Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 32

Thread: Ammo motor slower than stock?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    92

    Default Ammo motor slower than stock?

    Hi guys,

    I've installed a new ammo 2300 motor, and I was dissapointed with the performance, I mean it was noticeably slower
    than with my stock setup??

    All my batteries, esc, prop setup is the same, i just changed the motor....

    this leads me to another question. I solderd on new 5.5mm bullet connectors from the esc and to the motor,
    my soldering isn't the best as i'm new to this, so if my soldering wasn't upto standard would the boat run any slower or
    would it just not work atall?

    My boat does run its just slower.. any ideas guys?

    Thanks for any help

    Tone

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,010

    Cool

    Assuming the motor is good, then you may have too much prop installed. Higher Kv motors often need smaller props, which they spin faster to make more speed. What prop are you using?

    There are other reasons for the low speed, but without seeing the boat it is hard to tell from half way across the world.



    .
    ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Hey Fluid,

    I'm using an x440 prop, thats been S&B...

    I'm asuming the motor is good, just got it brand new from OSE

    Tone

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Isn't an Ammo 2300 motor also a 2-pole motor, vs a 6-Pole for the stocker?? I think that's the case, and if it is, you are losing a BUNCH of torque...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AB
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darin Jordan View Post
    Isn't an Ammo 2300 motor also a 2-pole motor, vs a 6-Pole for the stocker?? I think that's the case, and if it is, you are losing a BUNCH of torque...
    I am not sure if the Ammo motors are 2 pole, as I bought a Ammo 1800 KV to put in my SV27 to replace the original blue can one, and there was NO difference in speed using the same prop ,( X642 ) and batteries, and run time, temps were the same. But as Fluid said you need to prop down on the Ammo 2300KV motors.
    There is no replacement for displacement, I guess I just have to Buzz it higher!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,010

    Cool

    I tried to find a definitive answer - no luck, but the consensus is that this is a 2-pole motor. You will lose some torque, but I would not you'd lose a "bunch" of torque - it is a slotless design. Still it should provide more speed and is recommended by Grimracer as a replacement motor for the SV27 - so it is not at all inappropriate. Perhaps the soldering job is poor, but then I'd expect more trouble than just slow. No changes in the transmitter or receiver settings? You really can't prop down any more, an x440 is small.

    Just because the motor is new doesn't mean it isn't defective. The Chinese motors have spotty QC and a bad one slips by now and then. Make no changes to ANYTHING, just swap out to the old SV motor and see how it runs. If it runs the same then I'd suspect the motor. Remember, change nothing else!


    .
    ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,010

    Cool

    There is no replacement for displacement...
    Of course there is! It's called positive manifold pressure. 3.0 liters, 18 psi, 340 rwhp.


    ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    329

    Default

    I agree with ya fluid....my 05 Subaru LGT 5eat wagon/ 2.5 (h4) turbo is pushing 318hp at the wheels 12.38 @124mph in the 1/4 mile.
    Picture 175.jpg
    I love the look on the drivers with a v8 when a wagon eats them up
    When you know it all.......you never will learn anything new

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    329

    Default

    Also...I called Joe Ford at CC the other day and he just happened to have an ammo motor (ammo 3656 1800kv) in his hand and I asked him if it was 2 , 4 or 6 pole.He counted it and confirmed that it is 6 pole motor.
    Daniel
    Last edited by 1truckerdan; 08-31-2011 at 07:52 PM.
    When you know it all.......you never will learn anything new

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,010

    Cool

    He counted it and confirmed that it is 6 pole motor.
    Good to know, so much for consensus.



    .
    ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Thanks for the input guys,

    I'll try the stock motor again, then retry the ammo...
    I hadn't changed any of the rx or tx settings, so i'll just wiat and see

    Thanks again

    Tone

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AB
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1truckerdan View Post
    I agree with ya fluid....my 05 Subaru LGT 5eat wagon/ 2.5 (h4) turbo is pushing 318hp at the wheels 12.38 @124mph in the 1/4 mile.
    Picture 175.jpg
    I love the look on the drivers with a v8 when a wagon eats them up
    I guess you have not drag raced a real V8
    Of course there is! It's called positive manifold pressure. 3.0 liters, 18 psi, 340 rwhp

    A big Block chev with that kind of boost would make at least 1200 HP.

    You need to go to Lethbridge Alberta, for the Street Machine weekend and see the 100 Ft drag racing, the Real Cars, 0-100ft in sub 2 second runs!
    There is no replacement for displacement, I guess I just have to Buzz it higher!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fluid View Post
    Good to know, so much for consensus.



    .
    HOWEVER... You guys are looking at the 1800 motor, and assuming that it's the same pole arrangement as the 2300KV motor... The 2300 motor is listed on the Tower site as a "slotless" motor design, so I'm not even sure how you'd count the number of poles without cutting the rotor apart.

    I could very well be wrong, but I KNOW a UL-1 motor is 6-pole, and most people that put one of those in their SV27 have no issues making the boat faster. The 2300KV, IF it's a 6-pole, with perhaps just a tad less prop, SHOULD provide an equivalent boost in performance... If it's considerably slower, then I'd suspect it's simply doesn't have as much torque/power, which may indicated it's NOT a 6-pole motor.

    Another clue might be that the AMMO 2300KV motor is a 36-50-2300, while the AMMO 1800 is a 36-56-1800... The "56" indicates that the 1800 motor has a 6mm longer rotor. That would give it more torque as well...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AB
    Posts
    110

    Default

    You need to remember, the higher the KV you go, you need to prop down, regardless if they have the same pole count! the torque is never the same with higher kv motors
    There is no replacement for displacement, I guess I just have to Buzz it higher!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    329

    Default

    I never claimed my Subi was a " drag race car" just that a 4 cylinder can keep up and pass a v8.( I also get 20+ mpg)
    A few years ago I helped a buddy put twin turbos on a 460 with only 7lb of boost and it was around 980hp and 1400lb of torque......remember the hp don't matter if you can't plant it to the pavement!
    When you know it all.......you never will learn anything new

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AB
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1truckerdan View Post
    I never claimed my Subi was a " drag race car" just that a 4 cylinder can keep up and pass a v8.( I also get 20+ mpg)
    A few years ago I helped a buddy put twin turbos on a 460 with only 7lb of boost and it was around 980hp and 1400lb of torque......remember the hp don't matter if you can't plant it to the pavement!
    That is why they invented very large tires ( 14 x 32 w ) and 4 link suspensions, I am not going to debate this.
    Top Fuel Dragsters +8000 hp with controlled clutch slippage
    There is no replacement for displacement, I guess I just have to Buzz it higher!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    329

    Default

    I am not arguing with yo bro...I drive my Subi every day on the road I Love it......thats all
    When you know it all.......you never will learn anything new

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AB
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Who said I was arguing, just stating facts, that is all.
    There is no replacement for displacement, I guess I just have to Buzz it higher!

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 7500RPM View Post
    You need to remember, the higher the KV you go, you need to prop down, regardless if they have the same pole count! the torque is never the same with higher kv motors
    Of course, this is true, as Jay and I both stated above... given the same motor dimensions... However, a 2300KV motor with 2-poles, vs. a 2300KV motor with 6, are two completely different animals... The 6-pole will have significantly more torque, and can, therefore, pull a lot more prop than the same KV in 2-Pole... It's the principle that allows our P-Limited motors to achieve such performance...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AB
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by makin' waves View Post
    Hi guys,

    I've installed a new ammo 2300 motor, and I was dissapointed with the performance, I mean it was noticeably slower
    than with my stock setup??

    All my batteries, esc, prop setup is the same, i just changed the motor....

    this leads me to another question. I solderd on new 5.5mm bullet connectors from the esc and to the motor,
    my soldering isn't the best as i'm new to this, so if my soldering wasn't upto standard would the boat run any slower or
    would it just not work atall?

    My boat does run its just slower.. any ideas guys?

    Thanks for any help

    Tone
    What batteries are you using?
    There is no replacement for displacement, I guess I just have to Buzz it higher!

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Hi guys, I'm using 7 cell nimhs,

    They're the same as i've been using with the stock, Also wizard has used the ammo motor and his boat touched just over 50mph...
    I'm thinkin i must have been unlucky and got a dud motor..

    Tone

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AB
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by makin' waves View Post
    Hi guys, I'm using 7 cell nimhs,

    They're the same as i've been using with the stock, Also wizard has used the ammo motor and his boat touched just over 50mph...
    I'm thinkin i must have been unlucky and got a dud motor..

    Tone
    The problem is the Nimh packs, Unless you are using Matched and Pushed cells this motor Will Not Perform with regular cells, due to the High Peak current demand this motor requires.
    There is no replacement for displacement, I guess I just have to Buzz it higher!

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    92

    Default

    I'm sure I've heard others say their boats are carzy on 14 cell nimhs with the ammo


    there's even a vid of one on youtube

    Tone

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by makin' waves View Post
    I'm sure I've heard others say their boats are carzy on 14 cell nimhs with the ammo


    there's even a vid of one on youtube

    Tone
    OK, what these guys are trying to tell you is that not ALL Nimh cells are created equal... The typical "sport packs" that you can buy these days don't have the voltage retention that a GOOD set of packs will have. They get pulled down under higher amps very quickly and therefore, the motor doesn't have as much RPM...

    How about you try using your buddies NiMH cells for a run and see if it's the batteries, or something else...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Hi Darin,

    The bloke on the vid says his nimhs are IB3600s (14 cells) and I'm using Intellect 5000 mah (14 cells)
    therfore i'm thinking my batteries should be faster?
    He is using a Cf48 prop, I'm using an X440 which in theory should work better because of the torque loss on the motor?

    which is the Ammo 36-50-2300KV and both on stock ESC's
    Does that sound right to you mate?

    Tone

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by makin' waves View Post
    Hi Darin,

    The bloke on the vid says his nimhs are IB3600s (14 cells) and I'm using Intellect 5000 mah (14 cells)
    therfore i'm thinking my batteries should be faster?
    He is using a Cf48 prop, I'm using an X440 which in theory should work better because of the torque loss on the motor?

    which is the Ammo 36-50-2300KV and both on stock ESC's
    Does that sound right to you mate?

    Tone
    Several things here...

    1) Depends on the condition of the cells... In theory, you are correct. The Intellect 5000 cells are good cells. However, the IB's were good cells too. Mah doesn't make one pack "faster" than the other... "Faster Longer", perhaps, but mah alone doesn't necessarily mean more speed. If he has "matched" and "zapped" IB3600s, and you have an Intellect 5000 mah "sport pack" (i.e.: random cells that Intellect had left after they built all their "race" packs), then he may have an advantage. His are lighter as well...

    2) The CF48 prop may or may not be faster. Depends on the prep of your X440, how the boat is tuned, etc. On thing CF props are good at is "flattening" out under load. The blades literally lose pitch as they flex under load, which allows the motor to spool up a but faster. Once at speed, they can reform and go... This may or may not be an advantage. It would likely pull less amps under load.

    Plus... the CF 48 prop is 48mm... vs only 40mm for yours... That's a BIG difference in blade area. He's got a lot more surface in the water providing thrust, which, in theory, should make the boat faster. BUT, again, where is his strut compared to yours? You can't go from a 48mm prop to a 40mm prop WITHOUT changing the strut height and expect to get a decent comparison. When you change prop diameters, you NEED to adjust the strut accordingly.

    I think what I'd suggest is that, if you think you have a problem, try to match his setup and see what yours does. BUT, match it EXACTLY if you are going to directly compare... Trim tab adjustments, strut adjustment, etc., ALL combine to give you your performance. There is so much more to it than just dropping in KV and throwing on a prop.

    NOW, personally, I think if you took that X440, properly balanced and sharpened it, and get the strut adjusted correctly, it "should" provide some decent speeds. It might be an issue in hard left-hand turns, do to the small diameter and the offset strut position, but it "should" be capable of laying down some MPH... I think a 42x55 would be a better choice, but with a little tweaking to the pitch on your X440, you should be able to get it to work.
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Just taking a wild stab at an estimate here, using the advertised pitch of the stock X440, and assuming your batteries are REALLY good... maintaining 1.05V/cell under load (NOT very likely... I'm guessing they are .95 or so at best...), here is what I'd expect to see from your boat:

    14.7V * 2300KV = 33,810 RPM

    (33,810 * 2.198pitch)/1057 *(1- Slip%) = MPH

    Assuming about 30% slip for a stock X440 without any tweaking on a mono:

    70.30 * (1-.30) = 70.30 * .70 = 49.21mph

    In other words... you are going to need to have everything PERFECTLY setup to get 50mph out of this setup with that prop, using NiMH cells...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AB
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by makin' waves View Post
    Hi Darin,

    The bloke on the vid says his nimhs are IB3600s (14 cells) and I'm using Intellect 5000 mah (14 cells)
    therfore i'm thinking my batteries should be faster?
    He is using a Cf48 prop, I'm using an X440 which in theory should work better because of the torque loss on the motor?




    which is the Ammo 36-50-2300KV and both on stock ESC's
    Does that sound right to you mate?




    Tone

    Do not think just because you have 5000 mah batteries you will be faster, most of these packs I have seen people use have spot welded tabs on them, and are end to end cells. The tab on the end is the first and most critical failure spot on the entire pack. when the cells and tabs get hot it melts the insulation heat shrink on the end cell and shorts out the cell effectivelly killing the cell! The sport packs I have had the most success with are the Duratrax 4200mah side by side cells that come factory with battery bars on them, you will need to change the wire on them as some come with 14 gauge.
    There is no replacement for displacement, I guess I just have to Buzz it higher!

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 7500RPM View Post
    Do not think just because you have 5000 mah batteries you will be faster, most of these packs I have seen people use have spot welded tabs on them, and are end to end cells. The tab on the end is the first and most critical failure spot on the entire pack. when the cells and tabs get hot it melts the insulation heat shrink on the end cell and shorts out the cell effectivelly killing the cell! The sport packs I have had the most success with are the Duratrax 4200mah side by side cells that come factory with battery bars on them, you will need to change the wire on them as some come with 14 gauge.
    Exactly! Every off-the-shelf pack I have has spot-welded, VERY thin metal tabs on them... Voltage drop is SEVERE under load...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AB
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darin Jordan View Post
    Exactly! Every off-the-shelf pack I have has spot-welded, VERY thin metal tabs on them... Voltage drop is SEVERE under load...

    Spot On Darin....no pun intended! There are not many Nimh packs out there that can support the very high peak current demands of FE boats, choose wisely, Battery Bars are a MUST !
    There is no replacement for displacement, I guess I just have to Buzz it higher!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •