Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: How to eliminate BEC on SeaKing 180

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    355

    Default How to eliminate BEC on SeaKing 180

    My understanding is that to use a receiver battery on my SeaKing 180 instead of BEC I have to disconnect a wire on the connector to the esc.
    Which one?
    Red /hot?
    Black/ ground?
    White / signal?
    So should I disconnect the red?
    Thanks for your info?
    KartRacer ~ Dennis B
    Delta Force Pirate 35'~Leopard 4092~1480Kv~Seaking 180~2X6S 65C 5000 Mha Dynogy Lipo,Parallel

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,573

    Default

    Red

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    3,070

    Default

    If you don't want to mess with the actual wires on the esc, you can add a servo extention cable and just clip/disconnect the red wire on that.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    355

    Default

    Thanks wanted to be sure. I'll pull the red terminal out of plug.
    KartRacer ~ Dennis B
    Delta Force Pirate 35'~Leopard 4092~1480Kv~Seaking 180~2X6S 65C 5000 Mha Dynogy Lipo,Parallel

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NS
    Posts
    577

    Default

    the MIDDLE ONEE!!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Tx
    Posts
    182

    Default

    But does disconnecting the red wire actually disable the bec in the esc? Or does it not having that draw give the same affect as disabling it?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    ma
    Posts
    1,361

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpeedFreak_86 View Post
    But does disconnecting the red wire actually disable the bec in the esc? Or does it not having that draw give the same affect as disabling it?
    It eliminates he draw, like you said.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    on
    Posts
    2,187

    Default

    I believe it's what's known as a switching regulator, it only "does what's required" in terms of load, no load - no amp draw, or very little.
    A regulator like a 7805 just keeps cranking out the juice with the "excess" dissipating as heat.
    If my boats upside down then who owns the one I thought I was driving the last two laps?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Au
    Posts
    129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by siberianhusky View Post
    I believe it's what's known as a switching regulator, it only "does what's required" in terms of load, no load - no amp draw, or very little.
    A regulator like a 7805 just keeps cranking out the juice with the "excess" dissipating as heat.
    Sort of right, but not quite.

    Yes a switching regulator "does what's required" in terms of delivering the correct voltage to the load (servos and receiver) at whatever current the load requires, and does so with minimal losses (minimal heat). A linear regulator like the 7805 also "does what's required" in terms of delivering the correct voltage to the load (servos and receiver) at whatever current the load requires, but it does so by the dissipating excess voltage (i.e. the difference between the LiPo cell voltage and the 5V - 5.5V required by the servos/receiver), in heat within the regulator.

    And therein lies the problem with linear regulators. As the number of LiPo cells increases, the heat in the regulator increases even though the actual power required by the servo and receiver stays the same.

    Example: Say the servo/receiver needs 0.5A at 5V. If the main Lipo battery is 7.4V then the power dissipated in the linear regulator is 0.5A x (7.4-5.0V) = 1.2 watts.
    But if the battery is 22V then the heat dissipated in the regulator is 0.5A x (22.0-5.0V) = 8.5 watts! That is some serious heat!
    Of course, if the linear regulator is not connected to anything at it's output (no load) , then that's fine, no power/heat at all dissipated in the regulator regardless of LiPo voltage 0.0A x (22.0-5.0V) = 0 watts

    With "switching" style regulators (as per later version T180 ESC's) the losses (heat) in the regulator is pretty much a constant, regardless of LiPo voltage and load, typically about 20% loss in the regulator i.e 5.0V x 0.5A x 20% = 0.5W

    So switching style BEC regulators are the only way to go. And I think pretty much that's how they all are today, including the internal BEC in the T180.

    Cheers,

    Jon

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    940

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JonD View Post
    Sort of right, but not quite.

    Yes a switching regulator "does what's required" in terms of delivering the correct voltage to the load (servos and receiver) at whatever current the load requires, and does so with minimal losses (minimal heat). A linear regulator like the 7805 also "does what's required" in terms of delivering the correct voltage to the load (servos and receiver) at whatever current the load requires, but it does so by the dissipating excess voltage (i.e. the difference between the LiPo cell voltage and the 5V - 5.5V required by the servos/receiver), in heat within the regulator.

    And therein lies the problem with linear regulators. As the number of LiPo cells increases, the heat in the regulator increases even though the actual power required by the servo and receiver stays the same.

    Example: Say the servo/receiver needs 0.5A at 5V. If the main Lipo battery is 7.4V then the power dissipated in the linear regulator is 0.5A x (7.4-5.0V) = 1.2 watts.
    But if the battery is 22V then the heat dissipated in the regulator is 0.5A x (22.0-5.0V) = 8.5 watts! That is some serious heat!
    Of course, if the linear regulator is not connected to anything at it's output (no load) , then that's fine, no power/heat at all dissipated in the regulator regardless of LiPo voltage 0.0A x (22.0-5.0V) = 0 watts

    With "switching" style regulators (as per later version T180 ESC's) the losses (heat) in the regulator is pretty much a constant, regardless of LiPo voltage and load, typically about 20% loss in the regulator i.e 5.0V x 0.5A x 20% = 0.5W

    So switching style BEC regulators are the only way to go. And I think pretty much that's how they all are today, including the internal BEC in the T180.

    Cheers,

    Jon
    Thank Jon,

    Great info and it explains plenty to me!
    I am new to Electric power and just could not understand why all of the ESC failures happening. Not saying BEC was always the cause but it sure looks like it is #1 reason.
    I was just talking about these failures yesterday and said I wonder if it could be the use of Hi power draw servo's?

    Mike
    Last edited by Mike Caruso; 11-12-2012 at 07:18 AM. Reason: text add

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    on
    Posts
    2,187

    Default

    Cool! Always happy to lean more about something!
    The only electronics I really know is how to make old hand wired guitar tube amps work again, they are simple!
    If my boats upside down then who owns the one I thought I was driving the last two laps?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,573

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JonD View Post
    Sort of right, but not quite.

    Yes a switching regulator "does what's required" in terms of delivering the correct voltage to the load (servos and receiver) at whatever current the load requires, and does so with minimal losses (minimal heat). A linear regulator like the 7805 also "does what's required" in terms of delivering the correct voltage to the load (servos and receiver) at whatever current the load requires, but it does so by the dissipating excess voltage (i.e. the difference between the LiPo cell voltage and the 5V - 5.5V required by the servos/receiver), in heat within the regulator.

    And therein lies the problem with linear regulators. As the number of LiPo cells increases, the heat in the regulator increases even though the actual power required by the servo and receiver stays the same.

    Example: Say the servo/receiver needs 0.5A at 5V. If the main Lipo battery is 7.4V then the power dissipated in the linear regulator is 0.5A x (7.4-5.0V) = 1.2 watts.
    But if the battery is 22V then the heat dissipated in the regulator is 0.5A x (22.0-5.0V) = 8.5 watts! That is some serious heat!
    Of course, if the linear regulator is not connected to anything at it's output (no load) , then that's fine, no power/heat at all dissipated in the regulator regardless of LiPo voltage 0.0A x (22.0-5.0V) = 0 watts

    With "switching" style regulators (as per later version T180 ESC's) the losses (heat) in the regulator is pretty much a constant, regardless of LiPo voltage and load, typically about 20% loss in the regulator i.e 5.0V x 0.5A x 20% = 0.5W

    So switching style BEC regulators are the only way to go. And I think pretty much that's how they all are today, including the internal BEC in the T180.

    Cheers,

    Jon
    Uhm....huh? Yeah, uhhhhh.... Just unplug the red wire

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Au
    Posts
    129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by siberianhusky View Post
    The only electronics I really know is how to make old hand wired guitar tube amps work again, they are simple!
    Now that's a skill in it's own right! Nothing like the sound of a good classic valve guitar amp. I have a Vox AC30 myself and wouldn't change it for anything!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •