Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Teflon stuffing box/shaft tube liners -- good or bad?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    304

    Default Teflon stuffing box/shaft tube liners -- good or bad?

    Being of the old school, make that very old school, I have seen flex shafts and teflon lined tubing for over 40 years. I am somewhat surprised at the popularity of teflon liners still used today. What would be really interesting to me is to know how many record setting boats have set records while using these liners??? Do you use these liners or do you not?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mo
    Posts
    2,716

    Default

    Nope...you also have to remember the bigger the cable the more wear on a liner...to the point of it melting. We also never had the power or rpm back then as we do today. It still works but brass works well. Cap the motor end with a vac nipple and put a hole in it to stop any water coming up the tube. A cable is like a pump.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    252

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Wohlt View Post
    Nope...you also have to remember the bigger the cable the more wear on a liner...to the point of it melting. We also never had the power or rpm back then as we do today. It still works but brass works well. Cap the motor end with a vac nipple and put a hole in it to stop any water coming up the tube. A cable is like a pump.
    That's very Interesting I'm going to have to try that on a single motor setup. I get the cvac plug but the drilling a hole. If I'm following your statement, you're saying put a hole into the brass stuffing tube. This will create the low pressure for water to escape instead of running up into the motor and collet. Can this be drilled in a catamaran in the section right where the tube exit the hull? Thank you for the wonderful post and ingenuity.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Ca
    Posts
    974

    Default

    I still use Teflon in my saw boats and so do half of the others that come out. I don't use it in my gas size sport hydro but everything else I do. They also use it a lot over in Europe, even on all of the big cats.

    Mark

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NS
    Posts
    577

    Default

    well apparantly the teflon has a pretty high melting point, so to be honest if you melt your teflon liner, its probably somthing in the drive setup thats caused it
    https://www.google.com.au/search?q=t...ient=firefox-a

    I havent really had any trouble with teflon liners, but i do "glue" them in using spray on glue. seems to be enough to fix it in and stop it from rotating, but easy enough to remove it

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    sc
    Posts
    770

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by b20btec View Post
    That's very Interesting I'm going to have to try that on a single motor setup. I get the cvac plug but the drilling a hole. If I'm following your statement, you're saying put a hole into the brass stuffing tube. This will create the low pressure for water to escape instead of running up into the motor and collet. Can this be drilled in a catamaran in the section right where the tube exit the hull? Thank you for the wonderful post and ingenuity.
    What Jeff is saying is,put a hole in the vac nipple,not the stuffing tube.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Posts
    747

    Default

    important things when using teflon liner:
    -only one bend, no "S" curve
    -smooth bend, not sharp edgy
    -have still a round shape, not an oval one
    -good alignment to the drive and the motor/coupler

    These are the few rules from my experience. I also use Teflon liner in all of my boats, also the high rpm SAW boats with 1/4" flex cable and 60mm props - works excellent and almost without friction.

    regards,
    Manuel

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,969

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ManuelW View Post
    important things when using teflon liner:
    -only one bend, no "S" curve
    -smooth bend, not sharp edgy
    -have still a round shape, not an oval one
    -good alignment to the drive and the motor/coupler

    These are the few rules from my experience. I also use Teflon liner in all of my boats, also the high rpm SAW boats with 1/4" flex cable and 60mm props - works excellent and almost without friction.

    regards,
    Manuel
    Hi,
    Why not an S-bend?

    Chief

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    252

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by h2o 1 View Post
    What Jeff is saying is,put a hole in the vac nipple,not the stuffing tube.
    Thanks for clearing that up, I had the drill ready to go.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Posts
    747

    Default

    @ Chief:
    I'd say less friction and it runs smoother. Here in Europe in FE its absolute standard to use flex shafts without any "S"-bend. The only ones here who use an "S"-bend are guys with gas engines and turbines as its often impossible to place it without one.

    regards,
    Manuel

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,969

    Default

    Some say an S-bend results in less friction and whipping effect vs. a U bend. I have 2 similar boats, one with S-bend, one is straight, they both run silky smooth. I wish I had one with a U-bend so I could compare 'em...

    Here's an interesting demonstration:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwq-3x0nLl8

    Chief

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    on
    Posts
    2,187

    Default

    Some that do some that don't, I don't run a liner, been at it since the 80's and never have. I firmly believe in KISS or if a part isn't on the boat it can't fail. Since I've never had a problem with plain brass, for me I see no reason to introduce another part for a solution to a problem I've never had.
    The finger dyno says both my Motley Crew and SV27 have less shaft friction with a plain brass stuffing tube vs the stock setup with teflon. No idea if it made any difference, made the changes before I ran either of the RTR boats I own.
    I honestly think it comes down to what you have experience with and are comfortable running. I've only seen a few pictures of exploded stuffing tubes due to teflon failure. Pretty rare either way if the driveline is set up properly and well maintained.
    If my boats upside down then who owns the one I thought I was driving the last two laps?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    304

    Default

    Interesting view point. I have been running flex shafts since the early 70's. Regarding "S" bends, testing verified that "S"bends reduce whip and vibration. Not necessarily less friction. On the other hand many guys running outrigger hydros took out a solid shaft and slipped a flex cable straight in with no curves of any kind and had good results. The next phase was to take standard outriggers and hang a strut bracket on the back and have the ability to make small adjustments with respect to prop depth and prop thrust angle. Impossible to do with a solid shaft but the main point was there was no gentile curve or "S" bend just a dead straight tube with a long 22 inch flex cable. We would remove the spacers and the 5 bearings and shove the flex shaft inside the pre-existing brass shaftstuffing box/tube. No problems great results. Oh. no teflon sleeves either.

    Dave

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    9,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by siberianhusky View Post
    Some that do some that don't, I don't run a liner, been at it since the 80's and never have. I firmly believe in KISS or if a part isn't on the boat it can't fail. Since I've never had a problem with plain brass, for me I see no reason to introduce another part for a solution to a problem I've never had.
    The finger dyno says both my Motley Crew and SV27 have less shaft friction with a plain brass stuffing tube vs the stock setup with teflon. No idea if it made any difference, made the changes before I ran either of the RTR boats I own.
    I honestly think it comes down to what you have experience with and are comfortable running. I've only seen a few pictures of exploded stuffing tubes due to teflon failure. Pretty rare either way if the driveline is set up properly and well maintained.
    is there a rule of thumb for how much bigger the stuffing tube needs to be vs the size of the flex shaft?
    I jacked my teflon lined stuffing tube today and took out the flex shaft with it in my PMono, now I need to rebuild it...
    thanks
    .NAMBA20...Caterpillar UL-1, P-Spec OM29, P-Mono DF33, P-Spec JAE, Aussie 33" Hydro-LSH, Sprintcat CC2028 on 8s, PT SS45 Q Hydro, PS295 UL-1 power, OSE Brothers Outlaw QMono 4-sale, Rio 51z CC2028 on 8s

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    304

    Default

    Yes there is a rule of thumb. But it is not etched in stone. You want the diameter of the inside of the tube to be a loose sloppy fit larger than the outside diameter of the flex shaft itself. Years ago when the norm was to use very thin flex cable (some were even wire shafts not stranded cable) it was thought that you should make the shaft log or tube as tight as possible without binding the rotation of the cable under load. This theory believed the tube gave strength to the flex cable by not allowing for knotting or kinking. In truth there is some evidence that this was true. However with the quest for speed it also said if you make the fit sloppy loose then the resistance was minimal and you went faster. So if you are looking for numbers as the answer I like the 1/3rd rule. Make the ID (inside diameter) of the sahft log 1/3rd bigger that the OD of the flex shaft. Most tubing is sold by the OD size. But all tubing suppliers can give you the nominal ID diamension as well. Typical thin wall K&S hobby grade tubing has a wall thickness of around .014. So K&S tubing make sliding fit step sizes available so that the ID of one size is close to the OD of the next smaller size. For example 1/8th flex cable (.125) you would like to use 5/32 inside diameter tubing or maybe 3/16th OD. 3/16th flex cable (.187) we like 7/32 tubing or 15/64th tubing. !/4 inch we like 9/32 ID or 5/16th OD tubing.

    Now just for my opinion, I do not blieve a teflon sleeve brings much to my party.

    Dave

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    9,488

    Default

    Ok, I have a .187 flex shaft so 1/4" or a bit bigger should do the trick...
    .NAMBA20...Caterpillar UL-1, P-Spec OM29, P-Mono DF33, P-Spec JAE, Aussie 33" Hydro-LSH, Sprintcat CC2028 on 8s, PT SS45 Q Hydro, PS295 UL-1 power, OSE Brothers Outlaw QMono 4-sale, Rio 51z CC2028 on 8s

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,887

    Default

    K&S brass stuffing tube O/D sizes with teflon,7/32" for .130", 1/4" for .150", 9/32" for .187", 11/32" for .250"

    Without teflon 3/16" for .130, 7/32" for .150", 1/4" for .187", 5/16" for .250".

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    OZ
    Posts
    686

    Default

    I know this is an old thread but wondering if anything conclusive has been reached. The reason I ask is a stinger drive assembly I was interested in made no mention of a stuffing tube teflon liner. I questioned the seller (an eBay seller specialising in racing/competition craft) and his reply was that the teflon liner was not supplied and actually not needed.

    The common sense part of me wants to believe a liner would be useful in preventing any wear on the stuffing tube. A damaged/ worn liner would be easier to replace than a stuffing tube. Is a liner just a hangup from days of old or has the ultimate quest for absolute speed over ruled the need for seemingly redundant parts in the drive train?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,010

    Default

    There is no concensus on liner vs no liner, both methods work. Personally I haven't used a Teflon liner in any of my non-RTR boats for over a decade. Some of those boats had well over 50 two-minute race heats on them with the same cable and I have never replaced a brass stuffing tube due to wear. I use 70W synthetic gear oil exclusively, and I seldom re-lube the cable between heats. Limited testing I did some years ago showed a slight frictional reduction without the Teflon liner. That said, some very fast boats use a liner......


    .
    ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for


  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    OZ
    Posts
    686

    Default

    Thankyou. I suppose then it is down to personal choice.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    304

    Default

    I guess besides the personal choice concept, I belief everyone agrees wearing out a brass unlined shaft tube is very unlikely provided some attempt to lubricate the flex cable is done. I am still waiting for any documented verification that someone has actually ever worn out a stuffing tube. Now I will also support the reason in part is by our very nature in this hobby that old boats don't wear out they get replaced before then, as we become dissatisfied and desire new technology and better performance.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    OK
    Posts
    1,464

    Default

    I've only heard of "sudden failures", not actually wearing out. As we all know, sudden failures are a failure in the setup, or the way the flex shaft was prepared. Seems with proper maintenance and preparation, the stuffing tube has a long life.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    OZ
    Posts
    686

    Default

    Many thanks gentlemen, food for thought.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •