a motley crew doing this in all the vids I watched. O well. Ill over come it.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    So I put a straight edge on my ride pads this evening. The rear two are perfectly flat. The bost does not sit flat on my counter however. It teeters. I moved the strut to be level with the ride pads. It was hanging 1/4" lower how I had it.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    5,666

    Default

    That's good news! You are right: 1/4" below is too low. Raise it gradually and observe. Watch out for the angle as you raise it---as Darin said, it should be neutral. I had to point mine down to have 1-1.5* negative, otherwise I will catch air and blow over on a straight pass, no such issue if I drive in a large turning radius.
    The inner edge of the last two ride pads should be flat on your table, or at least symmetrically shaped. Then the sponsons curve upward as you go to the front. Yes, if you "rock" the boat front and back, it will have a slight "seesaw" movement, but when the boat is riding correctly on the water, I believe these two sections of riding pads count the most.
    My MG was the earlier batch and if I put a straight edge there will be lower"valley" spots on those ride pads, though not too bad but enough to warrant a closer look and fix. There are other members who had gone further to improve the pads and I am sure you will find plenty info on that. Not trying to say that is what you need to do---obviously your pads are good, I am just saying my case.
    Last edited by tlandauer; 10-09-2013 at 01:05 AM. Reason: explanation added

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    la
    Posts
    8,740

    Default

    Im considering selling it and just taking a loss. Its got two runs on it. I think I might just get a mean machine hull. What would be a fair price minus the electronics?

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kfxguy View Post
    Im considering selling it and just taking a loss. Its got two runs on it. I think I might just get a mean machine hull. What would be a fair price minus the electronics?
    Well... we tried... Best of luck.
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •