PDA

View Full Version : Formula For Calculating Speed (Revisited)



10gauge
04-01-2011, 07:26 PM
GEORGE'S SPEED EQUATION:

Here is a mathematical equation I derived 3 years ago to calculate speed for FE setups. I derived my formula on quantitative analysis and it is a fairly accurate statistical approximation of actual setups. My formula was verified by Jay Turner on RRR and it's within +/- 3% of his calculations.

knpc was asking how I was calculating my speeds, so I decided to repost this old thread to share with everyone. I find it very useful for approximating performance without having to take the boat on the water, or rely on the GPS all the time, and even save money on wrong props, or finding the props that I need for my speed goal. It takes the guess work out of the equation (no pun intended). You can plug-in various combination of props, kV's, cell voltages and accurately approximate your speed.

mph (cat) = [Prop Pitch] x [Prop Dia.] x [kV] x [LiPo V] / 36970

mph (Hydro) = [Prop Pitch] x [Prop Dia.] x [kV] x [LiPo V] / 33300

(Prop Dia in mm). Multiply Pitch, Dia, kV, V, then divide by 36970 for catamarans, and divide by 33610 for Hydros.

Here are the original threads from Feb 2008:
http://forums.offshoreelectrics.com/...ead.php?t=2695
http://www.rumrunnerracing.com/fefor...culating+speed

The above formula is in mm - more useful to plug in the numbers. But, here's my original formula from 2008 that had Prop dia in inches - it's basically the same formula:

mph = [Prop Factor] x [Prop dia] x [kv motor] x [LiPo Volts] x 0.000687
(Prop factor or pitch is 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, etc.; and Prop dia. is in inches).

mph = [Prop Distance per Revolution] x [kv motor] x [LiPo Volts] x 0.000687


EXAMPLES. Comparison of GPS and calculated speeds:
Setup 1: Lehner 2250/11, 8S, x447, claimed speed 60mph
(1.4 x 47 x 1076 x 29.6) / 36970 = 57mph calculated speed

Setup 2: (Jay Turner) Neu 1521/1D, 4S2P/3300/25C, m440, claimed speed 62mph
(1.4 x 40 x 2800 x 14.8) / 36970 = 63mph calculated speed

Setup 3: Feigao 12XL, 6S2P/8000, Y537/3, claimed speed 48.6mph
(1.5 x 37 x 1390 x 22.2) / 36970 = 46mph calculated speed

Setup 4: Feigao 9XL, 4S2P/10000, m545, claimed speed 50mph
(1.5 x 45 x 1853 x 14.8) / 36970 = 50 mph calculated speed



Martin asked about the formula for monos, I haven't tested it for monos, but based on the hull slip factor, it should be close to:

mph (mono) = [Prop Pitch] x [Prop Dia.] x [kV] x [LiPo V] / 39600

-George

martin
04-02-2011, 06:10 AM
I use a very simular system & my speeds come out very close indeed to your calcs on the examples you list, Do you have a final division number for monos as you list one for hydros & cats ie 33610 & 36970. I suspect it would be around 40000+. I find these calcs quite accurate & usefull, As you mention you can get an idea of what to expect from different props or kv, voltages etc before you even decide what boat or equipment your going to buy. Martin.

martin
04-02-2011, 06:16 AM
Something i often do is when someone post details of their runs where they have a sat nav in their boat & give the speed along with all the details of their set up ie kv,prop,voltage, type of hull etc. I calculate & get very close to speeds they have done. Martin.

jcald2000
04-02-2011, 07:10 AM
Or you can go here

http://www.offshoreelectrics.com/conversion.htm

martin
04-02-2011, 09:08 AM
I already have my own calcs for mono,cats & hydros but wondered if you had a calc for monos so i could compare them all. As i said my calcs on cats & hydros are very much the same as the examples you give. Martin.

10gauge
04-02-2011, 10:11 AM
This formula is not based on theoretical conditions. The data to derive my constant for cats (36970) and hydros (33300) was from a pool of 30 actual and running setups. So the results yield an average speed for a particular type of hull and the data pool doesn't represent "best case scenarios or runs." If anything, the formula doesn't overshoot speeds. This way, it keeps the numbers modest. You may be pleasantly surprised if your actual setup goes a few mph faster than calculated speed. I've also found that any differences between manufacturers may vary between 1-2 mph in most cases when testing.

jcald2000, that's a great reference. The Offshore calculation is within 3% of my measured results. My formula undershoots as it is an average of various setups, the Offshore formula overshoots as it is a best case scenario. Both have their uses, but to use the Offshore formula you have to be online - can't just compute on a handy calculator or phone.

Martin, I didn't post the mono formula because I've only tested the formula for cats and hydros. The essential difference between the various types of boats is their hull slip factor. Martin, for monos, based on the hull slip factor monos vs cats, I would place the mono factor around 39600. Again, I would want to test that number to verify it and average it for different manufacturers in the water under normal conditions so that it gives a result within 1-2 mph of the GPS readings. For monos, the formula should be close to:

mph (mono) = [Prop Pitch] x [Prop Dia.] x [kV] x [LiPo V] / 39600

SweetAccord
04-02-2011, 10:35 AM
George,

Thank you for this formula. I like it! Accurate and easy to use. Since you are a numbers person and with quantitative analysis, can you come up or know of a formula to determine timing settings on a motor? There is one for PWM but not one for timing. There seems to be a formula for everything else for FE but that.

Thank you.

10gauge
04-02-2011, 11:26 AM
Thanks SweetAccord. I haven't delved deeply into the electromechanics to calculate motor timing settings. However, I am curious, is there a formula to calculate amp draw for a particular prop and motor combination?... If there isn't, it would be nice to correlate hull type and size, prop, motor, kV, LiPo, and current draw - all in one neat formula!

SweetAccord
04-02-2011, 12:44 PM
George,

I don't recall but didn't the FE calculator give an amp draw value per prop pitch and size? I recall it had something in there. If not the boataholic site I think had something like it but the site seems down. I may be wrong.

sailr
04-02-2011, 01:16 PM
Some enterprising user out that should write a simple little program for this! PWEASE? Although I guess a calculator would work OK. Haha.

10gauge
04-02-2011, 05:12 PM
I've heard FE Calc and FE Calculator mentioned, but have never found it on any site. It would be a great adjunct to knowing what the amp draw would be for a particular prop, as well as the speed and run times before ever taking the boat in the water.

I forgot that I bought a V3 Logger - still new in the box. I guess I may have to start using it to derive a new equation. If I have time in my busy schedule, I'll see if I can get back into RC boats this year...

SweetAccord
04-02-2011, 06:54 PM
I've heard FE Calc and FE Calculator mentioned, but have never found it on any site. It would be a great adjunct to knowing what the amp draw would be for a particular prop, as well as the speed and run times before ever taking the boat in the water.

I forgot that I bought a V3 Logger - still new in the box. I guess I may have to start using it to derive a new equation. If I have time in my busy schedule, I'll see if I can get back into RC boats this year...

The FE calculator has been on OSE as far as I know:

http://forums.offshoreelectrics.com/showthread.php?t=15117

ksm2001
04-03-2011, 09:51 AM
Welcome back George, nice easy to use formula thankyou.:beerchug:

I used the values on my current build I'm working on a PT SS45 running a Neu 1527 1.5D, 6S2P 45-90C, m447, according to the calculations I should see 65.8mph. Ok now I want to get this boat finished to see it go.

I tried the cat formula for my DF29 that is gps'd at 57 mph and according to your calculations it came out to 55mph,cool.
Edit:Miscalculation in the prop size input was a x642 instead of a m445 which brings the speed to 65mph so the veehull doesn't add-up.


Ken

H2OCamel
04-03-2011, 10:26 AM
Nice formulas! Thanks so much!

10gauge
04-03-2011, 10:56 AM
Thanks SweetAccord for the link on FE Calculator. For some reason I can't enter new data for Neu motors and Castle ESC... I'll see if I can come up with something.

Thanks Ken, it's great to be back. That PT SS45 is a fantastic hull. Raydee had a fantastic build on it too. That 1527/1.5D is a beautiful motor for large hydros! I have not had the opportunity to put mine together yet as I've got the same setup - Neu 1527/1.5D, 6S2P/25C/10000mAh, CC-240HV.

Anytime guys - Sweetaccord, Ken, H2OCamel.... I wanted to make a small contribution in return for all the great advice I have received here.

siberianhusky
04-03-2011, 12:53 PM
SpeedCalc.exe
LOL I got bored having coffee. This works with vista, not sure about any other flavours.
Anything else?

Mel279
04-03-2011, 07:54 PM
how to calculate speed for twin-drive cat?

siberianhusky
04-03-2011, 08:27 PM
update that clarifies the pitch to be input

sailr
04-03-2011, 08:37 PM
Cool! Works great! Thanks!

6sHyper
04-04-2011, 01:04 AM
update that clarifies the pitch to be input

geez not to shabby, its fairly close to my 3 boats i currently have setup and the gps i'm getting out of them, thanks

Eodman
04-04-2011, 08:46 AM
Hey Mel, I asked the same question in the original post and If I remember right(which at my age ... well) there is an addition to the equation. I can't get the link to open for the old post so not sure! I wanted to know because of my twin jolly!

siberianhusky
04-04-2011, 10:08 AM
Let me know and I'll try to add twin calculations, might also work on adding a section where you can enter a custom number for the hull slip factor.
Things like this are pretty easy to whip up in VB. There is only about 8 lines of actual code in this app as it sits.

PDR447
04-04-2011, 01:10 PM
any chance of making it java or something so that it would be an OS independent app?

CornelP
04-04-2011, 02:40 PM
Thanks SweetAccord for the link on FE Calculator. For some reason I can't enter new data for Neu motors and Castle ESC... I'll see if I can come up with something.
.

Under Program Files/Fast Electric Boat Calculator you will find a text file called fecalc. Edit that according to the instructions. I'll take a look in my office pc, I might have the Feigao motors and some Turnigy batteries added...


Edit: I attach the file, I had it at home. It was edited by many OSE members in different versions. I just brought them together and added a couple.

siberianhusky
04-04-2011, 03:13 PM
LOL I haven't coded in Java in about 15 years. All I really know is PicMicro assembler. That was just something I whipped up in about 5 minutes,I learned VB so I could create a front end to control micro controllers from a PC.
I've been back into stonework for a long time now, I make more money as a stone mason and have more fun doing it! I hated working inside.

Mel279
04-05-2011, 06:33 AM
Hey Mel, I asked the same question in the original post and If I remember right(which at my age ... well) there is an addition to the equation. I can't get the link to open for the old post so not sure! I wanted to know because of my twin jolly!

thats ok, someone will get it for me..I hope:smile:

10gauge
04-06-2011, 10:10 PM
Mel and Eodman:
how to calculate speed for twin-drive cat?

And yes, Eodman, I remember you asking about twin drives 3 years ago, when I first introduced the formula. The link to my first threads are listed in the beginning of my post.

I will try to answer the question intuitively as possible. I don't think there's a linear increase in speed with twin drives over single drive. Sure, on a twin the initial acceleration is faster than a single, but the terminal speed is hindered to a greater extent by dividing power between 2 smaller motors, smaller props, extra drag, and extra weight.

Are the LiPo packs being shared among 2 motors, or does each motor have its own power pack?... If you have a shared power source for each motor, and after factoring in the offsets, the increase in speed for a twin is on the order of 19%. Formula for Twin vs Single - for identical motors and props in both setups, the comparative equation for a twin cat is: (hypothetical)

mph (Twin-Cat) = [prop pitch] x [Prop dia(mm)] x [kV] x [LiPo V] / 31060


I stopped testing/formulating on twin drives because I quickly realized that there was no big increase in speed with twins to justify the extra investment. More than anything else, prop factor and power from LiPos are the 2 most important factors in performance. If I want better performance = Bigger motor + larger prop!

Eodman
04-07-2011, 09:27 AM
Oh but the sight of them props setting on either side & the sound of twins when at speed are worth it to me!

I think it has to do with my early formative years! We had a cabin on a lake in upstate NY and a family had handbuilt a Cat & mounted twin Merc 65 horsepower outboards on it! Now back then Mercs were all the rage & outboards were barely touch 90 horsepower so this thing was just the Cats' Meow. Fast as snot too!

Sadly it was lost in a fire over winter a few years back! But twins are in!

bbill1
05-06-2011, 08:51 AM
How are you guys coming up with your prop pitches? The pitch on a raw x447 is 2.59. Yet in the example below from post #1, it is listed as 1.4.


EXAMPLES. Comparison of GPS and calculated speeds:
Setup 1: Lehner 2250/11, 8S, x447, claimed speed 60mph
(1.4 x 47 x 1076 x 29.6) / 36970 = 57mph calculated speed


I've been into nitro for quite awhile and have never come across any other numbers for pitch other than what would be listed on a prop chart. (in inches and are 2+ inches of pitch for any props I have ever used.)

siberianhusky
05-06-2011, 09:19 AM
1.4 x 47 = 65.8mm = 2.59"
what don't you understand?
Octura props have always been numbered this way, makes it super easy to figure out what you have.

bbill1
05-06-2011, 09:25 AM
1.4 x 47 = 65.8mm = 2.59"
what don't you understand?
Octura props have always been numbered this way, makes it super easy to figure out what you have.

Not that I didn't understand.

For nitro I just always used the numbers on the chart. But I got it now. Thanks!

sailr
05-06-2011, 09:43 AM
1.4 is the 'factor' or multiplier. 1.4 x diameter = pitch. Same is true with say a 642 prop. that would be 1.6 x 42 = 67.2mm = 2.645661".


How are you guys coming up with your prop pitches? The pitch on a raw x447 is 2.59. Yet in the example below from post #1, it is listed as 1.4.



I've been into nitro for quite awhile and have never come across any other numbers for pitch other than what would be listed on a prop chart. (in inches and are 2+ inches of pitch for any props I have ever used.)

BHChieftain
05-06-2011, 09:57 AM
Thanks again for working this out. This is very helpful. But you need to add a "color" factor to your equation-- we all know red boats go faster...

:bounce:
Chief

properchopper
05-06-2011, 12:17 PM
Good stuff. One thing, 'tho ( and in no way is this a criticism of these efforts) is that the V or voltage value used is based on the nominal starting V which changes (decreases) considerably under load, as I have found after much data collection/plotting on several brands of batteries. The +/- 3% variation likely is a result, in some part, of this phenomenon. The KV is another possibly varying value based on production tolerance and other considerations.

Ub Hauled
05-07-2011, 03:18 AM
Tony, I thought about the same thing, but you had to throw a wrench in there, eh?
LOL

carlcisneros
05-07-2011, 12:03 PM
good inforamtion all around.

but, it is a tool for getting an idea of about how fast the boat is going.

nice to have folks that take time and figure things out for us out in the boating world.

GOT TO LOVE THIS FORUM!!!!!!!

properchopper
05-07-2011, 12:22 PM
Tony, I thought about the same thing, but you had to throw a wrench in there, eh?
LOL

Hey now, I only throw wrenches while working on my chopper - most of the time I throw hockey tape :biggrin:

Shooter
05-11-2011, 12:56 PM
Within 3mph of my GPS reading for my Vegas running 2200KV, X642, 4S. Nice work.:thumbup1:

martin
05-11-2011, 01:32 PM
Within 1.7mph of my GPS reading for my Vegas running 2200KV, X642, 4S. Nice work.:thumbup1:

What speed did you get with gps & from formula. Thanks Martin.

Shooter
05-13-2011, 03:52 PM
Hi Martin.

Vegas (X642 S&B, 1515 1Y): (1.6 x 42 x 2200 x 14.8)/33610 = 65mph (GPS = 62)

martin
05-13-2011, 04:48 PM
When ever i see someone post speeds with gps & they give relavent info like kv, volts, prop, type of hull i like to work speeds out on how i do it just to see how close or far away i am. With the info on your boat i got 60.8mph. Martin.

Shooter
05-15-2011, 02:18 PM
Martin - Which denominator is correct for Hydro? 33610 or 33300. Both are listed in your first post. Thanks.

martin
05-15-2011, 03:42 PM
I dont actually use that formula but either of those numbers work out quite close to one & other on calculated speeds. On say a 60mph boat both those numbers are only .5mph apart. Martin.

penz
06-21-2011, 12:54 PM
Hi Martin.

Vegas (X642 S&B, 1515 1Y): (1.6 x 42 x 2200 x 14.8)/33610 = 65mph (GPS = 62)

So im curious putting that prop on that 1515 motor how are your temps?(motor/esc/batts) What c rating batts are you running, and what esc? I am planing on running a 4074 2150kv motor in my apparition, i am shooting for 50 mph on 4s. If you hitting 65 mph with good temps then i think my setup should work good.

FloatDaBoat
06-30-2011, 12:52 AM
Here's a spread sheet version (XLS) that I whipped-out.