Tweet
I realize not many have seen the boat but, to those who have or heard. Will stuff tubes and framing inside need as much tweaking as many other RTR boats? Would removing the teflon inside stuff tube be feasable? These if were not needing fixed from factory could add some speed and reliablity sales from newb's. Just wondering if they realized how many put so much work into their previous boats to show up as bad report from forums.
-
-
Tweaking? Do you mean aligning? BTY there is no framing inside the boat. Personally I do not run a boat with out checking the alignment of the shaft.. (All boats RTR or other)
(BTY.. nothing to do with this project) I once tested how far off you could have a stuffing tube, still win races and not have crap break.. You would be surprised.. its silly.. it will eventually start to split the brass, way before the cable start to fatigue.
I would only remove the Teflon IF i was to use an auto oilier. (not typical on FE boats)
When you say They.. do you mean ME? That is what you are saying. Bottom line.. Im a boat racer. I also have a background in mechanical design. I ran my own successful RC business so I have a good idea of how to listen to the end user. Lots of I’s in there but its just the facts.
But like all product development projects you have trade offs.. (I call it picking your battles). If you go to the fight with the intention of winning them all.. you will DIE trying. There is no such thing as winning them all. When it comes to how many holes we drill in a bushing or the alignment of the stuffing tube… the cost it can take to communicate that can might not be worth the gain..
So
You like to have the shaft aligned PERFITLY with the stuffing tube.. me to.. same with the MFG.. great for one boat.. now make MANY! And pay your bud “jim” or whoever do them for ya.. tell me what you get.. I bet at the end of the day Friday, Jim is wishing he has a tolerance to set the alignment. (say.. shaft not touching the side of the stuffing tube) as it exits the cable coupler. Remember winning them all!
ROCK ON
Again feel free to ask questions.
Grimracer -
Wow! sweet. Ask a question and get straight answers right from the source. Thank you Sir. I meant no harm in question and comment. I received a few boats with loose motors, leaking cooling, loose stuff tubes, and etc. I understand it is difficult to mass produce. I cant wait to order one.Comment
-
Thanks, anytime... let me know how you like the boat, I have a feeling your realy going to like it.
GrimracerComment
-
At 329 or 279 for a SV how can you beat that. You get all you need, so it needs to be personalized... Not everyone will be happy but then there are boats costing 6, 7, 9 hundred bucks they can get. Not stickin up for anyone but the SV is one hell of a boat for the money and I cant wait to see a op to grab a UL1, I am sure its gonna be awsomeComment
-
I am excited about putting the UL-1 motor and ESC into my SV27!! Can't wait for those to be offered separately.
I've seen the UL-1 up close and personal and it is a really nice boat out of the box. People will naturally want to do their own tweaks with it, but from what I've seen they are not required. Overall between the SV27 and UL-1 I think AquaCraft has nailed it!!Don't get me started
Comment
-
I am extremely happy with both my SV's. I cant wait to get the UL-1! My birthday is in January I'll have to give the wife a subtle hint. LOLMany issues!!!Comment
-
Question, I have a Octura 1742-3 prop here. It dont work with anythiing I have. Will it work on the UL1. If yes then I will keep it around.Comment
-
1700 series props were developed for OB hydroplane racing. You are going to have to remove some lift to make it work well.. Typically high lift props (unless moded) are hard to make work on full body hydros.
GrimComment
-
I noticed the UL-1 has a three channel receiver.
Is the 3rd channel for that servo which pops open the hood
Or maybe I can deploy that airbag to prevent what happened to my SV...
Seriously, any way to use that 3rd channel with another transmitter or simple mod to the transmitter ?Comment
-
The photos of the Tactic 2.4GHz radio I've seen say "2-channel radio control system" on the front of the transmitter. I understand that no other transmitter will work with the Tactic receivers. It might be cool if there was an option for a 3rd channel, but frankly for a race boat there is no need for more than two. Too much happening in a race to find the 3rd channel button....
.ERROR 403 - This is not the page you are looking for
Comment
-
Darin E. Jordan - Renton, WA
"Self-proclaimed skill-less leader in the hobby."Comment
-
PlaneZero.. are you somewhat new to RC.. GOOD DEAL FOR SURE.. you are going to have a blast.. ROCK ON!!!
Reason I ask is for years not radio MFGs will some times build extra channels in to the RXs and sell just one.. or a few kinds...It allows us to add goodies to a boat or car package at the drop of a hat.
The TX that comes with the UL-1 is a 2 channel.. the RX a 3 channel.. in time we will likely offer applications for that RX.
Having said that Jay is 100% right.. unless its a needle.. no need in a FE boat, at least not for most racing.
GrimComment
-
The 3rd channel is used to ignite the Estes rocket engine when you are in the home stretch.IMPBA 20481S D-12Comment
-
Mike, other than enjoying your SV27 for the last two years, the last transmitter I bought was a Robbe "economic" somewhere in the 80's
So, I am a new old guy to RC stuff.
I ordered a yellow UL-1 today with OSE and am sure I'll love it !
Seeing there was a 3 channel receiver I ventured to guess there would be a 3 channel transmitter also. Sometimes manufacturers use the same circuit printboards for different products and was asking if maybe this could easily be modded to use the 3rd channel.
Another (probably noob) question, how does this system work with multiple boats, do you need different frequency oscillators like in a 'normal' TX, or does it sort out different frequencies automagically when you arm it ?
Thanks for your answers...Comment
Comment