http://member.namba.com
Did someone give a reason why the bearing is included in the overall length
to me it would seem that the bearing being outside of the case, allows the rotor to be longer within the casing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Schweers
What good is a longer rotor if it’s sticking out of the stator?
Longer Rotor and longer Stator with bearings sticking out of the ends.
Larry
Yes Sir!Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUCKPULL
Proposal #9
Although I'm a FE guy, this proposed rule says in section 16 -Race Organization G -Inspections -2 that; for example "If a 1st place finisher is disqualified, the other positions do not move up in points.
Then in section 6 -special class consideration Stock & G-Limited it says they would move up in points? Why is this class's an exception?
If second place(overall for the day) is found to be in violation and disqualified, the 3rd place finisher (over all for the day) moves up to second and the 4th moves up to 3rd. No points will be altered or changed do to any qualifications.Quote:
Originally Posted by GixerGuy1978
I have no horse in this race but I do have a question.
What 60mm motors were being raced? Were they winning?
OSE Raider 3660
Leopard 3660
SSS 3660
GoolRC 3660
And many others as 3660 is a popular size.
"Were they winning" is not a qualifying factor into allowing a motor to be run within the class. I believe the idea was to be as inclusive as possible for both now and the future without going over board by allowing anything over 60mm. Anything between 56mm to 60mm long should be a good motor for the class.
Could 58mm max work? Sure... today that size limit would add a couple popular motors into the class. But frankly those 2 motors are already allowed within the NAMBA rules with approval by the CD. They were allowed at the 2018 NAMBA Nats "Legally".
But what happens if those manufactures discontinue those couple motors or they just get extended to 60mm long with the same guts for whatever reason? A 60mm max length will be inclusive for many years to come based on the rounded numbers of 3660 being popular among manufactures. IOW... Chances of 60mm max needing to change in the future is very minimal. While a 58mm max has a "higher" probability of needing to be extended someday to be more inclusive.
At the club level... it's easy to change and I probably would have voted for that if I was a member of MMEU. The national organization they are involved with appears to be taking a different path. And that method of doing what works today with ease of changing is an "idea". An idea that could have different clubs running different rules and the host club for National Events may decide the rules being utilized that year. No one really knows... there is nothing in the rule book for any of what is going on there.
But that's not how NAMBA is structured. In order for a class to run at a National Event for "National Championship" status the class rules need to be properly proposed, board approved and voted on by the entire membership. At the NAMBA National Level... it's not so easy to make rule changes and thus IMO this is the right move in consideration of a National Rule Set. This NAMBA rule proposal isn't just about today and getting those 2 popular motors in the class without CD approval. This rule proposal makes the rule tech-able and thinks past the end of this or next season and into the future so these debates don't need to happen again.
I am so happy with NAMBA for stepping up and doing something. Thanks to all who have contributed to this process.
Hopefully this process can stay positive and just let NAMBA members vote without non-members attempting to stir the pot. :tiphat:
I dont believe it matters at this point, but It would be nice if IMPBA adopted similar rules for cross organization racers.Quote:
Originally Posted by T.S.Davis
Let me see if I understand. Cuz I want to.
When we talked 60 to 62......the consensus was that a 62 was going to be next level faster. Nobody in the US raced them but we all just accepted this as fact. 2 mm of motor was a game a changer.
The motors that are 60mm.......available today aren't winners. Would be legal but not that great. They aren't popular because they don't win. No offense. I have the chart so I knew what was available. Most of the winning motors are less than 58. These are the norm motor wise. What's going to stop a company from building a 60mm 6 pole motor that is a game changer. An additional 2mm of copper and watts. You guys know this is extremely possible right? Hell, its probable. Someone with connections could make this happen before summer. Surely we're not this naive.
I'll try asking it different. What 60mm motors were raced for wins? Not "what is available"?
By the way. I wanted 60mm. Someone pointed out to me the 2mm power thing. Now sure why I couldn't think of it that way before. I may give that guy a hammer for the next time I can't grasp something.
Terry a size was decided and proposal brought forth. the members of Namba will then decide on what "they" would like to do as an organization by voting. If someone comes up with a 60mm motor with 59mm of coil/stator and 6 poles, good luck to them. They will be the next "Aquacraft/Proboat" motor in p limited racing.Quote:
Originally Posted by T.S.Davis
EXACTLY! Where is the like button? :hug1:Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Vaccaro
I was going to put it this way:
If a company builds a 60mm 6-pole motor then racers will upgrade if they'd like to. That's it… That's what will happen. And then there will be 1 or 2 motors which win the most races… just like there is now.
And BTW... The 2 most winning motors right now are 56mm 6-pole. So what IF someone makes a 58mm 6-pole motor? It will probably be better than the current winning motors. So why don’t we just make the rule 56mm?
At some point a line has to be drawn and 60mm is enough of a limiter so that the class doesn't turn into full P speeds. Going too small could require more changes in the future along with the possibility that RTR or ARTR offerings could have a 59mm to 60mm motor which we'd be asking newbies to go spend more money and change out. Let them get on the water, have some fun and figure out through talking to mentors that soldering isn't that hard if they'd like to upgrade and make their boat more competitive. Ask a newbie to spend more and learn to solder before they even do one lap... And they're gone.
A prime example of this is the Pursuit Mono which can be purchased from many suppliers ARTR with an SSS 3660 motor. There is a thread on this forum discussing the problem of lack of RTR and ARTR Monos to get Newbies started out. Going under a 60mm limit just blew that option out of the water. TFL Popeye is another example. It can be bought ARTR with an SSS 3660.
I'm hearing what you're saying with "they" but you just called for "IMPBA adopt similar rules". Sooooo.....NAMBA votes and IMPBA gets in line. haha Uh huh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Vaccaro
Steven, why 60? Why not 62? 63,64,65,55,50,42?
58 offered a little bit of fudge factor for manufacturing from what is being proven on the pond. 62mm was apparently a ton of fudge factor. But 60......that's not too much. It's not too much......today......... based on the existing offerings. Ever see a Leopard with it's guts ripped out and re-wound for more power? Nice motor.
I get that there needs to be some standard somewhere. At some point there has to be a max. That's what this proposal is. I'm not trying to just poop in the soup. I'm just not sure 60mm is the right max. I did think it was right. Totally believed we were on the path to enlightenment. haha Truth in lending or whatever. I'm no longer certain is all I'm saying.
I still believe we should be able to have a guy buy something off the shelf and be in the ball park. I realize selection is limited at the moment. However, if Lehner spits out a 6 pole 36x60mm motor that's $400.......where does average new guy fit into racing? He doesn't.
Oh, also.....some of our spec boats are right out on the ragged edge of drive-ability already with 57.5mm motors. If a hot new Dynamite 2200kv that was 60mm came along the boats will be even faster? Seems likely. Can we go faster? Should we? 65mph+ limited sport? Sheesh. I mean.....what the heck fir? At the risk of sounding like Smock......jump to P and get it over with.
And what if Dynamite does comes out with that 2200kv that is 60mm long and discontinues the current 56mm motor? And let's say SSS does the same thing?
What are we left with??? The TP which god only knows which length can that will come in.
You're providing a lot of what ifs... but failing to look at the opposing what ifs.
Let's put some questions on you.
What motors are available at below 58mm if the Dynamite and SSS/Promarine 56mm long 6-poles go away?
What are the chances that more future motors are developed under 58mm? Seems 60mm is the most popular threshold.
Lehner doesn't make 6-pole motors. Niether does Neu.Quote:
Originally Posted by T.S.Davis
So chances of them spitting out a product to dominate NAMBA and/or IMPBA racing isn't likely.
It's already been said many time that manufactures pay no attention to us.
The most probable manufactures to come out with 60mm long 6-pole motors (if any were to do so) are Dynamite, SSS or TP. And all those options would be affordable to the average new guy.
Fine Plettenburg then. haha Plett likely has an 8 pole we haven't looked at now that I think about it. Lehner doesn't make a 6 pole...... today. Neither does TP, OSE, or Leopard. I've asked TP repeatedly. Not sure about SSS. Thought those were 4 pole. That's today of course.
All fair points Dave.
We screwed this up before. Don't want it to happen again.
Understood :tiphat:Quote:
Originally Posted by T.S.Davis
But FYI... the Promarine 3656 2030kv is a 6-pole motor and that is ultimately an SSS motor with Promarine branding on it.
https://www.offshoreelectrics.com/pr...?prod=tfl-3656
BTW... No one screwed this up before.Quote:
Originally Posted by T.S.Davis
The current P-Limited rules worked... Until they didn't. As someone once said to me.
And this new rule proposal will work (if passed)... until IT doesn't.
There is no perfect answer to any of this stuff. :confused2:
Those ARE legitimate concerns you bring up, BUT...
I believe the biggest reason the current P-Limited rules don't work anymore is because of manufacturing changes and a lack of motor supply. Lack of tech-ability isn't the biggest problem. No one was ever caught cheating and no one ever dominated so much that the masses thought there was cheating going on.
I personally believe anything less then 60mm will inevitably lead to the same demise of a new rule set if a couple manufactures stop making what they are now.
While on the other hand... I don't see there being a lack of possible motors within a 60mm limit.
Yes, there may be some room for innovation that MAY surpass the current winning motors. But that will all settle down, the new ceiling will be found and the new preferred motor will be used... until they're not. And someday someone may bring a $50 Leo motor to a Nats and win a National Championship with it. Turning laps with a proper setup and a little luck means more then anything else.
In the end we will have:
a.) motors which will be more limited then Open P Classes,
b.) motors which will be more cost effective then Open P Classes,
c.) more possibilities for RTR/ARTR boats to be purchased and raced without a motor swap, and
d.) less possibility of legal motors no longer being available.
If the 60mm limit passes in NAMBA and IMPBA leadership isn't comfortable with matching then they should do what they believe is right. NAMBA leadership and the members whom made this proposal have heard/seen all the debates and they've made the choice that they think is right for NAMBA. As discussed in Brian's article in Propwash... NAMBA wants something which should not have to be revisited over and over again. That cuts down on wasting resources and frankly... the drama.
Really terry.. u were all on board with this.. now you are bashing it?? I’m kinda at a loss for words here buddy..I know you hate NAMBA.. we came up with an idea.. tested it.. was too big.. so lowered the size.. tested so it would allow motors..it’s a simple thing to tech if needed.. period.. no weight.. just a simple go no go size.. it really baffles me how you were on board with this and now you aren’t..something had to be done as the notor availability was drying up.. so here we are in Namba with a proposal that went out to the membership for a vote..where have u gotten or have you even submitted anything for impba?? Sorry if we didn’t want to drag our feet here and have the biggest fe classes just go away..It would be great to have parity with impba..maybe you should work on that instead of bashing what we are trying to do to keep limited racing alive and well..just really baffles and kinda upsets me that all of the dudden you are against this
Well stated!!Quote:
Originally Posted by dethow
Again, lets not get into the debate all over again.
the members of Namba will make a choice. Its the great thing about having voting rights. And we will see what happens from there.
Agreed Steve...Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Vaccaro
We've all debated it and those that haven't... have already read the debates.
It's time to stop and let the vote take place with no last minute lobbying for points of view.
The only reason I chimed into this thread was to answer some of Terry's questions regarding rational for the proposal and to offer counter points to his opinions on the matter. IMPBA guys need to let NAMBA members vote with no more opinions/debates. If the rule proposal is passed and they don't like it... they have every opportunity to do what they want to within their organization.
Have a great weekend. :tiphat:
The proposal passed.. the new namba size limit is 37x60 max size..not sure of effective date.. but after nationals.. thx to all that voted..hope to see everyone out racing sokn
Quote:
Originally Posted by dethow
does the 37x60mm have a KV limit?Quote:
Originally Posted by rayzerdesigns
Ray or anyone here have a current full list of motors legal for Limited classes?
No kV limit. No motor list. Time to do setup research.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brushless55
Okay cool, so going back to my original question for myself and others who may have been away from racing "toy boats" and to bring some clarity.Quote:
Originally Posted by raptor347
Keeping it simple, we are no longer concerned with KV or motor weight just size as in 37mm x 60mm and open to all KV within the motor size limits?
sounds easy enough... :rockon2:
Correct. Simple tech. Tune your setup and go race.