Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 136

Thread: Miss Geico-What Works For Me

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ron1950 View Post
    a very cheep and easy offset is the octura stand offs....about 10 dollars
    Ron,
    I noticed that I only had a 70% reduction in porpoising when I used the Octura brackets. In my opinion, the rudder is still too close to the thrust cone with the Octura set-up. The Kintec bracket off sets the centerline of my rudder blade from the centerline of the thrust cone by 1.6" and I have absolutley no bounce whatsoever. I also modified the fore-to-aft dimension of the bracket so that the rudder is closer to the transom.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
    Airman
    That is just what I needed! Your drawing is perfect. It seems Kintec may have miss drilled one of the holes in the bracket I received, as my rudder is on angle now. I will send him a picture and share with him what we all have concluded about the shape of his bracket.
    Thank you
    Boomer
    Let me know if Jan needs a 3D CAD file or anything else. I do CAD for a living and I can do it very easily and quickly for him or anyone else.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel6401 View Post
    Did strength suffer with the red part being removed?
    I wouldn't worry about the strength of the bracket after it is modified - it is aircraft grade aluminum and very strong. It is at least 5x as strong as the stock aluminum from the MG rudder assembly.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by airman66285 View Post
    I wouldn't worry about the strength of the bracket after it is modified - it is aircraft grade aluminum and very strong. It is at least 5x as strong as the stock aluminum from the MG rudder assembly.
    If something happens while driving a MG that requires a rudder assembly that is "5x as strong as the stock aluminum from the MG rudder assembly", I think you have bigger issues to deal with that the strength of the stock hardware...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by airman66285 View Post
    Ron,
    In my opinion, the rudder is still too close to the thrust cone with the Octura set-up.

    You guys... if you noticed in my mod that I posted when this first came up, you should move the rudder FORWARD as well as to the side. I try to line up the leading edge with the drive-dog or front of prop, which keeps the rudder blade clear of the thrust cone... I drilled new holes in the rudder assembly to accommodate moving it forward as well...

    That being said... mine is currently back further than that, and it doesn't have any porpoising at all when the balance is set correctly...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darin Jordan View Post
    You guys... if you noticed in my mod that I posted when this first came up, you should move the rudder FORWARD as well as to the side. I try to line up the leading edge with the drive-dog or front of prop, which keeps the rudder blade clear of the thrust cone... I drilled new holes in the rudder assembly to accommodate moving it forward as well...

    That being said... mine is currently back further than that, and it doesn't have any porpoising at all when the balance is set correctly...
    Um, that's what I did - moved the rudder further away from the propeller and closer to the transom. I was just trying to point out that the length of the Octura brackets put the rudder to close to the prop.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darin Jordan View Post
    If something happens while driving a MG that requires a rudder assembly that is "5x as strong as the stock aluminum from the MG rudder assembly", I think you have bigger issues to deal with that the strength of the stock hardware...
    I didn't mean to knock the stock hardware - I just wanted to communicate the fact that removing material from the Kintec bracket did not make anything weaker for this application.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by airman66285 View Post
    I didn't mean to knock the stock hardware - I just wanted to communicate the fact that removing material from the Kintec bracket did not make anything weaker for this application.
    Just ribbin' ya, Man...
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    fl
    Posts
    10

    Default Hatch Kit

    There were people asking about the hatch kit on his mg .You can get the sv 27 hatch kit from Jan at kintec also when you order youre bracket. Works great and holds down the inner tub cover. , and it comes complete 1 screw with 2 o rings and washer to keep the water out. Works Great!! complete with a machined solid screw base ( E Z install ) and good price too! 10-20 minute job

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    ms
    Posts
    3,024

    Default

    hey sounds good to me whatever works for each boat.....i being cheep as hell tryed the octura mounts first lol
    MY RETIREMENT PLAN?????.....POWERBALL
    74 vintage kirby clasic hydro, pursuit mono, mg, 47'' mono, popeye hydro...

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    IA
    Posts
    101

    Default

    Airman,

    Are you sure after the MG is on plane (step) that the Kintec bracket is creating drag? I would definitely agree with the drag getting the boat on plane, but once there, I don't see it causing a problem. Mine jumps up on plane so fast, I don't know if I really would mess with it.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    8,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tman52804 View Post
    Airman,

    Are you sure after the MG is on plane (step) that the Kintec bracket is creating drag? I would definitely agree with the drag getting the boat on plane, but once there, I don't see it causing a problem. Mine jumps up on plane so fast, I don't know if I really would mess with it.
    It it's still getting hit by the prop spray, then it's going to cause drag... Looks like the rudder arm/linkage, and the bottom of the bracket, are all still in the spray of the prop.
    Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
    "Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Ca
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Darin
    Could you share the actual distance from the transom to the leading edge of your rudder and the length of your spacers?
    That would help me in only drilling once.
    Thank you
    Boomer
    Last edited by Boomer; 11-13-2010 at 11:18 AM.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tman52804 View Post
    Airman,

    Are you sure after the MG is on plane (step) that the Kintec bracket is creating drag? I would definitely agree with the drag getting the boat on plane, but once there, I don't see it causing a problem. Mine jumps up on plane so fast, I don't know if I really would mess with it.
    Yes, the bottom part of the bracket was out of the water once she got on plane but it still hit the water and caused drag when it went over waves on the water and when I went into a corner.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    IA
    Posts
    101

    Default

    That's what I figured. It really shouldn't make a big difference, but every little bit helps.

  16. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Ab
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darin Jordan View Post
    You guys... if you noticed in my mod that I posted when this first came up, you should move the rudder FORWARD as well as to the side. I try to line up the leading edge with the drive-dog or front of prop, which keeps the rudder blade clear of the thrust cone... I drilled new holes in the rudder assembly to accommodate moving it forward as well...

    That being said... mine is currently back further than that, and it doesn't have any porpoising at all when the balance is set correctly...
    I have a question about all this offset stuff. Mine still bounces even with the offset rudder, when I'm using a 642, when I step up to a (or down, depending on how you see it) to a 447, runs smooth as glass. The question, can the rudder be to close to the transom?? I was thinkin of getting a whole different rudder assmembly, so the the offset rudder and the drive are 2 separate pieces. I just don't want to order the wrong part, by having it to close to the transom.
    The rudder I was thinking of is this one, or similar.

    http://www.offshoreelectrics.com/pro...ros-rud-dualpu

  17. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    ms
    Posts
    3,024

    Default

    does it lose speed with the 447 at all? if not id just use that one but i am cheep and dont want to pay 50 bucks for a new rudder lol good luck with it
    MY RETIREMENT PLAN?????.....POWERBALL
    74 vintage kirby clasic hydro, pursuit mono, mg, 47'' mono, popeye hydro...

  18. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mo
    Posts
    2,716

    Default

    I think it is the rudder design...not about it being inline. Other cats do not have this problem with inline rudders. My hor cat runs great with that set up.

    I may try another rudder and see if that helps before I mount it over to the side.

  19. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Ab
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ron1950 View Post
    does it lose speed with the 447 at all? if not id just use that one but i am cheep and dont want to pay 50 bucks for a new rudder lol good luck with it
    Ron, I'm only trying the smaller one cause when I'm using the 447, the wires get really hot after only a few min of running. The 447 also pushed the boat to 45 mph on 5s, with 642 I'm only getting 38?? I was told it should be faster with the 642. Doesn't seem to be the case. But the wires are way cooler running the smaller prop.

    I'm going to move the rudder in and over a bit before I drill any holes.
    See if it runs smooth with what I did today. I'm using the octura offsets, so I just drilled two new holes on the rudder clamp, moved it right up as far as I could. And put a small spacer in to move it away from the prop a bit.
    I will test it tomorrow and let you know. As long as the snow stays away...

  20. #50
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    ms
    Posts
    3,024

    Default

    some will disagree but i found mine likes smaller props with some pitch also...dont know why but it stays cooler also.....bummer about the snow....i though we had it bad cause it finally rained today lol
    Last edited by ron1950; 11-13-2010 at 08:49 PM.
    MY RETIREMENT PLAN?????.....POWERBALL
    74 vintage kirby clasic hydro, pursuit mono, mg, 47'' mono, popeye hydro...

  21. #51
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    IA
    Posts
    101

    Default

    Airman,

    I just installed my seaking 180 amp esc and the motor wires really make it difficult to get the inner seal and canopy on. Did you quit using the inner (smoke colored) cover/seal?

  22. #52
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Ab
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ron1950 View Post
    some will disagree but i found mine likes smaller props with some pitch also...dont know why but it stays cooler also.....bummer about the snow....i though we had it bad cause it finally rained today lol
    Lol! You must be way down south. I'm in Vegas today for a course, looking at all the water makes me wish I brought a boat with me!!!! Going home tonight to about 1.5' of snow, and I'm pretty sure the ponds are now solid!!! I'm jealous of you southern boys!!! It's 75 degrees out!! No snow, and I'm wishing I wasn't way up in the north.
    I wasn't able to test my new setup, now, if I could find a pool or something. Lol!
    Guess I have to wait till spring, or come back south very soon.

  23. #53
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    ms
    Posts
    3,024

    Default

    with any luck your basement will flood and u can test it out then...lol...actually all that snow makes u guys appricate the summer more then down here......it was 68 today and i thought it was too cold to go to the lake.....
    MY RETIREMENT PLAN?????.....POWERBALL
    74 vintage kirby clasic hydro, pursuit mono, mg, 47'' mono, popeye hydro...

  24. #54
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    1,598

    Default

    I'm keeping the inline rudder.......I just moved my motors away from the rudder!
    Attached Images Attached Images
    FE BOATING: Less like a hobby and more like an addiction!

  25. #55
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    5,669

  26. #56
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    ms
    Posts
    3,024

    Default

    nice..........
    MY RETIREMENT PLAN?????.....POWERBALL
    74 vintage kirby clasic hydro, pursuit mono, mg, 47'' mono, popeye hydro...

  27. #57
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Ca
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Blackcat26
    How about some more pictures? Like whats under the canopy? It was just a matter of time before someone did this. Very, very nice. This boat was born to be a twin.
    Boomer

  28. #58
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    1,598

    Default

    I'm sorry to the OP for this is a partial hi-jack. I simply posted that pic for humor.....Boomer check me out in the boat building section for all the details.
    FE BOATING: Less like a hobby and more like an addiction!

  29. #59

    Default

    Yeah I'll ateast to the Kinetc's bracket strength... I was using an industrial grinder and the thing was actually slowing down when I was wearing down the bracket... and heating up the metal till it began to get soft. Very strong aluminum. So I took of the bottom part (the red shown in the 3d image) but left a small section to maintain the 2 screw hole. I'm undecided if I want to take off the blue part yet... since It will be accelerating on a straight line most of the time that part shouldn't cause drag (just a negligible amount). But if I find that it is a problem in my turning I will take it off.

  30. #60
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    5,669

    Default Prop/ gps tests

    Ran a pack w/ my niehbors BJ26 this am. If it wasnt for corners, his BJ definitely would smoke the MG. Im not havin that. Listening to the two boats run, same proboat motors, same batteries, his BJ winds out way more than the MG. I had a GPS in her and she came in at a dissapointing 33.4mph. This was using Turningy 5000mah 40-50C packs. So he left and I began some testing. I removed the x642 that is S/B/DT&C'd and installed a S&B x640. I installed the same rated packs that were peaked a week ago and came in w/ 35.5mph. Progress. The boat seemed to want to bounce a bit more with it. Perhaps I needed to move the strut up a bit. However, instead, I puled it and installed a m445. She threw up a lot more water in the roost, couldnt tell at first as it was going away from me if it was better or worse. Strangely, I heard no "wah wah wah". I turned her around and ran towards the shore. She was gettin it, tru as could be and definitely the best shes run. GPS showed 40.4! The only other change I made in the boat was last night I installed a T-120 ESC in the event I ran 5S today. For two reasons, 1.) Even though some get away w/ it, I will never run a PB ESC on 5S again as I smoked one doing so about a year ago. 2.) Seeing "Yoda's" amp results , I did not want to run a 445 on that esc. Im sure it would be fine, but I need to test to see if I can turn the 445 for 4 minutes for Offshore. Im sure the PB esc would came in a bit warm after that. I hope it works out, if not, seems the 640 so far is the way to go.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •