Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: 3s or 4s in Mini Hydro keeping the same max rpm the same.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,887

    Default 3s or 4s in Mini Hydro keeping the same max rpm the same.

    As title says using say a 3400kv on 3s or 2550kv on 4s the max unloaded rpm is the same. Will they both produce the same speeds or will the 4s set up take a larger prop due to the higher voltage & lower amp draw. Their for producing more speed than the 3s set up, Both motors are the same just diff kv. Thanks Martin.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    nt
    Posts
    447

    Default


    Well put Martin, I wish I knew the answer to this aswell.
    Its had me wondering.
    FC Cheetah TP4092 1600KV Dinogy 6s2p,Etti Envoy WE 3s, Rico Mono 31" T600 1400kv Dinogy 5100mAh 65c 6s1p
    Popeye Hydro T600 1400kv 6s1p

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    6,453

    Default

    What size boat? What motor size (dimensions)?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,887

    Default

    Boat is a JAE Mini Sprint that ive run on 3800kv outrunner on 3s that runs very well, The motors im looking at using in future are either the Leopard 2860 or 2850 around the KV that i mention in the first post. So 3400kv on 3s & 2550kv on 4s.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    292

    Default

    I would think the 4S setup would be better with it's lower amp draw. This is my thinking with my small bolt. I am running it on 4S with the stock 2604kv motor. Of course starting with small props and hoping to work up to an X632.
    Pursuit: T-180, TP 4060/1620kv. Genesis: T-180, GoolRC 2000kv. UL-1: Bone stock. MHZ Tsunami: Full tilt SAW project!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,887

    Default

    Given the 2 examples i mention ie same unloaded rpm but with 2 diff kv motors & diff voltages is the 4s setup going to be faster simply because you can run larger props because of the lower amp motor on 4s & lower kv. If you were to run these 2 setups on the same prop would the speeds be the same as the unloaded rpm would be the same.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    2,730

    Default

    I would go 3s so you can prop down and race if you ever change your mind about not doing so.
    With the motors having the same rotor and weight of copper both will be capable of the same power output and swinging the same prop.
    If you are limited by space to say a 50A ESC, it's less than both motors are capable of and 50A at 4s is more power so you would be able to spin a bigger prop and go faster, if you have fitted a 120A ESC things will even out. Are you not happy with your HET1w30?
    Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,887

    Default

    Hi Paul, Im just modding the tub yet again to make more room inside. This time im making it quite a bit bigger inside so i can use diff set ups re motors & esc sizes & also able to get 4s in if i want to as well. Im going to a 120amp esc or even larger if needed, Ive got the HET 1W-30 also some Leopards 2845 4420kv, 2850 4430kv & 2860 3400kv all of which i will be running on 3s 60c. Im also looking at the Leopard 2860 2730kv & 2850 2950kv to poss use on 4s. I havnt use the HET motor yet. Martin.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    738

    Default

    Martin,
    is your HET 1W-30 motor this one?
    http://www.highendrc.com/index_eprod...roducts_id=167
    From the site:
    -KV 4400
    -No. of poles: 6
    -Max Current: 120 A
    -Power Nominal: 1400 Watts on 4 cells

    running this motor with a 60-100A ESC on 4s with a small prop would really, really scoot, but IM a noob.
    Is there a problem with spinning small balanced and sharpened props that fast?
    Cheetah, Super Rio, (Mod) Starship (Mod and sold),

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,887

    Default

    Yes that is the HET motor, 4s on that motor in a boat is to high even on 3s its a hot set up that requires short runs as its doing close to 49000rpm unloaded. The sort of amps these small motors can pull a 120amp esc is the best choice ecspecially if you use larger props for more speed. Martin.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    738

    Default

    I was thinking about my previous post, and your right about 3s is too much for a boat with that 4400 kv motor.
    I understand that with the KV that high, the amps would be huge, and amps = heat.
    Is the RPM a problem tho? Suppose you use their Typhoon EDF 2W-23
    http://www.highendrc.com/index_eprod...products_id=86
    the motoe has a KV = 2950, -Max Current: 75 A
    Running it on 4S nominal has an loaded RPM of 38000 (est from OSE calculator) or so, but the current would be much lower, hence lower heat.
    Assuming you could keep it cool and had a good prop, and the hull could handle it, would that RPM be a problem?
    Cheetah, Super Rio, (Mod) Starship (Mod and sold),

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    2,730

    Default

    I like High RPMs, and its not the automatic disaster that some will make out I have raced with 5 minute runtime on setups near 50k unloaded rpm effectively and know folk that have gone higher still, but there are issues and as a self confessed noob I suggest you gain some more experience before trying it. The problems with High RPMs are finding a prop small enough, props small enough not being big enough to push the hull efficiently increasing the slip angles, and bursting motors. Also at very high RPM going up just a couple off MM in prop can make the difference between an easy running cool setup and smelly black sludge in the bottom of your boat.

    Don't forget a boat isn't constantly loaded like a plane, it may well be doing just 38k when things are smooth but when you hit a wave the prop comes out of the water and it unloads to 50k, when it hits the water again it wont resume normal running hight instantly it will splash deep and fully submerge your prop which is doing 50k and pull LOTS of amps, if your gear can take it, if not you'll be cleaning smelly black sludge from the bottom of your boat and buying new gear.
    Paul Upton-Taylor, Greased Weasel Racing.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    GE
    Posts
    95

    Default

    A lot of ferry here. 3s or 4s with same RPM... well. What is the difference between the motor you use on 3s and the motor on 4s apart from kV? Allright, you found out about Ri (measured in mOhm). The more copper you add, the more Ri you get. And, is that what you want? Nope. Therefore 3s would have my personal preference.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,887

    Default

    Wouldnt the lower kv motor have a lower amp draw so larger props could be used but still have the same max rpm on 4s producing more speed than the higher kv motor on 3s. Martin.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    GE
    Posts
    95

    Default

    Dear Martin, the answer is yes and no! Okay, the lower amp motor on 4s could use a bigger prop, but on the detriment of runtimes.

    Let me give an example. In Europe we run Hydro I both on 2s and 3s. Given a certain RPM for both setups the props of 2s and 3s cannot differ in size theoretically. The weight of the LiPo is limited to 280gr and the racetime is 5:00. There might be an advantage of the 3s setup needing smaller and lighter ESC, cables and connectors, but that might also be leveled out by the higher Ri (internal resistance, Ohm) the motor on 3s has.

    In practice there are sometimes differences in what LiPos manufacturers can offer. Sometimes a 2s package may contain more energy weighing 280gr, sometimes this is true for a 3s package.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,887

    Default

    Hi Eric, I dont race so runtimes & cell weights are not relevent at all just pure fun & getting Max speeds for given set ups, I only run for short periods to keep temps down on hot set ups. Regards Martin.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    GE
    Posts
    95

    Default

    In Europe, SAW is always pushing to the max, seeking the limits. On 4s I assume 250A ESCs come to use combined with high pitch props. But I don't do SAW myself, only oval-heatracing (is a little cheaper).

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    543

    Default

    Martin, from the data I have collected on my Eagle tree on my mean machine I would say running the lower kv motor on 4s would be best. I had a 4074 2200kv on 5s2p with an x640 (yes i know its a 4s motor) and got 180amps @57mph. Now I have a 4082 1500kv on 5s2p with an M545 and getting 145 amps @ 53.6mph. I am willing to bet the M645 I have yet to try will break that 57mph with less amps. As you will know it stresses the esc a lot less with lower rpm/amps. I lowered the rpm by about 13k unloaded and lowered my amps and got close to the same speed. I would give it a shot, you have many choices with all the motors you have go for it and let us know the results!
    24 R/C vehicles and still counting...What budget?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    ar
    Posts
    878

    Default

    Remember, this is a 17" boat. And you're looking to increase the size of the tub for more battery space? I think you'll have more success at top speeds with a 2 cell lipo and a 4400kv outrunner motor. It will save weight, which will be the limiter here. Use a 60A esc to contend with the slightly higher amp draw and see what that does before opening the tub. IMHO.
    Legend 36 sailboat, KMB Powerjet Ed Hardy Viper, ABC jet pwrd BBY Oval Master, ABC Hobby Jetski, NQD Tear Into's, HK Discovery 500, MickieBeez pwrd Jet Rigger!, Davette/Gravtix jet sprint, KMB Powerjet Pursuit, NQD pwrd Jet Catamaran!,Steam pwrd African Queen, Sidewinder airboat, Graupner Eco Power

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,887

    Default

    Been down that route 4400kv on 2s then went 3800kv outrunner on 3s on 60amp esc, The 3800kv on 3s was substantially faster with an extra 10,000rpm unloaded. Ive moved on since that set up to a much more powerfull Leopard 28 inrunner series motors 4400kv on 3s & 3400kv on 4s & 120a esc. Martin.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    738

    Default

    martin, Which Leopard motor? Boat? Prop?
    3400 KV on 4s is attractive, but I was concerned with it blowing up from the RPM's. How does your rig handel it,
    Im looking for an upgrade to a customized Starship rigger I have.
    Cheetah, Super Rio, (Mod) Starship (Mod and sold),

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,887

    Default

    Boat is a modded JAE Mini Sprint, modded by building a deeper tub to get what i wont in. I have some Leopards to use ie 2845-4420kv on 3s, 2850-4430kv on 3s, 2860-3400kv on 4s & Het 1w-30 4400kv on 3s. My previous set up with the 3800kv outrunner on 3s used an Octura x435 detongued & back cut 10 degrees.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,887

    Default

    Drive hardware i also custom make as i use a .048" wire drive with 3 ball bearings in the strut. Also keeping run times short & 120amp esc helps out.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •